Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Dy.CIT v. Man Prakash Talkies (P) Ltd. (2024) 232 TTJ 673 / 38 NYPTTJ 1272 (Jaipur)(Trib)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment order is quashed. [S. 143(3)]

Dy.CIT v. Man Prakash Talkies (P) Ltd (2024) 232 TTJ 673 / 38 NYPTTJ 1272 (Jaipur)(Trib)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Re assessment is bad in law.[S. 45(2), 148]

Arunkumar Puthige v. ITO (2024) 232 TTJ 342 / 243 DTR 350 / 38 NYPTTJ 1284 (Cochin)(Trib)

S. 145A : Method of accounting in certain cases-Valuation of closing stock-Valuation of Inventories-If the AO add VAT to the closing stock value, then necessarily he has to add VAT amount in the opening stock value also and in that circumstances the net effect will be neutral-Addition of VAT amount to the closing stock value is not sustainable. [S.44AB]

ACIT v. Irulandi Thevar Vetrivel (2024) 232 TTJ 566 / 38 NYPTTJ 1253 (Chennai)(Trib)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Rejection of books of account is justified-Bulk journal entries in the books of account-Provisions of S.40(a)(ia),40A(3) cannot be applied-Companies engaged in the same line of business, have reported profitability in the range of 3 per cent to 9 per cent across these years-The profit of the assessee is to be estimated at 10 per cent of the contractual receipts. [S. 40(a)(ia), 40A(3), 153A]

Srimanta Kumar Shit v. ACIT (2024) 232 TTJ 925 / 38 NYPTTJ 1444 (Kol)(Trib)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Limited scrutiny-Conversion of limited scrutiny into complete scrutiny without prior approval-CBDT Instruction No. 5 of 2016-Assessment is bad in law. [S. 143(2)]

ITO v. Rajkumari (Ms.) (2024) 232 TTJ 1038 / 38 NYPTTJ 1388 (Chenai) (Trib)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Corrigendum to assessment order-Held to be valid-CIT(A) is directed to decide on merits.

Manjulaben Bipinbhai Patel L/H of Late Bipinbhai P. Patel. v. Dy.CIT (2024) 232 TTJ 1 / 243 DTR 57 / 38 NYPTTJ 1158 (Ahd)(Trib)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Copy of statement of foreign bank account is provided-Remand report is obtained-No violation of principle of natural justice-Order of CIT(A) is affirmed.

Manju Mithal v. CIT (A) (2024) 232 TTJ 804 / 243 DTR 145 / 38 NYPTTJ 1208 (Jodhpur)(Trib)

S. 143(1) : Assessment-Intimation-Credit for tax deducted at source-Kachha Artiya-Mismatch in turnover stated in Form No. 26AS and gross total income (commission income) disclosed in the return-CPC has no right to reduce the credit of TDS on the ground that the assessee has not offered the entire income in her return as per Form No. 26AS-the AO is directed to grant full credit of the TDS.[S.143(1)(a)(v), 194Q, 26AS]

Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2024) 232 TTJ 41 (UO) (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 115JB : Company-Book profit-Electricity generating company-Provisions of s. 115JB, as they stood before the amendment by the Finance Act, 2012, do not apply to companies which are engaged in the generation of electricity and governed by the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948.

Hindustan Unilever Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2024) 232 TTJ 861 / 38 NYPTTJ 1420 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 80IB: Industrial undertakings-Income from sale of scraps and by-products-Directed to allow the deduction. [S.80IC]