Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


United Spirits Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022)97 ITR 272 (Bang) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Education cess on secondary and higher education cess-Not allowable as deduction. [S. 40(a)(ii)]

United Spirits Ltd v. Dy CIT (2022) 97 ITR 272 (Bang)(Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Expenditure on sponsoring sports-Allowable as revenue expenditure.

M. V. A. Seetharama Raju v Dy. CIT (2022) 97 ITR 714 (Chennai) (Trib)

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Foreign travel-Disallowance of Rs. 2.5 lakh confirmed.

ACIT v. Rohit and Co. (2022)97 ITR 223 (Kol)(Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Redeemable gift vouchers-No evidence doubting genuineness of the expenditure-Disallowance is not justified.

Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022) 97 ITR 516 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Aircraft Lease Rental-Lessor eligible to claim depreciation-Lessee eligible to claim deduction on rental payments of the aircrafts-Accounting standard created distinction between finance lease and operating lease-Not applicable-Allowed in earlier years-Principle of consistency followed.[S. 32, 145]

Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022)97 ITR 516 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Construction of hospital and school auditorium for benefits of employees-expense made wholly for the purpose of business-Allowable as deduction

Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022)97 ITR 516 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Employee’s stock option plan-Option to purchase shares after completion of vesting period at a lesser price than the market value-Ascertainable liability-Allowable as deduction [S. 145]

Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022)97 ITR 516 (Delhi) (Trib)

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Additional levy of coal pursuant to Supreme court direction-Allowable as deduction. [S. 145]

Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022)97 ITR 516 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Travelling expenses-Ad-hoc disallowance is not justified.

Kamla Retail Ltd. v. Addl. CIT(2022) 212 DTR 94 / 216 TTJ 483 / 140 taxmann.com 343 (Chd)(Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Mercantile system of accounting-leas rent paid pertaining to earlier year-Crystallised during financial year-Allowable as deduction.[S. 145]