This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 115BBE: Taxation of unexplained income – Amendment enhancing tax rate from 30% to 60% w.e.f. 01.04.2017 cannot be applied retrospectively to income of F.Y. 2016-17 – Law applicable on the first day of the assessment year governs assessment – Enhanced tax and consequential penalty provisions are prospective- Demonetisation- Cash deposited in Bank -Charge of tax- The enhanced rate of tax @60% came into force on 01.04.2017 and can apply only from that date, i.e. for financial year 2017-18 onwards. [S.4, 68, 69 to 69D, 271AAC, Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Act, 2016, Art. 226)]
Deepak Maratha v. UOI (Raj.)(HC) [2026:RJ-JD:26319-DB]. www.itatonline.org .
S.254(1): Appellate Tribunal – Powers – Condonation of Delay – Co-operative society – Appeal filed after 13 years – Delay caused due to bona fide belief that rectification would be carried out by the Department, change in managing committee, dependence on accountant and Covid-related disruptions – Delay condoned and matter restored for adjudication on merits.[ S. 80P(2)(d), 143(1), 249(3)]
Bakhtawar Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. v. ITO ( Mum) Trib) www.itatonline.org .
S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Limited scrutiny-Commissioner presumed that the Limited scrutiny case was converted into full scrutiny-Unsecured loan-Revision order was quashed.[S. 68]
Sanjeev Garg. v. Pr. CIT (2025) 213 ITD 199 (Chd) (Trib.)
S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Application of income-Donation to another charitable trust-Revision order affirmed. [S. 11, 12A]
Save A Family Plan (India) Aiswaryagram v. DCIT (E) (2025) 213 ITD 27 (Cochin) (Trib.)
S. 254(2): Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Penalty-Concealment-Without valid approval of Joint Commissioner-Miscellaneous application of revenue was dismissed. [S.271(1)(c)]
ACIT v. Vaibhav Pankaj Shah. (2025) 213 ITD 625 (Mum) (Trib.)
S. 254(2): Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Tribunal held that amended provisions of section 115BBE are prospective in nature and not applicable for assessment year 2017-18-Miscellaneous application filed by revenue for rectification of said order of Tribunal was dismissed. [S. 68 to 69D, 115 BBE]
DCIT v. Sanjaybhai Mansukhbhai Patel. (2025) 213 ITD 470 (Surat) (Trib.)
S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Settled under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, read with sections 91 and 92 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024-Declaration and particulars to be furnished-Pending appeal of assessee filed before Tribunal was allowed to be withdrawn. [Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 read with sections 91 and 92 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024, S.91, 92]
LM Wind Power Blades (India) (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 213 ITD 408 (Bang) (Trib)
S. 254(1): Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Credit for tax deducted at source-Additional evidence admitted and matter remanded to the file of CIT(A) to decide in accordance with law. [S. 199]
Anil Vasantrao Deshpande. v.NFAC(2025) 213 ITD 450 (Panaji) (Trib.)
S. 254(1): Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Delay of 464 days-Affidavit-Delay was condoned-CIT(A)-Ex-parte order-Not dealing on merits-Matter remanded to the file of CIT(A) to decide on merits.[S.250(6)]
Ananda Kondu Akhade v. ITO (2025) 213 ITD 260 (Pune)(Trib.)