S. 69C: Unexplained expenditure -Bogus purchases -Tribunal confirmed 10% of alleged bogus purchases – On appeal High Court deleted the 10% of alleged bogus purchases confirmed by the Tribunal . [ S. 260A ]

S. 115BBC : Anonymous donations – Determination of tax in certain cases – Charitable Trust – Anonymous donations received in the Hundi cannot be taxed under Section 115BBC(1) of the Act – Order of Tribunal is affirmed – No substantial question of law . [ S. 10(23C)(v), 11, 12 ,12A , 80G (5), 115BBC(2)(b), 260A ]

S. 50 :Capital gains – Depreciable assets – Block of assets – Sale of depreciable asset – Long -term capital asset – Short term capital gains- Tax is leviable at 20% as long term under seecti0n 112 of the Act and not at 30% which is applicable to short term capital gains . [ S. 2(11),2(29AA), 2(29B), 2(42A),2(42B), 2(45),43(6), 48, 49,50(1), 50(2), 50A,54,54EC,74, 112 (1)]

S. 154 : Rectification of mistake – Demand appearing in the portal – No communication of order – Rectification order and demand was quashed and set aside – Strictures -Honourable Court also directed the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai (PCCIT) to have an enquiry conducted by a person not below the rank of Additional Commissioner of Income Tax to ascertain how such a demand came to be uploaded in the portal pertaining to petitioner and if there has been any negligence or lapse on the part of any officer, to take such action as the PCCIT will feel necessary against the said officer. [ S. 14A, 115JB, 156, Art. 226 , RTI Act, 2005 S.19(1) ]

S. 264: Commissioner – Revision of other orders – Income wrongly offered to tax and paid taxes – Assessment completed under section 143(1))- Time for filing revised return under section 139(5) has expired – Double addition- Order of Commissioner dismissing the revision application is set aside – Commissioner is directed to allow the claim of the assessee by passing an appropriate order . [S.43B, 139(5), 143(1), Art.226 , 265]

S. 281 : Certain transfers to be void-Recovery of tax-Banks and Financial Institutions-Priority of debts-No provision under Income-Tax Act, 1961 creating charge on property of defaulting assessee-State’s preferential right to recover only over ordinary unsecured creditors-Not entitled to precedence over secured debt in absence of express provisions-No basis to take view of “Doctrine of constitutional priority”–View that charge gets created only when attachment is made is unsustainable-Attachment would not constitute charge-Transfers void as against Department-Overriding effect-Distinction between, mortgage and charge-Crown debt-The orders of attachment passed by the Tax Recovery Officer being subsequent to the mortgage created in favour of the secured creditors is set aside. [S. 226, Recovery Of Debts And Bankruptcy Act, 1993, 31B, Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, S.26E,, Art. 226]

S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions-Wilful attempt to evade tax-Territorial jurisdiction or conspiracy-Accused has no locus standi to file application or raise any objections qua territorial jurisdiction, conspiracy or bias at pre-cognizance stage-Conspiracy cannot be ascertained merely by appreciating either documents or arguments-Issue of fact to be proved or disproved by parties leading evidence during trial-Parties approbating and reprobating and taking mutually destructive pleas is impermissible. [S. 276(1), 277, 278, 278B, 278E, Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.120B, 191, 199, 200, 204, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, S.200, 482]

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Delay of 1560 days (4 years and 100 days)-No reason was given for delay-Appeal is dismissed. [S. 254(1)]

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Procedure-Application-Infrastructure Development-Works contractor, Settlement Commission after extensive discussion recording finding-Finding of fact-Writ petition is dismissed.[S.80IA(4), Art. 226]

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Procedure-Application-Infrastructure Development-Works contractor, Settlement Commission after extensive discussion recording finding-Finding of fact-Writ petition is dismissed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed.[S.80IA(4), Art. 136]