Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Dattaprasad Kamat v. ACIT (2023)458 ITR 201 /153 taxmann.com 702 (Bom)(HC)

S. 2(22)(e) : Deemed dividend-Shareholder-Advances to share holder-Portuguese Civil Code-Companies Act-Concept of common ownership of assets by spouses under Portuguese Civil Code is not applicable-Order of Tribunal affirming the addition is affirmed. [S. 260A, Companies Act, 1956, 150, 152A, Portuguese Civil Code 1867]

Assessing Officer (IT ) v. Nestle SA (2023)458 ITR 756 / 335 CTR 145/(2024) 296 Taxman 580 (SC)

Interpretation of taxing statutes.

S. 90 : Interpretation- Double taxation avoidance agreements – Most favoured nation-DTAA – India – France — Netherlands- Switzerland . [ S.90(1) , Art. 73 ]

Kawaljit Singh v. ACIT (2024) 204 ITD 307 (Chd)( Trib)

S.153A: assessment – Search – Less than 50 lakhs – Assessment beyond six years is bad in law . [ S.69, 132 ]

ITO v. Rekhchand Jain (2024) 204 ITD 333 ( Raipur)( Trib)

S.54B: Capital gains – Land used for agricultural purposes –Investment in new agricultural land – Loan was repaid after sale consideration was received – Order of CIT(A) deleting the addition is affirmed – Cash credits – Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer . [ S. 45 ]

Eaton Power Quality (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2024) 204 ITD 323 ( Chennai) (Trib)

S.37(1): Business expenditure –Non compete fee –Capital expenditure – Entitle to depreciation – Provision for litigation and taxation matter – Matter remanded .[S.32]

Canara Bank v. DCIT (2024) 204 ITD 358 ( Bang )(Trib)

S. 36(1)(viia) :Bad debt-Provision for bad and doubtful debts – Banks -Schedule bank –Average advances of rural branches – Advances outstanding as well as fresh advances are to be considered .

Canara Bank v. DCIT (2024) 204 ITD 358 ( Bang )(Trib)

S. 36(1)(vii) :Bad debt –Banks – Non -Rural branches – Amounts written off – Allowable as deduction.

Canara Bank v. DCIT (2024) 204 ITD 358 ( Bang )(Trib)

S.14A: Disallowance of expenditure – Exempt income – No expenditure is incurred for earning dividend income – Disallowance is not justified . [ R. 8D ]

Hiten Tulshibhai Engineer v. ITO (2024) 204 ITD 98 (Ahd)( Trib)

S.2(14)(iii): Capital asset – Agricultural land –Sale of agricultural land – Purchaser changed the use for commercial purposes – Not assessable as capital gains . [Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Lands ( Amendment ) Act , 1997 ( GT & All) S.63AA,65B]

PCIT v. Shhukla Dairy Pvt Ltd (2023) 457 ITR 145 (Guj)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Cash in excess of Rs.20000-Proper inquiry was conducted-Revision is held to be not valid.[S.40(a)(ia), 40A(3), R.6DD]