Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


ACIT v.Vetrivel Minerals (V.V. Minerals) (2025) 345 CTR 1 / 250 DTR 217 / 174 taxmann.com 110 (Mad)(HC) ACIT v. Vijay Cements (2025) 345 CTR 1 / 250 DTR 217 / 174 taxmann.com 110 (Mad)(HC) Editorial : Vetrivel Minerals (V.V. Minerals) v. ACIT (2021) 323 CTR 766/ 208 DTR 282 (Mad)(HC) set aside, LKS Gold House (P) Ltd & Ors v. Dy CIT (2025) 345 CTR 15/250 DTR 231 (Mad)(HC), approved.

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Writ not maintainable merely on alleged breach of natural justice-Non-grant of cross-examination not a ground to bypass statutory appeal-S. 65B of Evidence Act, 1872 and 63 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 inapplicable to assessment proceedings-CBDT Digital Evidence Investigation Manual, 2014 has no statutory force-Single Judge order set aside.[S. 119, 132,143(3) 246A, Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, S. 63, Evidence Act 1872, S. 65B, Art. 226]

U.K. Paints (Overseas) Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 345 CTR 337 / 251 DTR 289 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 149 : Reassessment-Time limit for notice-Retrospective applicability of S. 149(1)(c)-Explanation inserted by Finance Act, 2012 clarifies that amended sub-ss. (1) and (3) apply to “any assessment year” beginning on or before 1-4-2012-Word “any” not restrictive-Amendment to s. 147 by insertion of Expln. 4 also relevant-Earlier decision in Brahm Datt not considering said Explanation and Notes on Clauses-Matter referred to Chief Justice for constitution of Larger Bench. [S. 147, 148, 149(1)(c), Art. 226]

Nimesh Sharad Shah v. ACIT (2025) 175 taxmann.com 528 / 345 CTR 863 / 252 DTR 212 (Bom)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry and providing opportunity before issue of notice-Faceless collection of information-No challenge to constitutional validity of S. 135A-Disputed factual issues cannot be examined in writ jurisdiction-Reassessment notice upheld and writ petition dismissed. [S. 135A, 148, Art. 226]

VRDV Traders (P.) Ltd. v. UOI (2025) 176 taxmann.com 80 / 345 CTR 729 / 252 DTR 167 (Telangana)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry and providing opportunity before issue of notice-Reopening after approval of resolution plan under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code-Alleged transactions with shell companies for tax evasion-CIRP cannot be used to defeat reassessment proceedings-Writ petition dismissed. [S. 148,148A(b), 148A(d), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, S.31, Art. 14, 19, 226]

Pratishtha Garg v. ACIT (2025) 345 CTR 472 / 250 DTR 383 / 174 taxmann.com 973 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Notice-Limitation-Where the first notice under s. 148 issued on 23-6-2021 (to be treated as notice under s. 148A(b) in view of Ashish Agarwal) was within extended time up to 30-6-2021 under TOLA, the order under s. 148A(d) and consequential second notice under S. 148 were required to be issued within seven days of assessee’s reply; second notice dated 14-7-2022 being beyond limitation, entire proceedings quashed. [S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 149, 151, Art. 226]

Chandra Shekhar v. PCIT (2025) 345 CTR 385 / 251 DTR 315 (Pat)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Limitation-Notice under s. 148A(b) issued on 28-3-2024 within three years is the relevant date for computing limitation-Subsequent notice dated 22-4-2024 issued pursuant to assessee’s reply does not extend or shift limitation-Notice under s. 148 dated 30-4-2024 not barred by limitation. [S. 148, 148A(b), 149(1), Art. 226]

Sejal Jewellery v. UOI (2025) 171 taxmann.com 846 / 345 CTR 681 / 252 DTR 145 (Bom)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Search and seizure-Reasons recorded based on material unearthed during search-Where proceedings are founded on search material, recourse must be taken under sections 153A/153C and not under section 147-Notice issued under section 147 held without jurisdiction. [S. 132, 148, 153A, 153C, Art. 226]

D.D. Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v. UOI (2025) 345 CTR 658 / 251 DTR 100 (Cal)(HC) Editorial : Review petition allowed, order of single judge recalled, D.D. Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v. UOI (2025) 174 taxmann.com 215 / 345 CTR 652 / 251 DTR 93 (Cal)(HC)

S. 147: Reassessment-Alternative remedy-writ petition almost after expiry of one year from the date of passing the impugned assessment order-Writ petition dismissed. [S. 144, 144B, 148, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Lata Goel (2025) 345 CTR 121 / 250 DTR 441 / 174 taxmann.com 535 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Capital gains-Exemption under S. 54F-Investment in a residential house-Separate floors of same house purchased by family members-To be regarded as one residential house-No failure to disclose material facts-Reopening invalid [S. 45, 54F, 260A]

Pharmazell (India) (P) Ltd. v ACIT (2025) 345 CTR 486 / 251 DTR 144 (Mad)(HC) Editorial : Pharmazell (India) (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 345 CTR 478 / 251 DTR 135 / 173 taxmann.com 181 (Mad)(HC), affirmed.

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Deduction claimed twice-Reassessment is justified.[S.37(1), 148, Art. 226]