Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT v. Shapoorji Pallonji and Co Ltd [2024] 164 taxmann.com 707 (Bom.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue rejected, PCIT v. Shapoorji Pallonji and Co Ltd (2024) 300 Taxman 182(SC)

S.14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Mixed funds-Where both interest-free and interest-bearing funds are available with an assessee, it is to be presumed that investments are made from the interest-free funds-no disallowance of interest was warranted under either section 14A or section 36(1)(iii). [S. 36(1)(iii), 115JB]

CIT, (LTU) v. Reliance Industries Ltd. [2024] 161 taxmann.com 423 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 14A : Expenditure in relation to exempt income-AO’s satisfaction-Disallowance without recording reasons for dissatisfaction with assessee’s suo motu disallowance is invalid-Order of Tribunal affirmed.[S. 260A, R. 8D]

CIT (E) v. Maharashtra Academy of Engineering and Educational Research [2024] 161 taxmann.com 290 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Denial of exemption-Violation of S. 13-Denial of exemption under S. 11 is restricted only to that income of the trust which was used for the benefit of prohibited persons, and not to the entire income of the trust. [S. 13]

ACIT v. Sociedade de Fomento Industrial (P.) Ltd. [2024] 164 taxmann.com 139 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 9(1)(vii) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Fees for technical services-Retrospective amendment-No liability to deduct tax at source on payments to non-residents which became taxable only by a subsequent retrospective amendment to the Income-tax Act, 1961-Not liable to deduct tax at source. [S. 195, 260A]

Chandrakant C. Mishra v. UOI [2023] 154 taxmann.com 206 (Bom.)(HC)

Right of Persons with Disability Act, 2016.

S. 76 : Service Matter-Promotion –Post of Tax Assistant-Restoration of disability status-Retrospective Promotion-Subsequent acquisition of eligibility does not entitle employee to retrospective promotion from a date when he was not eligible. [S. 2(t), (p), (r) (e), 57]

Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. Manakchand Laxman Baheti [2023] 156 taxmann.com 411 (Bom.) (HC)

Chartered Accountants Act, 1949

S. 21 : Professional misconduct-False certificates-Due diligence-Chartered Accountant assisting companies in availing bank loans by issuing false valuation certificates without any supporting documents or verification-Held that issuing such certificates knowing that banks rely on them for due diligence is a fraud on the banks and amounts to professional misconduct-Respondent reprimanded. [S. 21(6)(b), 22, Sch. II, Part-I, Cl. (7), (8)]

Perfect Circle Victor Ltd v. UOI [2023] 156 taxmann.com 341 (Bom.)(HC)

Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020

S. 4 : Filing of declaration-Rejection of declaration-An appeal is not considered ‘pending’ for purpose of Act if appellate authority has refused to condone delay in filing it-Appeal was rejected by Tribunal, High Court and SLP also rejected. [S. 143(3), Art. 226]

CIT v. Alcon Resort Holding Ltd [2023] 151 taxmann.com 98 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 250 : Appeal-CIT(A)-Procedure-Additional evidence-Admission under Rule 46A-Order obtained after assessment proceedings-Constitutes sufficient cause; evidence going to root of matter-Admission without remand is justified. [S. 246A, 251; Income-tax Rules, 1962, R. 46A; Expenditure-tax Act, 1987, S. 3, 4]

Karmayogi Ankushrao Tope Samarth SSK Ltd. v. PCIT [2023] 150 taxmann.com 316 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 226 : Collection and recovery-Modes of recovery-Pendency of appeal before CIT (A)-Reassessment-Writ remedy-Where statutory appeal against reassessment is pending, High Court will not examine validity of notice under section 148 or reassessment order-Stay order directing 20 per cent deposit passed on consent is not arbitrary. [S. 147, 148, 246A, Art. 226]

Jayant Umakant Mamidwar v. UOI [2023] 152 taxmann.com 195 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery of tax-Assessee deemed in default-Stay of demand-High-pitched assessment-Local High-Pitched Committee-Pendency of appeal before CIT(A)-Conditional stay on pre-deposit of 20 per cent in instalments held reasonable; denial of out-of-turn hearing upheld. [S. 246A, Art. 226]