This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 4: Charge of income-tax-Income-Sales tax incentive/remission received under a State incentive scheme constituted a capital receipt not chargeable to tax. [S. 2(24)]

Graphite India Ltd. v. CIT (2026) 310 Taxman 543 (Cal)(HC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Arbitral award-Deduction of tax at source-Amount deposited pursuant to interim order of Karnataka High Court-Right to receive had not crystallised and would be taxable only when dispute was finally resolved in assessee’s favour-Order of Tribunal set aside. [S. 145, 260A]

G.H.Reddy & Associates (Construction) (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2026) 310 Taxman 182 (Tel)(HC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Sales tax subsidy-Capital Investment Incentive Policy-Capital receipt-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S.28(i), 260A]

PCIT v. Vardhaman Acrylic Ltd. (2026) 310 Taxman 61 (P&H)(HC)

S. 2(14)(iii) : Capital asset-Agricultural land-Classification of land is the exclusive prerogative of State under the Constitution of India, a Central Act cannot transgress into the domain of the State by providing a different definition of ‘agricultural land’ for the purpose of collecting income tax-Land was treated as agricultural land-Not liable to capital gains tax. [S. 45, 254(1)]

Pallava Resorts (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2026) 310 Taxman 554 (Mad)(HC)

S. 197: Deduction at source – Certificate for lower rate – Foreign company –Non -Resident – No permanent establishment – Assessing Officer was directed to issue certificate for nil withholding tax. [S. 6(3),195, Rule 28AA, Art. 226 ]

SFDC Ireland Ltd v.CIT ( 2026) 486 ITR 353 ( Delhi)( HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment – Notice under section 148A(1) issued within the limitation, but material information was not furnished along with the notice – Subsequent supply of information after expiry of limitation – Invalid notice – Right issue of shares – Difference between the subscription price and the fair market value of the shares. Reassessment notice and consequential orders are quashed. [S. 56(2)(x), 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 149, Art. 226 ]

Grasim Industries Limited v. Dy.CIT (Bom)( HC ) [www.itatonline.org].

S. 56: Income from other sources -Rights shares allotted proportionately to existing shareholders – Difference between subscription price and fair market value cannot, by itself, be treated as income from receipt of property for inadequate consideration – Reassessment notice was quashed on merits as well as on legal grounds. [ S.56(2)(x) , 147, 148 , 148A(b) , 148A(d) , Art. 226 ]

Grasim Industries Limited v. Dy.CIT (Bom)( HC) www.itatonline.org

S. 115BAC: Tax on income of individuals and Hindu undivided family – New tax regime – Option to opt out – Filing of Form No. 10-IEA opting for old tax regime – Contrary declaration in return of income – Prescribed form prevails – Deduction under old tax regime – Matter remanded [S. 143(1), 154, Chapter VI-A]

Aniruddha Mohan Joshi v. ITO (Mum)( Trib) [www.itatonline.org].

S. 153D: Assessment – Search and seizure – Prior approval of Joint Commissioner – Consolidated approval for multiple assessment years – Requirement of independent application of mind for each assessment year – Invalid approval – Assessments quashed – Order of Tribunal affirmed.[S. 153A, 153B, 143(3), 260A]

PCIT v. Atul Kumar Bansal (Delhi (HC) [www.itatonline.org

S. 144BA: Reference to Principal Commissioner or Commissioner in certain cases – General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) – Purchase and sale of bonus shares – Short-term capital loss – Set-off against long-term capital gains arising from slump sale – Transactions through a recognised stock exchange are not an impermissible avoidance arrangement – [S. 50B, 55, 70(2), 96(1)(b), 96(1)(d), 102(1), Chapter X-A, Art.226 ]

EKGE Retail LLP v. ACIT (Telangana (HC) ) [www.itatonline.org].