S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Property held for charitable purposes-Application of accumulated income-AO failed to examine said issue during assessment proceedings, CIT(E) rightly set aside matter to file of AO for making a de novo assessment.[S.11(2), 11(3), 11(3)(d), 143(3)]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Rental income from a property-Investment-Income from house property-Assessable as income from house property and not as business income-Revision order is set aside. [S. 23, 28(i), 23, 143(3)]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Capital gains-Interest-Enhanced compensation on compulsory acquisition Act 1894-Debatable-Revision is not valid. [S. 10(37), 143(3), Land Acquisition Act, 1894, S. 28]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Death of assessee-No specific statutory provision under Income tax law which require legal heirs to intimate department about death of assessee-Assessment is not valid-Invalid assessment order could not be revised. [S.50C, 143(3)]

S. 254(2A) : Appellate Tribunal-Stay-Three adjournments were sought by Revenue-Failure to comply with the provisions of section 13A-Stay application is rejected [S.13A, 226, 254(1)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Appeals-Unexplained cash credits-Share application-Delay of 24 days-Neither affidavit nor delay is explained-Appeal is dismissed as time barred.[S. 68, 254(1)]

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Appeals-Delay of 17 days-Appeal fees was paid before due date of filing-No reasonable explanation for delay-Appeal is dismissed. [S. 54F]

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Appeals-Condonation of delay of 7 years and 104 days-Lapse on part of counsel-Appeal is dismissed as time barred. [S.119, 254(1)]

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-Delay of 51 days condoned-Ex-parte order-Gifts-Matter is remanded to the file of CIT(A) to decide on merits. [S.56(2) (vii)(b), 253]

S. 234B : Interest-Advance tax-Search-Cash and fixed deposit receipts-Releasee of seized assets-Application was made for release / adjustment of cash and FRSs-No interest can be levied in the course of regular assessment-Payment of interest on seized FDRs)-FDRs cannot be treated as money as referred in section 132B(4)(b) and since by mere seizure of FDRs, assessee had not suffered any pecuniary loss by way of loss of interest, no interest under section 132B(4) could be granted to assesse.[S. 132, 132B(4)(b)]