Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Sharp Business System (Through Finance Director Mr. Yoshihisa Mizuno) v. CIT (2026) 484 ITR 509/308 Taxman 285 /348 CTR 1 / 257 DTR 49 (SC) Editorial : Sharp Business System v. CIT (2026) 484 ITR 496 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 36(1)(iii): Interest on borrowed capital-Advance to subsidiary-investment made for acquiring controlling interest in associate concern-Commercial expediency-Allowable as deduction.

Sharp Business System v. CIT (2026) 484 ITR 496 (Delhi) (HC) Editorial : Sharp Business System (Through Finance Director Mr. Yoshihisa Mizuno) v. CIT (2026) 484 ITR 509/ 308 Taxman 285 (SC), allowed as revenue expenditure.

S. 32 : Depreciation-Intangible asset-Non-compete agreement-Right in personam-Not an intangible asset-Depreciation not allowable on non-compete fees.[S. 32(1)(ii)]

Jindal Equipment Leasing Consultancy Services Ltd. v. CIT (2026) 484 ITR 641 (SC) Editorial : CIT v. Nalwa Investment Ltd (2020) 427 ITR 229 (Delhi)(HC), affirmed.

S. 28(i) : Business income-Capital gains-Two provisions operate in distinct and independent fields-Mere receipt not sufficient to attract charge Commercial realisability required-Shares received on amalgamation-Shares held as stock-in-trade Nature of stock-in-trade wholly different from investment-No exception contemplated in case of business assets-Shares received on amalgamation-Shares held as stock-in-trade-Profit taxable as business profits-Burden on department to establish and Tribunal to apply the principles to evidence on record-Charge attracted only upon allotment of new shares-Not on appointed date or date of court sanction. [S. 2(1B), 2(14), 2(47), 28, 45(1), 47(vii) Art. 136]

PCIT v. Alchemist Ltd. [2024] 167 taxmann.com 284 /(2026) 484 ITR 48 (Delhi)(HC) PCIT v. UNO Menda Ltd [2024] 167 taxmann.com 284 /(2026) 484 ITR 48 (Delhi)(HC)

S.14A: Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Disallowance is not attracted where there is no income exempt from tax-Disallowance is restricted to the extent of exempt income-Finance Bill, 2022, declaring that amendment to take effect from 1-4-2022 and accordingly applies in relation to assessment year 2022-2023 and subsequent assessment years-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [R.8D]

Give Foundation v. JCIT (2026) 484 ITR 602 /308 Taxman 38 (Guj)(HC)

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Tribunal affirmed and applied proviso to section 2(15) to disentitle exemption under sections 11 and 12-Assessment year under consideration expenditure exceeded donations and no retention of income but deficit of seven per cent-Proviso to section 2(15) not attracted and denial of exemption unsustainable. [S. 2(15), 12AA]

Manugraph India Ltd. v. ACIT (Mum.)(Trib.) www.itatonline.org .

S. 37(1): Business expenditure – Scientific research expenditure – Expenditure not approved by DSIR for weighted deduction – Ordinary deduction allowable if expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for business – Deduction allowed u/s 37(1).[ S. 35(2AB ) ]

Manugraph India Ltd. v. ACIT (Mum.)(Trib.) www.itatonline.org .

S. 37(1): Business expenditure – Rent paid to directors for farmhouse used for accommodation of foreign customers – Business purpose partly established – Personal use not ruled out – Disallowance restricted to 50 per cent. [ S.40A(2)(b) ]

Manugraph India Ltd. v. ACIT (Mum.)(Trib.) www.itatonline.org

S. 14A: Disallowance of expenditure relating to exempt income – For the purpose of Rule 8D, only investments which have actually yielded exempt income during the year can be considered – No disallowance of interest where own funds exceed investments – Presumption that investments are made out of interest-free funds. [R. 8D(2)(ii), 8D(2)(iii)]

Sameena Shamsuddin Sayed v. ITO (Mum.)(Trib.) www.itatonline.org .

S. 69: Unexplained investments – Property purchased in the name of daughter – Entire consideration paid directly by father from disclosed bank account out of natural love and affection – Identity of father, payment trail and source of funds established – Absence of formal gift deed cannot justify addition – Addition deleted. [S. 148A, 147, 115BBE]

Gaurav Kumar Chopra v. UOI (2025) 483 ITR 324 (Cal)(HC)

Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015.
S. 4: Undisclosed foreign income and assets-Offences and prosecution-Personal appearance of accused Effect of section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure-Discretion to dispense with personal appearance Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of tax Act, 2015-Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S. 205.