Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


BNY Mellon International Operations (India) (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 238 TTJ 819 / 181 taxmann.com 222 (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 234C: Interest-Deferment of advance tax-Levy of interest was not available on record; matter remanded to the Assessing Officer. [S.143(3)]

Surbhi Anand v. ACIT (2025) 238 TTJ 672 / 179 taxmann.com 609 (Agra)(Trib.)

S. 199: Deduction at source-Credit for tax deducted-Assessee offering interest on RBI Bonds on an accrual basis is entitled to proportionate TDS credit. [S. 145, R. 37BA]

Naik Naik & Co. v. CIT (Appeals) (2025) 238 TTJ 39 / 179 taxmann.com 168 (Mum.)(Trib.).

S. 199: Deduction at source-Credit for tax deducted-Deductor failed to deposit-Credit cannot be denied-Remanded for verification. [S.205, 234B, 234C, Form No 26AS]

Impress Estates (P.) Ltd. & Ors. v. ACIT (2025) 238 TTJ 1016 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 153D: Assessment-Search-Approval-Mechanical approval without independent application of mind-Assessment invalid. [S. 132, 153A, 153C]

Four Pillar Communications (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 238 TTJ 48 / 175 taxmann.com 1051 (Pune)(Trib.).

S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person-Search–Jurisdiction-Substituting the words “pertains to” for “belongs to” is prospective from 1-6-2015 and does not apply to earlier searches-Assessments were quashed. [S. 132, 153A]

Estate Investment Company (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 585 (Mum)(Trib).

S. 151A: Faceless assessment scheme-Reassessment-Notice-Notice issued by Jurisdictional AO instead of Faceless AO-Notice invalid [S.147, 148]

Rosha Alloys (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 357 / 127 ITR 76 / 175 taxmann.com 622 (Chd.)(Trib.).

S. 151: Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Notice under section 148 invalid where approval under section 151 is mechanical and inconsistent with reasons recorded [S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d)]

Estate Investment Company (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 585 (Mum)(Trib).

S. 147:Reassessment-Manually written DIN-Subsequent generation of DIN-Assessment void-CBDT Circular No. 19/2019. [S. 119, 143(3) 148]

Balajee Infratech & Constructions (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 568 / 179 taxmann.com 420 (Mum)(Trib).

S. 147: Reassessment-Change of opinion-No fresh tangible material-Reopening invalid [S.2(47)(vi), 37(1)]

Yakin Jayantilal Shah v. ITO (2025) 238 TTJ 554 (Ahd)(Trib).

S. 147: Reassessment-Information derived from a search on another person-Reassessment under S. 147 is valid in the absence of seized material.[S.132, 153C]