S. 88 : Settlement of tax payable – Notice of demand – Petition against notice of demand -No due certificate was issued – Summary dismissal -No dues – Certificate under Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme – Order of High Court not stating facts or adverting to contentions of parties -Order set aside. [S. 92, ITACT, S. 156, Art. 136, Art, 226]

S. 10(1) : Undisclosed Foreign Income or Assets -Interpretation – Fiscal statutes and in determining the tax liability, strict rules of interpretation – Notice issued beyond 30 Days of receiving information- Search and seizure – Response not filed -Enquiry cannot be truncated at stage of issue of notice – Guidelines issued by Central Board Of Direct Taxes -Information and Intelligence -Notice is valid -Writ petition is dismissed.[S. 8(1), 8(2), Income -tax Act, S. 132, 232(4), 153A, Art. 226]

S. 10(1) : Undisclosed Foreign Income or Assets-No Evidence of undisclosed Foreign income -Notice Issued Under Black Money Act is not valid-High Court can quash a notice if issued without jurisdiction-Interpretation of Taxing Statutes -Strict Interpretation. [S. 8(1), 8(2), Income -tax Act, S. 132, 232(4), 153A, Art. 226] Constitution Of India, Art. 226.

S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions – Wilful attempt to evade tax –
Application for bail -Time to surrender before Trial court and consider the application for bail -SLP of the assessee is dismissed. [S. 276(2) 278EE, Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973, S. 482. [Art. 136, 226]

S. 271C : Penalty – Failure to deduct at source -Failure or delay in remittances of tax deducted at source -Attracts interest and prosecution- No provision for levy of penalty- Interpretation Of Taxing statutes -Penal provisions -Strict construction. [S. 115O(2), 194B, 201(1A), 271C, 276B]

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty -Concealment -Cash sales – Value Added Tax Authorities accepting cash Sales- Independent finding of fact that the assessee had introduced unaccounted income as cash sales —Inaccurate particulars of income -Levy of penalty affirmed by High court -SLP of assessee is dismissed. [S.80IAC, Art, 136]

S. 268A : Appeal -Instructions – Monetary Limits- Audit objection was not on the issue in the appeal – Appeal was dismissed in Limine. [S. 143(3) 260A, 263]

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue – Commissioner holding view different from that of Assessing Officer on a particular issue -Revision is not justified- High Court cannot set aside finding of Appellate Tribunal unless finding is perverse.[S. 260A]

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue -Capital gains -Cost of improvement -Paid to shareholders under Family Settlement – Discharge encumbrances-Cost of improvement -Relinquishment of rights – Assessing Officer accepting claim -Order erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue -Revision is justified- Order of High Court reversed. [S. 45, 48, 55(1)(b)]

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue -Total income -Eligible profit -Export profit -Deduction under Section 80HHC to be computed on eligible profits only after reducing profits on which deduction availed of under Section 80IB of the Act -Revision was affirmed -Special Leave to appeal of the assessee was dismissed. [S.80HHC, 800IA(9), 80IB(13)]