Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


SKAPS Industries India (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (IT) (2025) 170 taxmann.com 244 / 121 ITR 9 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 195: Deduction at source-Non-resident-Other sums-Permanent Establishment-Stay of employees less than the prescribed period-No obligation to deduct tax at source-DTAA-India-UK [S. 9(1)(i) 201(IA) Art. 5(2)(k)]

Dy. CIT v. BSR Builders Engineers and Contractors (2025) 121 ITR 626 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Material seized from another person-Addition under section 153A not sustainable. [S. 132, 153A]

Kavita Samtani v. Dy. CIT (2025) 121 ITR 661 / 174 taxmann.com 161 (Jaipur)(Trib.).

S. 153A: Assessment-Search-Assessment of searched person-Search conducted at assessee’s residence-Assessment under section 153A is valid and not under section 153C-Completed assessments-No incriminating material-Transactions already recorded in books and bank statements-Section 68 addition not sustainable.[S. 68, 132, 153C]

Naveen Kumar Singhal v. ITO (2025) 121 ITR 28 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 147: Reassessment-Reassessment cannot be initiated merely on vague ‘high-risk transaction’ information without tangible material. [S 68, 69, 148]

Atiq Ahmed v. ITO (2025) 121 ITR 24 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 147: Reassessment-Scope of reassessment-Addition on issues unconnected with recorded reasons-Reassessment is invalid where the addition made is unrelated to the reasons recorded for reopening. [Ss. 40A(3), 147, Expln. 3]

Aarone Developers P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 121 ITR 21 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 147: Reassessment-Difference in GST and Income-tax Turnover-Addition cannot be sustained merely because turnover declared for GST purposes differs from turnover disclosed in the return, where the assessee furnishes a proper reconciliation explaining the difference.[S. 148]

CIT v. Capseal Vyapaar P. Ltd. (2025) 121 ITR 47 (Guwahati)(Trib.)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Bogus transactions-Change of opinion-Borrowed satisfaction-Lack of application of mind-Reopening invalid. [S. 68, 148, 151]

Devendra Thakershibhai Thakkar v. ITO (2025) 172 taxmann.com 504 / 121 ITR 69 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.).

S. 145: Method of accounting-Rejection of books of account-Estimation of profits-Addition was deleted-Delay in appeal –Delay of 880 days-Delay was condoned. [S. 144, 145(3),253, Rule 46A]

Dy. CIT v. NAPC P. Ltd. (2025) 121 ITR 544 / 174 taxmann.com 105 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 145: Method of accounting-Rejection of Books-Estimation of Profit-Form 26AS Difference-Loan Waiver-One-time settlement. Additions were deleted. [S. 145(3), 28(iv), 41(1), 145(3)]

Dy. CIT v. Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd. (2025) 121 ITR 298 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 144C: Reference to dispute resolution panel-Limitation-Assessment-Transfer Pricing –CBDT Notifications-Assessment was time-barred-Invalid. [S. 143(3), 144B, 144C(3), 153(4)]