The AO has disallowed 10% of the labour charges . Similar disallowances were made in earlier years which were not contested in appeal . Order of the AO is affirmed by CIT(A) and Tribunal. High Court held on facts no substantial question of law . ( Abdul Qayume v. CIT (1990) 184 ITR 404 (All(HC) ,Laxmi Engineering Industries v. ITO [2008] 298 ITR 203 (Raj)(HC), J.K. Woollen Manufacturers v. CIT (1969) 72 ITR 612 (SC) PCIT v. . Chawla Interbild Construction Co. (P) Ltd., [2019] 104 taxmann.com 402 (Bom)(HC) is distinguished .) .( TA No. 29 of 013, dt. 14.02.2020) (AY. 2009-10)
Ivan Singh v. ACIT (2020) 422 ITR 128/ 195 DTR 227/ 272 Taxman 36/ ( 2021 )) 322 CTR 851 (Bom)(HC) www.itatonline.org
S. 143(3) : Assessment –Ad-hoc addition- Labour charges – On facts the High Court affirmed the order of the Tribunal. [ S.260A ]
URGENT
Dear sir
Please forward following caselaws
Ivan Singh v. ACIT (2020) 422 ITR 128/ 195 DTR 227/ 272 Taxman 36 (Bom)(HC)
Thanks