Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Neena Jatin Shah v. ITO [2025] 179 taxmann.com 498 (Bom)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Notice issued to a dead person is null and void-Notices and consequential order were quashed. [S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 159, Art. 226]

V Hotels Ltd. v. DCIT [2025] 177 taxmann.com 507 (Bom) (HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Approved resolution plan under IBC-Reassessment proceedings initiated for AY 2020-21, which did not form part of the approved resolution plan, were to be quashed.[S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, S.31, 238, Art. 226]

Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd. v. ACIT [2025] 177 taxmann.com 467 (Bom) (HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Approval of resolution plan under IBC-The notice issued under Section 148, both dated 30-6-2025, as well as consequential orders/notices, were quashed and set aside. [S.148, 148A(b), 148A(d), The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, S.31, 238, Art. 226]

Bank of India v. ACIT [2025] 170 taxmann.com 422 (Bom)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Broken period interest on purchase of HTM securities-Pendency before the Supreme Court-Reassessment notice and consequential orders were quashed.[S.37(1), 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Hrishikesh v. PCIT [2025] 175 taxmann.com 1062 (Bom) (HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Agricultural land-Land beyond 8 km from municipality-Not a capital asset-Reopening without verification is invalid.[S. 2(14)(iii), 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Akash Jagdish Issrani v. ITO [2025] 172 taxmann.com 535 (Bom) (HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Writ petition-Failure to respond to notice under section 148A-Extraordinary jurisdiction not to be exercised. [S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Thermax Ltd. v. NFAC [2025] 170 taxmann.com 249 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Non-existent entity-Company had amalgamated with assessee-company with effect from 1-4-2005 and the Assessing Officer was duly informed; notice under section 148 issued against amalgamated non-existent entity was without jurisdiction and assessment was non-est. [S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 226]

Erangal Comtrade and Consultancy LLP v. ACIT [2025] 180 taxmann.com 449 (Bom)(HC)

S. 148: Reassessment-Notice-Notice issued in the name of a non-existent company after conversion into an LLP-Notice and reassessment proceedings void ab initio.[S. 68, 147, Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008, S.58(1),Art. 226]

Sarita Venkat Anthati v. ITO [2025] 173 taxmann.com 214 (Bom) (HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Challenge to notice-Petition filed at a belated stage after seven months-Interim relief refused.[S. 143(3), 147, Art. 226]

Srimani Basu v. ITO [2025] 171 taxmann.com 548 (Bom) (HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Service of notice-Change of address not intimated-Notice quashed on peculiar facts.[S. 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]