Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Sacmi Engineering India (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 215 TTJ 1029 (Ahd)(Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Documents and stamp charges on conversion of debentures into equity shares-Capital expenditure-Alternative claim under section 35D is also rejected. [S. 35D]

Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd v. Add.CIT (2022) 218 TTJ 12(UO) (Mum)(Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Excess interest charged by Bank-Not allowable as deduction-Disallowance was restricted to the extent of the amount claimed as deduction during the year.-Corporate guarantee commission allowable as deduction.

Dy. CIT v. GVK Jaipur Expressway (P) Ltd. (2022) 216 TTJ 540 (Jaipur)(Trib)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Provision for expenses on periodic overlay of BOT road-Ascertained liability-Any addition made towards such provision would enhance the taxable profit which is eligible for deduction under S 80IA(4)(i)-A revenue neutral exercise-Allowable as deduction.[S.80IA(4)(i)]

MRF Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 98 ITR 80 (SN)(Chennai) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Provision for warranty expenses-Matter remanded. [S. 145]

Mangalam Arts v. Dy. CIT (2022) 98 ITR 63 (SN)(Jaipur) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Legal expenses-Allowable as revenue expenditure. [S. 269UC]

Kalaignar TV Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 98 ITR 7 (SN)/)/( 2023) 198 ITD 22 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Legal and travelling expenses-Defence of Directors and Shareholders who were accused in case before CBI Special Court-Matter remanded.

ITO v. Quest 2 Travel.Com India Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 98 ITR 90 (SN) (Mum)(Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Discount-Computer generated Bills not containing signature of assessee or customer-Discount cannot be disallowed.

Diwakar Logistics v. ACIT (2022) 98 ITR 24 (SN) (Hyd.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Payment made at check post and police charges-Expenditure in nature of offence or prohibited by law-Disallowance is proper. [S. 37, Expln. 1]

ACIT (OSD) v. Danfoss Industries Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 98 ITR 8 (SN)(Chennai) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Expenditure on systems, applications and products software licence-Revenue expenditure-Sales tax provision-Matter remanded. [S. 145]

Sasamusa Sugar Works Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022)98 ITR 235 (Kol) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Expense towards community and social welfare activities-Expense allowable.