Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Geecee Ventures Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 127 ITR 371 / 174 taxmann.com 1285 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 80-IA : Industrial undertaking-Deduction-To be allowed from gross total income-Order of CIT(A) to allow deduction after verification of claim was held to be proper. [S. 143(3)]

Society for Technology Business Incubator v. CIT (2025) 127 ITR 719 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 80G : Donation-Charitable institution-Registration-Application filed under wrong clause-Technical error not fatal-Registration directed.[S. 12AA, 80G(5)(vi)]

Amway India Enterprises (P.) Ltd. v. NFAC (2025) 127 ITR 642 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 80G: Donation-Corporate Social Responsibility expenditure-Eligible donation-Deduction allowable-Receipts not produced-Matter remanded for verification.[S. 37(1)]

Ankit Gems P. Ltd. v. Circle 5(1)(1) (2025) 127 ITR 265 / 178 taxmann.com 454 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-Burden of proving taxability lies on Revenue-Assessee cannot be called upon to prove a negative-Addition deleted.[S. 145]

Indravadan Hanjarimal Jain v. Dy. CIT (2025) 127 ITR 352 / 180 taxmann.com 308 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Business expenditure-Bogus purchases-Addition based solely on third-party statements without cross-examination-Not sustainable-Onus discharged by assessee-Burden shifts to Revenue-Addition deleted-Sales accepted-Entire purchases cannot be disallowed-No further addition warranted. [S. 37(1), 142(1), 147, 148]

Usha Satish Salvi v. Asst. CIT (2025) 127 ITR 452 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Search assessment-Unexplained cash expenditure-Assessee failed to establish expenditure incurred on behalf of production house-Addition confirmed.[S.69A, 132, 132(4)]

Dy. CIT v. DSG Papers (P.) Ltd. (2025) 127 ITR 410 (Chd.)(Trib.)

69C : Unexplained expenditure-Computer printouts seized from accountant-No corroborative evidence-Addition deleted-Protective addition-Cash found with accountant-Accountant owning cash-Addition in assessee’s hands not permissible.

Rosha Alloys P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 127 ITR 76 / 175 taxmann.com 622 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 69A: Unexplained money-Unaccounted production-Estimation based on variation in electricity consumption-No evidence of unaccounted purchases or sales-Addition deleted.[S. 132]

Dy. CIT v. DSG Papers (P.) Ltd. (2025) 127 ITR 410 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 69A: Unexplained money-Search and seizure-Parallel invoicing-No corroborative evidence connecting seized material with assessee-Addition deleted-Sales-Under-invoicing-Extrapolation of entire turnover unjustified-Addition restricted. [S. 132]

Gowri Shankar Gupta v. ITO (2025) 127 ITR 595 (Hyd.)(Trib.)

S. 69A: Unexplained money-Cash deposits during demonetisation-Cash balance contrary to Schedule AL-Addition upheld.