Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Hemanshu Ramniklal Shah v ITO (2025) 482 ITR 138/171 taxmann.com 19 (Guj)(HC) Editorial : SLP dismissed, ITO v. Hemanshu Ramniklal Shah (2025) 304 Taxman 610 / 482 ITR 147 (SC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Non application of mind-Change of opinion-Notice and order rejecting objections quashed and set aside [S. 68,143(3), 148,Art. 226]

Kapstone Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT [2023] 153 taxmann.com 305 / (2025) 482 ITR 940 (Bom)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Change of opinion-Failure to disclose material facts-Notice not valid.[S. 148, Art. 226]

Welcome Plywood Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO [2023] 153 taxmann.com 285 / (2025) 482 ITR 936 (Bom)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Change of opinion-Failure to disclose material facts-Notice not valid.[S. 148, Art. 226]

Wellgroomed Venture v. ACIT (2025) 482 ITR 813 (Bom)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Change of opinion-Reassessment notice and order disposing of the objection are quashed. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Aashish Niranjan Shah v. UOI [2024] 167 taxmann.com 561 / (2025) 482 ITR 492 (Bom)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Scrutiny assessment-No evidence of failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing of objection was quashed. [S. 143(3) 148, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Mahabir Jute Mills Ltd [2024] 162 taxmann.com 601 / (2025) 482 ITR 345 (All)(HC)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-No rejection of books of account-Deletion of addition by the Tribunal based on three years’ gross profit is affirmed.[S.260A]

Aldrin Alberto Araujo Soares v. Dy. CIT 2024] 162 taxmann.com 186 /(2025) 482 ITR 257 (Bom (HC)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Non-eligible assessee-Assessing Officer cannot propose draft assessment order to vary income or loss in return of resident assessee not eligible assessee-Order set aside.[S.144C(15)(b), Art. 226]

PCIT v. Fiberhome India Pvt. Ltd [2024] 159 taxmann.com 772 / (2025) 482 ITR 221 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Limitation-Draft assessment order Assessment order passed beyond statutory limitation period of one month from date of directions issued by Dispute Resolution Panel-Order is quashed and set aside.[S.144C(13), 260A]

Dineshkumar Chhaganbhai Nandani v. ITO [2023] 157 taxmann.com 738 / (2025) 482 ITR 900 (Guj)(HC)

S. 144B: Faceless Assessment-Variation proposed in draft. Twelve hours’ time granted to reply to show-cause notice-cum-draft assessment order-Documents requested not supplied-Request for cross-examination of person not granted Reasonable opportunity of being heard not granted Violation of principles of natural justice-Assessment order set aside.[S. 144,147, 148, Art. 226]

Maheshkumar Bhagvandas Patel v. ITO (2025) 482 ITR 840 (Guj)(HC)

S. 144B: Faceless Assessment-Opportunity of personal hearing must be given if requested-Order of assessment not valid.[S.144B(6), Art. 226]