S. 148: Reassessment-Notice-Notice dated 29-3-2019 had been issued on 30-3-2019 and there was an entry in postal register in support-Order passed is valid in law. [S. 144, 147, Art. 226]
S. 148: Reassessment-Notice-Notice dated 29-3-2019 had been issued on 30-3-2019 and there was an entry in postal register in support-Order passed is valid in law. [S. 144, 147, Art. 226]
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Amalgamation-Intimated to the Department-Cash credits-Notice in the name of company which is ceased to exist – Notice is quashed and set aside. [S. 147 Art. 226]
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Notice issued in the name of non-existent entity-Knowledge of amalgamation was made to the department-notice issued was set-aside.[S. 147, Art.226]
S 148: Reassessment-Notice-Jurisdictional issue-Alternative remedy-Writ petition is maintainable. [S. 147, Art. 226]
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Beyond period of limitation of six years-Notice and consequential order was quashed. [S. 147, 149, Art. 226]
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Beyond period of limitation-Notice and consequential order was quashed-SLP of the Revenue is dismissed due to low tax effect-Issue is kept open. [S. 147, 149, Art. 136]
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Reassessment notice issued would remain in operation unless it is specifically withdrawn, quashed or gets time barred-SLP of Revenue is dismissed as the amount of tax in dispute is low. [S. 147.]
S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-corporate social responsibility expenses-Reopening was without application of mind-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 148, Companies Act, 2013, S. 135 Art.226]
S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Interest paid on loans borrowed-Controlling interest-Change of opinion-Allowed as business expenditure-Notice to reopen assessment was merely on basis of change of opinion of Assessing Officer and same was to be set aside. [S. 37(1), 148, Art. 226]
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Sale of shares-Tax Residency Certificate under laws of Mauritius-Capital gains-Nothing in form of information or material had been put on record-Reassessment notice is quashed and set aside-Matter was to be remanded back to AO to confront assessee with relevant material-DTAA-India-Mauritius. [S. 148, Art. 13, Art. 226]