Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Vaneet Gupta v. ITO (2025) 128 ITR 352 (Chd.)(Trib.).

S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Issue already examined during assessment -Proceedings initiated on basis of audit objection -Fresh issues beyond limitation -Revision invalid on legal and merits. [S. 143(3), 147, 148]

Western India Cashew Co. (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT (2025) 128 ITR 712 (Chennai)(Trib.).

S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Twin conditions of “erroneous” and “prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue” mandatory -Revision on payment of bonus to director quashed. [S. 40A(2)(b)]

Ajar Amar Steels v. PCIT (2025) 128 ITR 323 (Chd) (Trib.).

S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Partnership firm -Remuneration to partner -Minor typographical error in partnership deed -Revision not justified-Delay in filing of appeal was condoned. [S.40(b), 253(5), 254(1)]

J. P. Morgan Chase Bank, NA v. JCIT (2025) 128 ITR 291 [SB] (Mum)(Trib.)

S. 255: Appellate Tribunal -Procedure -Functions-No prohibition requiring a Special Bench as a rule to stay its hands when a similar/identical issue is pending before the High Court-Special Bench can proceed to hear and decide the appeal in accordance with law. [S. 14A,158A, 250]

ITO v. A. K. Exports (2028) 128 ITR 572 (Chd)(Trib)

S. 254(1): Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Additional evidence -Revenue produced additional evidence -Matter was remanded to the file of CIT(A) for de novo adjudication. [68, 69C, 80IB, 148]

Arun Kumar Gupta v. Asst. CIT (2025) 128 ITR 186 (Surat)(Trib.).

S. 251: Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals) -Powers-Duty to adjudicate jurisdictional grounds -Matter remanded where legal grounds not decided before setting aside assessment. [S. 144, 147, 148, 250, 254]

Geethika Enterprises v. ITO (2025) 128 ITR 556 (Hyd.)(Trib.).

S. 249: Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Form of appeal and limitation-Condonation of delay -Ex parte assessment -Matter remanded for fresh adjudication. [S. 143(3), 221(1), 271(1)(c)]

Navratan Management P. Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2025) 128 ITR 100 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 153D: Assessment-Search-Approval-Mechanical approval-Multiple approval on other group cases -Non-application of mind -Order was quashed. [S. 132, 153A]

Sai Chandra Construction Co. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 128 ITR 493 (Delhi)(Trib.).

S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Undisclosed contract receipts -Estimation of profit at 8% upheld-Addition was deleted. [S. 44AD, 132(1)]

Pushpanjali Construction (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 128 ITR 201 (Trib.).

S. 153C: Assessment of person other than searched person -Satisfaction note -Addition on basis of unacted seized agreement -Invalid approval under section 153D -Entire assessment quashed. [S. 69C, 132, 143(3), 153D]