Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Shah Foils Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 130 ITR 198 (Ahd(Trib.)

S. 69A: Unexplained money-Addition cannot be made on the entire value of alleged unaccounted sales-Only the profit element embedded in such sales is taxable, even where the existence of clandestine sales is established through seized documents and corroborative third-party statements-Estimation of profit at 6% by the CIT(A) was held to be reasonable. [S. 69A, 147]

ITO v. Express Tradelink (P.) Ltd. (2025) 130 ITR 282 (Kol.)(Trib.) Editorial: Affirmed in PCIT v. Express Tradelink (P.) Ltd. [2026] 309 Taxman 369 (Cal.)(HC).

S. 68: Cash credits-Once the assessee establishes the identity and creditworthiness of the shareholders and the genuineness of the transaction, the burden shifts to the Assessing Officer. Addition was deleted.

Feather Infotech (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 130 ITR 1 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 68: Cash credits-Purchase expenditure cannot be assessed as unexplained cash credit or unexplained expenditure where the source of payment is not disputed. [S. 69C, 250]

ACIT v. Iqbal Ali Khan [2024] 158 taxmann.com 377 / (2025) 130 ITR 576 (Hyd.)(Trib.)

S.54F: Capital gains-Investment in a residential house-Construction of mosque not a residential house-Not entitled to exemption. [S. 45]

K.P. Muhammed Ali v. ITO (IT) (2025) 130 ITR 271 (Cochin)(Trib.)

S. 45: Capital gains-Transfer-Any transaction by way of becoming a member-Joint Development Agreement (JDA)-Unregistered JDA/GPA can still constitute transfer under section 2(47)(vi)-Transfer of 62% land in exchange for 38% developed area taxable in year of agreement-The matter was remanded only for recomputation of capital gains in accordance with sections 48 and 50C. [S. 2(47)(vi), 48, 50C]

Kolte Patil Developers Ltd. (erstwhile Bellflower Properties P. Ltd.) v. Dy. CIT (2025) 130 ITR 505 (Trib.)

S.43CA: Transfer of assets-other than capital assets-Full value of consideration-stock in trade-Agreement value-Stamp valuation-Where part consideration is received by account payee cheque on the date of agreement, stamp duty value as on the date of agreement has to be adopted-No addition. Ss. 43CA(3), 43CA(4)[S. 43CA(3), 43CA(4), 50C]

Vishal Exports Overseas Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2025) 130 ITR 394 (Ahd)(Trib.)

S. 41(1): Profits chargeable to tax-Remission or cessation of trading liability-Outstanding liability cannot be taxed merely because it has become time-barred under the Limitation Act-In the absence of remission or cessation of liability, section 41(1) cannot be invoked. [S. 145]

Kolte Patil Developers Ltd. (erstwhile Bellflower Properties P. Ltd.) v. Dy. CIT (2025) 130 ITR 505 (Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Compensation paid for surrender of rights is not interest-Disallowance is not justified. [S. 194A]

TPF Getinsa Euroestudios S. L. v. Asst. CIT (IT) (2025) 130 ITR 551 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Reimbursement of professional fees and expatriate salary costs to a foreign AE is not liable to TDS where payments do not satisfy the ‘make available’ test under the DTAA and salary costs are reimbursed on a cost-to-cost basis without any profit element.-Not liable to deduct tax at source [S. 9(1)(i), 195]

Bayer Crop Science Ltd. (Successor to Monsanto India Ltd.) v. Dy. CIT (2025) 130 ITR 679 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Employees’ Stock Option Plan (ESOP)-Discount on ESOP-Ascertained liability-Deduction allowable.