S. 144 : Best judgment assessment –Non service of notice-Principle of natural justice-New PAN card-Change of address uploaded-Order and penalty notices are quashed and set aside. [S. 271(1)(b), 271 (1)(c), Art. 226]
S. 144 : Best judgment assessment –Non service of notice-Principle of natural justice-New PAN card-Change of address uploaded-Order and penalty notices are quashed and set aside. [S. 271(1)(b), 271 (1)(c), Art. 226]
S. 143(3): Assessment-Cash credits-Share application money-Recovery-National Company Law Tribunal admitted insolvency petition against assessee-Revenue in terms of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 had not lodged its claim with RP-Revenue could not enforce assessment order and demand notice. [S. 68, 156, 220, 271AAC 272A(1)(d), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and regulation 7 of the Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 S. 31]
S. 143(3): Assessment-limited scrutiny-Conversion into complete scrutiny-Derogation to Instruction No. 5 of 2016, dt. 14th July, 2016-Order of Tribunal quashing the addition is affirmed-No substantial question of law.[S. 119, 142(1), 143(2), 260A]
S. 143(3): Assessment-Amalgamation-Revised return-Change of address-Mistake committed by assesseee-Giving old address instead of new address and email-Matter is remanded. [S. 115BBE, 127, 144B, 282, Art. 226]
S. 139 : Return of income-Revised return after amalgamation-Effect of order of Tribunal or Court in respect of business reorganisation-Provisions of section 170A, as inserted by Finance Act, 2022, would not apply for assessment year 2021-22, but for and from assessment year 2022-23.[S. 139(5), 170, 170A, Art. 226]
S. 132 : Search and seizure –Block assessment-Validity of search proceedings-Satisfaction note was not produced before the Court in spite of specific direction given by the Court-All proceedings including the prosecution are quashed-Court also observed that the order does not preclude the Revenue from taking any such proceedings as they may be so advised and to utilise the information or material in such proceedings against the assessee as is permissible in law. [S. 132, 153A, 158BC, 158BFA, 276C, 277, 278B, Art. 226]
S. 127 : Power to transfer cases-From ITO, Udaipur to ITO, Kozhikode-Opportunity of hearing is not given-Order and notice is quashed and set aside. [Art.226]
S. 115BAA : Tax on income of certain domestic companies-Determination of tax in certain cases-Failure to file Form No.10IC electronically-Higher rate of tax-Directed to move an appropriate application before CBDT for granting leave to file Form No. 10IC. [S. 119(2)(b), Art. 226]
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Specified domestic transaction–PLI vis-a-vis extra-ordinary item-Solar test activity was an extraordinary item and was not part of the regular business of assessee and there was impairment of asset and therefore it had to be excluded for arriving at PLI-No substantial question of law.[S. 260A]
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Specified domestic transaction-Comparables, functional similarity-Software products and services-Selected company dealt in software product and high-end technical services which fell under umbrella of knowledge Process Outsourcing (KPO) services, said company had to be excluded from array of comparables as assessee was rendering software development services-No substantial question of law.[S. 260A]