Dismissing the appeal of the revenue the Court held that the Tribunal is justified in holding that free on board value of contract cannot be included in operating cost and Tribunal rightly held that the Transfer Pricing Officer had “artificially enhanced the cost base of the taxpayer and proposed a mark up of the free on board value of the goods sourced by the associated enterprises and as such this approach was not available in the transactional net margin method under rule 10B(1)(e). (AY. 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10)
CIT v. Itochu India Pvt. Ltd. (2019) 414 ITR 521/ 180 DTR 334/ 310 CTR 430/ 266 Taxman 17 (Mag.) (Delhi)(HC)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Net margin method-Free on board value of contract cannot be included in operating cost- No question of law. [S. 92D, R.10B(1)(e)]