Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Asst. CIT v. Kerry Indev Logistics P. Ltd (2025) 131 ITR 100 (Chennai) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Expenditure on movie tickets provided to staff of clients for chairman’s film-Incurred for maintaining good relations with clients-Deduction allowable.

Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd v. Add. CIT (2025) 131 ITR 185 (Hyd.)(Trib)

S. 36(1)(viii): Eligible business-Special reserve-Financial corporation engaged in long-term housing finance-Deduction applicable only to profits from long-term finance for construction or purchase of house for residential purpose-Interest income from loans of term under five years not to be excluded, being from core business-Loans for non-residential purpose not integral part of residential loans-Not eligible for deduction-Income must emanate from eligible undertaking with direct nexus-Surplus funds from housing finance business parked in approved Government securities yielding interest-Direct nexus with core business-Income “derived from” business-Eligible for deduction-Expenditure relating to income not includible in total income-Own funds in excess of investment for earning dividend-Interest cost not to be adjusted against dividend income-Administrative expenditure to be reallocated based on ratio of exempt-income-yielding investments to total average assets-Disallowance of expenditure relating to exempt income-Exemption on interest from tax-free bonds-Own funds in excess of investment-No disallowance warranted.[S. 10(33), 14A, R.8D]

Asst. CIT v. Kerry Indev Logistics P. Ltd (2025) 131 ITR 100 (Chennai) (Trib)

S. 36(1)(va): Any sum received from employees-Deduction only on actual payment-Belated payment of employees’ contribution to provident fund and employees’ State insurance-Disallowance upheld. [S. 2(24)(x), 43B]

Aurobindo Pharma Ltd v Asst. CIT (2025) 131 ITR 15 (Hyd.)(Trib)

S. 35: Expenditure on scientific research-Weighted deduction-Clinical trial expenditure necessarily incurred outside an in-house facility due to the requirement of cooperation from doctors, hospitals, volunteers and patients-Approval granted by DSIR in Form 3CL-Entitled to weighted deduction. [S. 35(2AB) R. 6(7A)]

Suzlon Energy Ltd v.Dy. CIT (2025) 131 ITR 737 (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 32(1): Depreciation-Goodwill-Amalgamation of companies-Excess purchase consideration over net assets recorded as goodwill-Fallacy of Assessing Officer in treating goodwill as transferred from amalgamating to amalgamated company-Goodwill generated only as result of amalgamation, not asset transferred-Statutory provisions relied on inapplicable-Goodwill created as result of amalgamation allowable for depreciation-Appellate Tribunal-Scheme of amalgamation-National Company Law Tribunal’s order approving amalgamation attaining finality-Revenue ought to redress grievance before appropriate forum-Having failed to do so, cannot raise ground before Tribunal. [S. 254(1)]

CIT (Dy.) v. ITD Cementation India Ltd. (2025) 131 ITR 53 (Mum)(Trib.)

S. 28(i): Business loss-Foreseeable losses-Construction Contracts-Percentage of competition method-loss can be claimed in the manner provided under Accounting Standard 7 ‘Construction Contract’-For quantification of loss, the ITAT directed the AO to quantify the claim and allow it in accordance with the law. [S.37(1), AS 7]

Suzlon Energy Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2025) 131 ITR 737 (Ahd) (Trib)

S.14A: Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Book profits-Computation-Assessee’s suo motu disallowance-Further disallowance in computation of book profits under section 115JB unjustified-Addition deleted-Disallowance where entire investment made out of interest-free own funds-No disallowance warranted-CBDT Circular No. 5 of 2014 cannot override express provisions of section 14A-Disallowance not legally tenable-Effect of Explanation inserted by Finance Act, 2022 with effect from 1-4-2022-Amendment prospective, not retrospective-Disallowance for earlier year not tenable-Suo motu disallowance-Assessee’s own interest-free funds in excess of investment-No disallowance warranted-Assessing Officer required to record dissatisfaction with correctness of suo motu disallowance-Non-recording of satisfaction precluding recourse to rule 8D-No further disallowance warranted. [S. 115JB, R. 8D]

ITD Cementation India Ltd v Dy. CIT (2025) 131 ITR 74 (Trib)

S. 14A: Income-Expenditure relating to exempt income-Investment being share of profit in joint venture, current account transaction for loans given-Provision inapplicable-Disallowance rightly deleted. [R. 8D]

Bhup Singh v. ITO (2025) 131 ITR 370 (Chd)(Trib.) Kishori Lal Batra v. ITΟ (2025) 131 ITR 370 (Chd)(Trib.) Suresh Pal Chauhan v. ITΟ (2025) 131 ITR 370 (Chd)(Trib.) Surinder Singh v. ITΟ (2025) 131 ITR 370 (Chd)(Trib.) Mehara Singh Saini v. ITΟ (2025) 131 ITR 370 (Chd)(Trib.)

S. 10(10B): Compensation-Workmen-Voluntary Retirement Scheme on closure of the company-Entitled to exemption-Gratuity-Salary includes gratuity-Relief to be provided under section 89 in taking net gratuity amount. [S 10(10)(C), 17(iii), 89]

Michael Graves Design Group Inc. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 131 ITR 352 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 9(1)(vii): Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Fees for technical services-Non-resident-Fees for included services-Assessee engaged to provide concept drawings and design for statue of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel-No development of technical design or transfer of technical plan-Drawings project-specific, not usable elsewhere-No technical know-how made available-Consideration not taxable as fees for included services in India-DTAA-India-USA [S.90, Art. 14(4)(b)]