Assessee claimed that AO did not compute capital gains on shares in accordance with provisions of section 48 and sought to produce additional evidence before Commissioner (Appeals)-Commissioner (Appeals) did not admit additional evidence as filed by assessee observing that assessee did not fulfil any of conditions specified in rule 46A. On appeal the Tribunal held that since additional evidence goes to root of dispute, matter was to be restored to Commissioner (Appeals) for deciding appeal afresh after considering additional evidence. (AY. 2012-13)
FR. Sauter AG v. ITO (2024) 204 ITD 559 (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-Additional evidence-Capital gains-Matter remanded to the file of CIT(A) to decide a fresh after considering the additional evidence.[S. 45, 48, R. 46A]
Leave a Reply