Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


TPL-HGIEPL Joint Venture v. UOI [2025] 173 taxmann.com 540 (Bom) (HC)

S. 139: Return of income-Invalid return-Non-filing of audit report-Order of CPC-Writ petition-Alternate remedy-Directed to avail the alternate remedy under section 264. [S. 44AB, 139((9),143(1), 264,Art. 226]

Ramesh Bapurao Potdar v. UOI [2025] 173 taxmann.com 227 (Bom) (HC).

S. 132B: Application of seized or requisitioned assets-Seized assets-Police Authorities-Specified Bank Notes-Deposit with RBI-Serial numbers available-Deposit permitted. [S 131, 132; Specified Bank Notes (Cessation of Liabilities) Act, 2017, S. 5(a); Rules, r. 2(a), Art. 226]

Hiralal H. Malu v. DDI (Inv.) [2025] 171 taxmann.com 260 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 132B : Application of seized or requisitioned assets-Release of seized jewellery-Strictures-Department and bank disputing responsibility for missing jewellery-Both authorities directed to investigate and take immediate action.[S. 119, 132, Art. 226]

CIT v. ITAT [2025] 179 taxmann.com 409 (Bom)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue dismissed, CIT v. Vijay Goel (2025) 307 Taxman 445 (SC)

S. 132: Search and seizure-Satisfaction note-Revenue did not have the satisfaction note, which formed the basis for issuance and authorisation of the search warrant under section 132(1)-Order was quashed.[S. 132(1), Art. 226]

H. K. Jewels (P.) Ltd. v. ADI (Inv.) [2025] 172 taxmann.com 616 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 132: Search and seizure-Seizure of gold and jewellery claimed to be stock-in-trade-Plea challenging legality of seizure not raised before authorities-Opportunity granted to seek release. [S. 131(1A), 132(1)(iii),Art. 226]

Protractive in and out Advertising (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT [2025] 173 taxmann.com 104 (Bom) (HC).

S. 127: Power to transfer cases-Agreement between officers of equal rank-Condition precedent-Compliance with statutory requirements-Transfer valid. [S.127(2), Art. 226]

Bharat Education Society v. ITO [2025] 177 taxmann.com 710 (Bom)(HC)

S. 119: Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Condonation of delay in filing revised return-Order refusing to condone the delay was set aside, and the delay in filing the revised return was condoned.[S. 11, 139, Art. 226]

Sau Dwarkabai Tai Karwa Charitable Public Trust v. CIT (E) [2025] 174 taxmann.com 245 / [2026] 488 ITR 333 (Bom)(HC)

S. 119: Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Condonation of delay in filing Form 10-Order passed by Commissioner (E) was set aside, and the delay in filing Form 10 was condoned.[S.11, 12A, Art. 226]

Penang Enterprises (P.) Ltd. v. CBDT [2025] 172 taxmann.com 199 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Condonation of delay-Delay of 496 days in filing Form No. 10CCB-Genuine difficulties faced by CFO and implementation of new ERP system-Delay condoned. [S. 139 (5), Art. 226]

CEC Rani Joint Venture v. CBDT [2025] 170 taxmann.com 497 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Condonation of delay-Refund of TDS-Delay caused by arbitration proceedings and COVID-19-Condonation directed. [S. 119(2(b), 239, Art. 226]