This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 4: Charge of income-tax-Capital or revenue-Grants-Capital reserve account-Road project-Infrastructure development-Grants/contributions from State Government for completion of road projects undertaken by it on BOT basis-Grants/contributions were a capital contribution by State Government towards the cost of projects-Not taxable as revenue receipts. [S. 28(i), 145]
Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 215 ITD 532 (Mum) (Trib.)
S. 2(22)(e): Deemed dividend-Refundable rental security deposit from tenant-Cannot be assessed as deemed dividend-Matter remanded.
Asha Burman. v. ACIT (2025) 215 ITD 612 (Delhi) (Trib.)
S. 2(22)(e): Deemed dividend-Deemed dividend-Loan to firm where partners held substantial interest in lender company-Assessee not a shareholder-Advances are not chargeable as deemed dividend.
ACIT v. Windlass Steel Crafts LLP (2025) 172 taxmann.com 350/234 TTJ 482 (Delhi)(Trib)
S. 2(14)(iii): Capital gains-Land beyond 8 km from municipal limits-Held, not a capital asset-Agricultural income supported by records-Additions deleted. [S. 10(1), 153A]
Vinaya Sharma v. ACIT (2025) 234 TTJ 417 (Jaipur)(Trib)
S. 272A: Penalty-Failure to answer questions-Sign statements-Furnish information-Defaulted in timely furnishing of information but ultimately submitted all requisite details which were duly considered in framing assessment-lapse was only a technical/venial breach-Penalty was not justified.[S. 10(23C), 139, 272A(1)(d)]
Bundelkhand University. v. DCIT (E) (2025) 214 ITD 688 (Agra) (Trib.)
S.271D: Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Limitation-Penalty proceedings under section 271D were initiated during reassessment by issuing a show-cause notice on 17-8-2022-Penalty order was passed on 29-3-2023 beyond the limitation period under section 275(1)(c)-Penalty was barred by limitation and was not sustainable. [S. 148, 269SS, 275(1)(c)]
Karia Builders. v. ITO (2025) 214 ITD 161 (Pune) (Trib.)
S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Additional evidence obtained under RTI Act-Matter remanded.[S.80IB(10)
Vijay Tukaram Raundal. v. DCIT (2025) 214 ITD 661 (Pune) (Trib.)
S. 270A:Penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income-
Not specifying the charge, whether it was for under-reporting or misreporting of income-Penalty order was void ab initio and not sustainable in law-Penalty was deleted. [S. 45, 54F, 274]
Snehalkumar Bhogilal Trivedi. v.NFAC(2025) 214 ITD 426 (Ahd) (Trib.)
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Donations-CSR activities-Allowed deduction under section 80G-Revision order was set aside. [S.80G, 143(3)]
Jashan Jewels (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT (2025) 214 ITD 112 (Mum) (Trib.)
S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Depreciation-Road Project-Building, operating and transferring a section of national highway-Road construction project-Intangible asset-Eligible depreciation-Mercantile system of accounting-Negative grant-Depreciation on negative grant which was to be paid to NHAI-Depreciation allowable-Revision order set aside.[S. 32 143(3),145]
IRCON Soma Tollway (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT (2025) 214 ITD 139 (Delhi) (Trib.)