Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Southern Ispat and Energy Ltd. v. UOI (NO. 1) (2023)459 ITR 324 (Chhattisgarh)(HC) Editorial : Affirmed, Southern Ispat and Energy Ltd. v.UOI (NO. 2) (2023)459 ITR 328 /(2022) 143 taxmann.com 270 (Chhattisgarh)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Sanction-Alternative remedy-Writ petition dismissed. [S. 147, 151,246A, Art. 226]

Shri Shivaji Maharaj Co-Op. Credit Society Ltd. v. ITO (2023)459 ITR 483 (Karn)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Permanent Account Number-Old permanent account number-Matter remanded to Assessing Officer to afford opportunity to assessee to produce necessary documents-Notice and orders set aside. [S. 74, 144, 144B, 147, 148, 156, 271(1)(c), Art. 226]

Kajal S. Jain v. ITO (2023)459 ITR 365 /(2024) 158 taxmann.com 212 (Mad)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Death of assessee-Failure to respond to notices issued on Department’s Website-Legal representative directed to respond notices with supporting documents-Matter remanded to Assessing Officer for passing fresh order on merits. [S. 69,115BBE, 142(1), 147, Art. 226]

Bakhtawar Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 459 ITR 402 / 335 CTR 481/ (2024) 296 Taxman 476 (Bom) (HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Query raised-Issue considered during original assessment proceedings-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 2(22)(a), 50C, 148, Art. 226]

Noshir Darabshaw Talati v. ACIT (2023)459 ITR 742 /150 taxmann.com 16 (Bom)(HC) Editorial : SLP granted, ACIT v. Noshir Darabshaw Talati (2024) 159 taxmann.com 390/ 297 Taxman 390 (SC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Notice must specify facts which had not been disclosed-Notice not valid.[S.143(3), 148, Art. 226]

Shriprakash Ramshringar Pandey v. ITO (2023)459 ITR 461 (Bom)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Capital gains-Not discussed in the assessment order-No failure to disclose material facts-Notice based on assessment records-Reassessment is not valid.[S.45, 148]

Astec Lifesciences Ltd. v. ACIT (2023)459 ITR 595 /155 taxmann.com 284 (Bom)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Change of opinion-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S.35(2AB), 36(1)(vii),37(1),115JB, 147, 148, Art. 226]

ACIT v. Meer Gems (2023)459 ITR 1 /154 taxmann.com 406/ 294 Taxman 606 (SC) Editorial :Refer Meer Gems v. Asst.CIT (2022) 446 ITR 754/287 Taxman 689 (Bom)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Notice not valid-SLP of Revenue is dismissed.[S. 148, Art. 136]

Vodafone Idea Ltd. v. CPC (2023)459 ITR 413 /156 taxmann.com 258 /(2024) 336 CTR 157 (Bom)(HC)(Bom)(HC)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Faceless assessment-Limitation-Draft assessment order-Reference To Objections to Dispute Resolution Panel-Directions From Dispute Resolution Panel-Failure to follow procedure is not merely procedural irregularity but illegality-Final order passed two years after receipt of directions from Dispute Resolution Panel-Assessment order time-barred-Original return of income to be accepted-Direction to refund excess of legitimate tax.- Court directed the Revenue to take strict action against persons responsible for the laxity and lethargy displayed by which caused a huge loss to the exchequer and in turn to the citizens of this country – Copy of the order is forwarded to CBDT, Principal Secretary , Ministry of Finance , Government of India . [S. 144C(1) 144C(2)(b), 144C(5), 144C(10), 144C(13), Art. 226]

PCIT v. Flextronics Technologies (India) Pvt. Ltd. (2023)459 ITR 493/148 taxmann.com 123 (Karn)(HC)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Assessment-Limitation-Directions issued by Dispute Resolution Panel binding on Assessing Officer-Final order to be passed in conformity with directions within one month-Order is barred by limitation.[S. 143(3), 144C (13)]