Kamal Enterprises and New Life Hospital. v. DCIT (2024) 206 ITD 90 (Hyd) (Trib.)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Disallowance of claim-Depreciation-Mere disallowance of claim penalty cannot be levied.-Penalty also quashed on the ground of limitation. [S. 22, 24, 32, 275]

Held that merely because assessee preferred a claim which was not acceptable to revenue, assessee could not be visited with penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c), unless and until twin requirements under section 271(1)(c) were satisfied. Penalty also quashed on the ground of limitation. (AY. 2016-17)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*