Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


GRR Holdings v. Dy.CIT (2024) 231 TTJ 249 / 38 NYPTTJ 991 (Hyd) (Trib)

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-Revision-Revision order is set aside by the Tribunal-Issue subject matter of consideration or examination by a higher authority in the rank of hierarchy, the lower authority in the rank or the authority exercising equal powers cannot sit in judgment over the order passed by the higher authorities-The powers exercised by the CIT(A) under s. 251(1) to enhance the assessment towards consideration paid for purchase of property in the hands of the assessee is beyond the scope of the powers of the CIT(A)-Investment in purchase of property-Capital contribution by partners-Addition is deleted. [S.69, 153A, 251(1), 263]

S.K. Sharma Contractor v. ITO (2024) 231 TTJ 354/ 239 DTR 161 / 38 NYPTTJ 689 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 246A : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Appealable orders-Appeal-Non-disposal of rectification application within period of six months-Quantum od refund-AO is directed to entertain the said application under s. 154 and dispose it of as per law after verification of records. [S. 154(8),244A]

Avia Xpert (P) Ltd. v ITO (2024) 231 TTJ 310 / 241 DTR 161 / 38 NYPTTJ 1031 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Mistake apparent from the record-Order passed by the CPC without issuing any prior notice/intimation-Disallowance of PF /ESI-Jurisdictional High Court in favour of assessee-Adjustment is bad in law. [S.36(1)(va)]

Satya Sankalp Villa (Ellisbridge) (P) Ltd. v. ITO (2024) 231 TTJ 678 / 38 NYPTTJ 833 (Ahd)(Trib)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Recording of satisfaction-The documents were transmitted to the AO of the assessee, based on which he had rightly initiated the proceeding under S. 153C-The law is amendment of S. 153C w.e.f. 1st Oct., 2014-Incriminating material is found-Assessment is valid-Payment made to tenant is not in respect of said plot-Full consideration is assessable as income. [S. 132]

Sunil Chablani v. CIT (IT) (2024) 231 TTJ 361 / 38 NYPTTJ 1009 (Jodhpur)(Trib)

S. 148: Reassessment-Notice-Non-resident-Non jurisdictional AO-Revenue could not demonstrate that when the notice was issued on 30th March, 2022, ITO, Ajmer, had valid jurisdiction over the assessee-Reassessment is quashed.[S. 147]

Kaushik Pra Vinchandra Gohel v. AO (2004) 231 TTJ 1 (UO) (Ahd)(Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Cash deposit-Substantial cash deposit-Return not filed-Reassessment notice is valid. [S. 68,115BBE, 148]

Sundip Kumar Gupta v.Dy.CIT (2024) 231 TTJ 113 / 241 DTR 65 / 38 NYPTTJ 899 (Kol)(Trib)

S. 147: Reassessment-Report of Investigation Wing-No tangible material-Reassessment is bad in law-Cash credits-Identity and creditworthiness is established-Addition is deleted. [S.68 148]

Mangaldeep Multistate Urban Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 231 TTJ 588 / 241 DTR 105 / 38 NYPTTJ 607 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 147: Reassessment-Survey-Facilitating dubious transactions by accepting huge cash deposits from suspicious/unidentified entities and thereafter transferred most of these amounts to various other suspicious entities-Reassessment notice is valid.[S.133A, 148]

VTP Mohite Associates v. Dy.CIT (2024) 231 TTJ 282 / 38 NYPTTJ 834 (Pune)(Trib)

S: 145: Method of accounting-Project completion method-Advance from customers-Sale of 54 units-Neither sales were effected nor the possession of the flats were handed over to the purchasers during the relevant year-CIT(A) was not justified in sustaining the ad hoc addition of 10 per cent of the agreed value of the flats and also ad-hoc disallowance of common expenses. [S. 4, 37(1)]

Kluber Lubrication India (P) Ltd. v. DCIT (2024) 231 TTJ 329 / 241 DTR 113 / 38 NYPTTJ 990 (Bang)(Trib)

S. 143(1) : Assessment-Intimation-Prima facie adjustment-Inclusion of excise duty in the turnover for determining rate of tax-The adjustment made while processing the return is not sustainable. [S. 44AB,143(1)(a), 145A]