Tribunal held that issue of specific charge was not raised in original proceedings , accordingly the issue which did not emanate either from CIT(A) in first round of appeal or from order of Tribunal dt. 10.03.2011, same cannot be agitated in miscellaneous application matter in which matter was remanded to record of AO. Scope of miscellaneous application u/s 254(2) was very limited and circumscribed and parties to appeal cannot be allowed to raise any issue in proceedings u/s 254(2) to set up a new case not arising from proceedings completed till then. Accordingly when this issue was neither arisen from order passed by AO or CIT(A) originally nor from order passed by Tribunal , accordingly issue cannot be raised in appeal filed against order passed in remand proceedings. ( AY. 2005 -06)
Meena Bajaj (Smt) v. ITO (2018) 167 DTR 89 / 192 TTJ 952/ 63 ITR 35 (SN) (Jaipur )( Trib)
S.271(1) (c) : Penalty concealment – Specific charge -concealment of particulars of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income –Issue which was not raised in original proceedings cannot be raised in remand proceedings. [ S.254(2) , 271(1)(a), 274 ]