Assessee company derived income from business of manufacturing of jewellery and trading of gemstones. On the basis of information from investigation Wing a search action was conducted on the assessee and on the basis of material seized income was estimated at 15% of bogus purchases. On appeal the Tribunal reduced the GP from 15 % to 12%. On appeal by the assessee, dismissing the appeal of the assessee the Court held that finding recorded by Tribunal was a finding of fact based on material on record, no substantial question of law arose. (AY. 2007-08)
Clarity Gold (P) Ltd. v. PCIT (2018) 170 DTR 369 / (2019) 102 taxmann.com 421 (Raj.)(HC) Gem Mart India P. Ltd. v. PCIT ( 2018) 170 DTR 369 (Raj.)(HC)
S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-Estimate of GP from 15% to 12% by the Tribunal is held to be justified.