Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


HCL Technologies Malaysia SDN BHD v. Asst. CIT (IT) (2025) 121 ITR 466 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 9(1)(vii) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Fees for technical services-Non-resident-Revenue sharing arrangement-Payments received by foreign associated enterprise from Indian parent under Master Service Agreement not taxable as fees for technical services-Revenue sharing for services jointly rendered to customers-Additions were deleted. [S. 147, 148 ]

Late Jagdish through L/H Chajju Ram v. ITO (2025) 238 TTJ 315 (Jaipur)(Trib.)

S. 271(1)(c): Penalty-Concealment-Legal Representative-Legal heirs are liable for a penalty to the extent of the estate inherited. [S. 159]

ING Bank NV v. DCIT (IT) (2025) 238 TTJ 1044 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 270A: Penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income-Bona fide explanation-Revised computation filed voluntarily before issue of notice-Penalty not leviable.[S. 195, 194LC, 270A(6)(a)]

Bharatkumar Jaishinh Soni v. ITO (2025) 238 TTJ 1039 / 179 taxmann.com 421 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 270A: Penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income-Wrong claim of exemption under section 10(10AA)-Bona fide legal claim-Penalty deleted. [S. 10(10AA), 270A(9)]

Megnanapuram Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society v. PCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 513 (Chennai)(Trib.).

S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Invalid Reassessment-PCIT cannot revise a reassessment order which is itself void for want of proper sanction under section 151-Reassessment without approval of the competent authority is non est. [147, 148, 148A(d), 151(1)), 151(ii)]

ACIT v. Ramasubbu Minnalkodi (2025) 238 TTJ 337 (Chennai)(Trib.).

S. 253: Appellate Tribunal-Appeals-Respondent can raise jurisdictional ground without filing appeal or cross-objection [S. 254(1), ITAT R. 27]

ITO v. SECL (2025) 238 TTJ 1 (Raipur)(Trib).

S. 251: Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-Remand of matter to Assessing Officer-CIT(A) has no power to remand an appeal to the Assessing Officer except in cases covered by the proviso to section 251(1)(a) i.e., where the assessment is framed under section 144. [.S. 201, 250(6), 251(1)(a)]

Lova Impex (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 238 TTJ 1049 (Hyd.)(Trib.)

S. 249: Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Form of appeal and limitation-Condonation of delay-Two PANs allotted to assessee-Proceedings initiated under old PAN-Sufficient cause established-Delay was condoned-Matter remanded. [S. 147, 148A, 144, 249(3)]

DCIT v. Hindustan Unilever Ltd. (2025) 238 TTJ 947 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 234D: Interest on excess refund-Regular assessment completed before 1-6-2003-Consequential order under section 143(3) read with section 254 does not attract interest. [S. 2(40), 143(3), 147, 153A, 254]

Suzlon Gujarat Wind Park Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 456 / 181 taxmann.com 714 (Ahd.)(Trib.).

S. 244A: Refunds-Interest on refunds-Filing of a revised return to claim additional TDS does not postpone interest on the refund already claimed in the original return filed within time-Where the refund is issued by demand draft, the date of issue of the demand draft is the date of grant of refund. [S. 139(5), 244(1)(a)(i)]