Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Chaturbhuj Gattani v. ITO (2024) 336 CTR 369 (Raj) (HC) Saroj Gattani v. ITO (2024) 336 CTR 369 (Raj) (HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Supply of information-Information/description has been given to the assessee-Writ petition is dismissed. [S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art.226]

Asamannoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO (2024) 336 CTR 631 (Ker)(HC) Editorial : Affirmed by Division Bench, ITO v. Asamannoor Service Co-operative Bank Ltd (2024)160 taxmann.com 681 / 336 CTR 625 (Ker) (HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Principle of natural justice-Opportunity of hearing-Order and notice is set aside.[S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

ITO v. Asamannoor Service Co-operative Bank Ltd (2024)160 taxmann.com 681 / 336 CTR 625 (Ker) (HC) Editorial : Asamannoor Service Co-operative Bank Ltd v. ITO (2024) 336 CTR 631 (Ker)(HC) is affirmed.

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Show cause notice-Principle of natural justice-Service of show cause notice by itself did not tantamount to a discharge of obligation to provide assessee with an opportunity of being heard-Opportunity to be effective must include a right to a personal hearing as well-Order of Single Judge is affirmed. [S. 148A(b), 148A(d), 148, Art. 226]

Ananda Bag Tea Company Ltd. v. UOI(2024) 336 CTR 827/ 234 DTR 236 (Cal)(HC) Editorial : Ananda Bag Tea Company Ltd. v. UOI (2024)160 taxmann.com 675 / (2024) 336 CTR 824 (Cal) (HC), Division Bench affirmed the order of Single Bench.

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Alternative remedy-Finding of fact-Alternative remedy-Writ petition is dismissed. [S. 148A(b), 148A(d), 148, Art. 226]

Ananda Bag Tea Company Ltd. v. UOI (2024)160 taxmann.com 675 / 336 CTR 824 (Cal) (HC) Editorial : Ananda Bag Tea Company Ltd. v. UOI (2024) 336 CTR 827/ 234 DTR 236 (Cal)(HC), order of Single Bench is affirmed.

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Alternative remedy-Appeal is dismissed-Order of single judge is affirmed.[S. 148A(b), 148A(d), 148, 246A, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Atlanta Capital (P) Ltd. (2024) 336 CTR 748 (SC) CIT v. Chetan Gupta (2024) 336 CTR 748 (SC) Editorial: CIT v. Chetan Gupta (2015) 126 DTR 401 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Monetary limits-Appeal of Revenue is dismissed on account of low tax effect. [S. 268A, Art. 136]

Axis Bank Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 336 CTR 206 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Bad debt-Specific question was raised in the course of assessment proceedings-Change of opinion-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed and set aside.[S.36(1)(vii), 142(1), 148, Art. 226]

Kennametal India Ltd. v. ACIT (2023)154 taxmann.com 439 / (2024) 336 CTR 483 (Karn) (HC)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Appellate Tribunal-Matter is remanded. [S. 92C, 143(3), 254(1), Art. 226]

CWT India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2023)155 taxmann.com 450 / (2024) 336 CTR 497 (Bom) (HC)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Transfer pricing-Computation of arm’s length price-Failure to pass draft assessment order-Assessment order is null and void. [S.92CA(2),92CA(3),]

Himgiri Mining & Projects v. NFAC (2024) 336 CTR 113(Guj) (HC)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Draft assessment order is not passed-Violation of principle of natural justice-Order is quashed and set aside. [Art. 226]