Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Rahul Sachan v. ITO (2024) 299 Taxman 369 / 466 ITR 353 (All.)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Unexplained money-information flagged under Risk Management Strategy (RMS)-Providing accommodation entries-Existence of information-Reopening of assessment is justified.[S. 69A,148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Coonoor Sri Thanthi Mariamman Kerala Seva Sangam v. AUI (2024) 299 Taxman 470 /468 ITR 155/ (Mad.)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Cash credits-Cash deposited in bank account-Reply was not considered-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is set aside.[S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Rakesh Beniyal v. ITO (Assessment) (2024) 299 Taxman 409 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Cash credits-Bank account was opened without his knowledge-Disputed questions of fact-Writ petition is dismissed. [S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Mahesh Kumar Verma v. UOI (2024) 299 Taxman 141 (All.)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Cash credits-Information which was relied upon by revenue was not completely furnished-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed and set aside. [S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art.226]

Componentsource Company Ltd. v. ACIT(IT) (2024) 299 Taxman 329 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Amount received from sale/resale of shrink-wrapped software-Not royalty or Fees for technical services-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed-DTAA-India-Japan. [S. 9(1)(vi), 9(1)(vii), 148A(b), 148A(d),art.5 Art. 226]

Telenor South Asia Investment Pte. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2024)299 Taxman 232 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Foreign companies-company is a resident of Singapore-Investment in Indian subsidiary-Tax on dividends, royalty and technical services-Capital account transaction-Investments could not be treated as income as same was in nature of capital account transaction not giving rise to any income[S.9(1)((i), 115A, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

PCIT v. Girdhar Gopal Dalmia (2024) 299 Taxman 362 / 464 ITR 393 (SC) Editorial : Girdhar Gopal Dalmia v. UOI (2023) 150 taxmann.com 54/ 451 ITR 320 (Cal)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Cash credits-Information from DDIT(Investigation)-Reassessment notice was quashed by High court-Delay of 399 days-SLP of Revenue is dismissed delay was not sufficiently explained. [S. 68, 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 136]

CIT v. Kesoram Industries Ltd. (2024) 299 Taxman 542 (Cal.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Interest paid and received-Capital receipt-Change of opinion-Reassessment is bad in law. [S. 4, 36(1)(iii), 148, 260A]

Castrol India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024) 299 Taxman 71 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Donation-CSR expenditure-Change of opinion-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 37(1), 80G, 147, 148, Art. 226]

Vedanta Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 299 Taxman 218 (Bom.)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Amalgamation-Reassessment orders passed under section 144 read with section 147 in name of non-existing entity is quashed and set aside.[S. 144, 148, 292B, Art. 226]