Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT v. Trigent Software Ltd. (2023)457 ITR 765 /147 taxmann.com 52 (Bom)(HC)/Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed , PCIT v. Trigent Software Ltd. (2024) 299 Taxman 453 / 464 ITR 770 (SC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Software company-Expenditure on developing new product-New product abandoned as not feasible-Allowable as revenue expenditure.

PCIT v. Nestle India Ltd. (No. 1) (2023)457 ITR 210/153 taxmann.com 150 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Licence fee-Allowable as deduction.

CIT v. Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd (2023)457 ITR 246/(2022) 145 taxmann.com 276 (Mad)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Construction and handing over of transmission lines sub-station-Revenue expenditure.

PCIT v. Nestle India Ltd. (No. 1) (2023)457 ITR 210/153 taxmann.com 150 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 32 : Depreciation-User of asset-Pollution control devices-Order of Tribunal is affirmed.

Bangalore International Airport Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)457 ITR 229/146 taxmann.com 206 / 335 CTR 586(Karn)(HC)

S. 32 : Depreciation-Intangible asset-Leasehold right-Depreciation is allowable.

PCIT v. GGC Constructions Pvt. Ltd. (2023)457 ITR 240 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 28(i) : Business loss-Future and options-Not claimed in the original return-Retraction in the original assessment proceedings-Tribunal affirmed the order of the CIT(A), allowing the claim.[S. 139(5), 154, 260A]

PCIT v. Nestle India Ltd. (No. 1) (2023)457 ITR 210/153 taxmann.com 150 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Not recording satisfaction-Order of Tribunal deleting the addition is affirmed. [R. 8D]

Urban Improvement Trust, Udaipur v. UOI (2023)457 ITR 57/155 taxmann.com 452 (Raj)(HC)

S. 10(46) : Body or Authority-Specified income-Issue concluded by Supreme Court-Matter remanded to Central Board of Direct taxes. [S. 119, Art. 226]

Vodafone Idea Ltd. v. Dy. DIT (IT) (2023)457 ITR 189 /152 taxmann.com 575 / 334 CTR 39 (Karn)(HC) Editorial: Order in Vodafone Idea Ltd. v. Dy. DIT (IT)(2015) 44ITR 330(Bang)(Trib) is reversed.

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Payment to Non-Resident telecommunication operators for provision of bandwidth and inter-connectivity usage-Not royalty-Not liable to deduct tax at source-Expansion of definition of royalty inserted later-Assessee cannot be expected to foresee future amendment at time of payment in earlier assessment y ears-Jurisdiction-No jurisdiction to tax income arising from extra-territorial source-Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement-Sovereign document between two countries-Applicable in Proceedings under Section 201 of the Act-DTAA-India-Belgium. [S. 195]

PCIT v. Ziauddin Walve (Bom)(HC) www.itatonline .org

S. 68 : Cash credits – Long term capital gains – Penny stock –Not subjected to any enquiry by SEBI – Sold through DMAT account – STT paid – Purchased at a rate as low as Rs.2.5/- to Rs.3/- per share and they were sold at a rate extremely as high as Rs.125/- to Rs.185/- per share- Order of Tribunal deleting the addition is affirmed . [ S. 10(38), 45, 260A ]