Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


K. M. Mammen v. Dy. CIT (2022)445 ITR 220 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions-Wilful attempt to evade tax-Limitation for filing Criminal Complaint-Concealment of income in Foreign Bank-Economic offence-No limitation prescribed-Economic Offences (Inapplicability of Limitation Act) Act, 1974-Evidentiary value of documents —Authenticity of documents would be decided by Trial Court-Powers of High Court-No power to review or alter order once signed-Clarification seeking dispensation with appearance of assessee in Trial Court-Assessee to seek remedy before Trial Court. [S. 131, 148, to quash 250(6) 273A, 276(1), 277,279(1A), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, S. 205, 362, 482 Economic Offences (Inapplicability of Limitation Act, 1974, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, S. 78(6)]

Income-Tax Department v. Jenious Clothing Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 445 ITR 210/ 212 DTR 196/ 326 CTR 356 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 276B : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to pay to the credit tax deducted at source-Company-Principal Officer-Notice must be served on Principal Officer of company —Notice held to be not valid-Order of Trial Court set aside. [S. 2(35), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.S. 245]

Noorjahan (Mrs.) v. Dy. CIT (2022) 445 ITR 17 / 215 DTR 209/ 327 CTR 768 /287 Taxman 422 (Mad.)(HC) AMK Solutions Private Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 445 ITR 17// 215 DTR 209/ 327 CTR 768 / 287 Taxman 422 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions-Wilful attempt to evade tax-Presumption of culpable mental state-Delay in paying self assessment tax-Tax and interest paid before filing of complaint-Launching of prosecution malicious and in valid. [S. 140A, 276(2), 278E]

Noorjahan (Mrs.) v. Dy. CIT (2022) 445 ITR 17 / 215 DTR 209/ 327 CTR 768 /287 Taxman 422 (Mad.)(HC) AMK Solutions Private Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 445 ITR 17 / 215 DTR 209/ 327 CTR 768 / 287 Taxman 422 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions-Wilful attempt to evade tax-Presumption of culpable mental state-Delay in paying self assessment tax-Tax and interest paid before filing of complaint-Launching of prosecution malicious and in valid. [S. 140A, 276(2), 278E]

Aurolab Trust v. NFAC (2022) 445 ITR 645 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Charitable trust-Denial of exemption-Show cause notice for issue of concealment penalty-Alternative remedy-Writ is not maintainable. [S. 11, 12, 12A, 274, Art. 226]

Gopalakrishnan Rajkumar v. PCIT (2022) 445 ITR 577/ 214 DTR 235 /330 CTR 659(Mad.)(HC) Gopalakrishnan Ravim v. PCIT (2022) 445 ITR 577/ 214 DTR 235/330 CTR 659 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Abatement of proceedings-Settlement of Dispute-Revision proceedings initiated abate-Revision held to be not valid. [Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, Art. 226]

West Palm Developments LLP v. ACIT (2022) 445 ITR 511 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Jurisdiction of Tribunal confined to subject matter of appeal-Question before Tribunal regarding extent of deduction-Tribunal does not have power to disallow entire deduction. [S. 36(1)(iii), 57(iii)]

Geojit BNP Paribas Financial Services Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022) 445 ITR 662 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Deletion of penalties by the CIT(A) without obtaining remand report-Order remand-Held to be justified-Certain observation are deleted. [S. 271D, 271E, R. 46A]

CIT v. Shri Venkatachalapathy Education and Charitable Trust (2022)445 ITR 214/ 288 Taxman 49 /(2023) 331 CTR 586 (Mad.)(HC).

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Duties-Procedure for registration-Trust or institution-Activities Order of Tribunal granting registration without considering whether activities of trust charitable-Order not valid-Matter remanded to Tribunal. [S. 11(4), 11(4A), 12AA]

Rajendra Kumar v. ACIT (2022) 445 ITR 622 / 215 DTR 1/ 327 CTR 116 / 287 Taxman 625 (Raj.)(HC)/Editorial: Cost of Rs 50000 imposed by the High Court is seta side , ACIT v. Rajendra Kumar (2023) 295 Taxman 407 (SC)

S. 245 : Refunds-Set off of refunds against tax remaining payable-Recovery of tax-Must be given information regarding proposed adjustment-Strictures-For not obeying and considering the judgments of the Supreme Court, as well as the provisions of sections 220(6) and 245 of the Act and the circulars of the Department Cost of Rs 50000 was imposed on the Assessing Officer to be deposited with the Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority. [S. 220(6), 222, 223, 246A, Customs Act, 1962 S. 129(e), 235(f), Art. 14, 19, 265]