City Petroleums v. ACIT (2024) 232 TTJ 133 (UO) (Chd) (Trib)

S. 69 :Unexplained investments-Survey-Unrecorded advances-Cash in hand recorded in the books of account exceed the amount of cash found-Addition is deleted. [S. 133A]

Held that cash in hand as per the assessee’s books of accounts as on the date of survey exceeded Rs. 41 lacs, the alternate contention of the assessee that the source of the advances allegedly given by it was the said cash in hand is acceptable, and, therefore, the impugned addition of Rs. 29,72,645 made by the AO by invoking the deeming provisions of s. 69 is not sustainable. (AY. 2019-20)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*