Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Kamineni Health Services (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 213 ITD 130 (Hyd) (Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Share application money-Sister concern-Disallowance of interest is not justified-Borrowed money–transferred to sister concern. The Assessing Officer was directed to levy interest; however, only for the actual period of the loan, i.e., for one day.

Vardhman Polytex Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 213 ITD 594 (Chd) (Trib.)

S. 35 : Expenditure on scientific research-Bogus Donation-IMSRF was not notified under section 35(1)(ii), deduction claimed by assessee was disallowed-Reopening of assessment was affirmed.[S.35(1)(ii), 147, 148]

ACIT v. Mcfills Enterprises (P.) Ltd. (2025) 213 ITD 573 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 32: Depreciation-Amalgamation-Goodwill-If consideration paid by the amalgamated company to the amalgamating company is more than the net assets acquired by it, then the differential amount shall be treated as goodwill, and the amalgamated company shall be eligible for a claim of depreciation on such goodwill. [S.2(IB),43(1)]

Appasaheb Nalawade Gadhinglaj Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 213 ITD 569 (Pune) (Trib.)

S. 32 : Depreciation-Lease of factory-Allowed earlier years-Allowed the depreciation.

Ramesh Dungarshi Shah. v. DCIT (2025) 213 ITD 96 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 23: Income from house property-Annual value-Stock-in-trade-Notional rent has to be determined on vacant unsold flats held as stock-in-trade as ‘Income from house property-No addition could be made to the assessment year before assessment year 2018-19 on such notional rent. [S. 22, 23(4)(b), 23(5)]

ACIT v. Delhi Buildwell (P.) Ltd. (2025) 213 ITD 291 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 22: Income from house property-Rent reimbursed to purchasers-Not assessable in the hands of assessee.[S. 23]

Parasmal Ravindra Kumar. v. ITO (2025) 213 ITD 276 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S.14A: Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Disallowance cannot exceed the exempt income.[R.8D]

Medeng Unicus Society. v. ITO (E) (2025) 213 ITD 699 (Visakha) (Trib.)

S. 12AB: Procedure for fresh registration-Violation of the principle of natural justice-Rejection of application without giving specific reasons-Order of CIT(E) was set aside, and the matter was remanded to adjudicate the application afresh. [S. 12A]

Aareev Foundation. v. CIT (E) (2025) 213 ITD 661 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 12AB: Procedure for fresh registration-Denial of registration-Application was filed beyond the date specified in law-Rejection of application was affirmed.[S. 11]

NSDC Skill Impact Trust. v. CIT(E) (2025) 213 ITD 629 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 12AB: Procedure for fresh registration-Promote skill development-Charging 10 per cent management fee-Eligible for registration and exemption under section 80G of the Act.[S.80G]