This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 9(1)(vii) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Fees for technical services-Non-resident-Composite contract-Supply of drawings and designs-Inextricably linked with offshore supply of plant and equipment-Not Fees for Technical Services-Supervisory services-Permanent Establishment-Receipts connected with supervisory PE-Taxable as business profits on net basis-Matter remanded–Supervisory services-Technical services-Supervisory fee taxable as Fees for Technical Services notwithstanding existence of Permanent Establishment-Reimbursement of expenses-Cost contribution arrangement without mark-up-No profit element-Not Fees for Technical Services-DTAA-India-Austria [S.9(1)(i), 195, Art.5, 7(4), 12]
Andritz AG v. Dy. CIT (IT) [2024] 165 taxmann.com 76 / (2025) 122 ITR 479 (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 9(1)(vii): Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Fees for technical services-Non-resident-India-Singapore DTAA-Management services-“Make available” test not satisfied-Receipts not taxable as Fees for Technical Services-Sale of software licences – Licence agreement transferring only right to use software-No services rendered-Receipts not taxable as Fees for Technical Services. DTAA [-India-Singapore [Art. 12(4)(b)]
Tagit Pte. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2024] 159 taxmann.com 93 / (2025) 122 ITR 717 (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Capital receipt-Market Linked focus Product Scheme-Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS)-Reward under Foreign Trade Policy-Not a subsidy, grant or cash incentive-Sale proceeds of MEIS scrips not taxable.[S. 2(24)(xviii), 28(iiib), 56]
Asst. CIT v. Eastman Exports Global Clothing (P.) Ltd. [2024] 167 taxmann.com 434 / (2025) 122 ITR 243 (Chennai)(Trib.)
S. 271(1)(c): Penalty-Concealment-Furnishing inaccurate particulars-Defective notice-Mere disallowance of claim not sufficient-Penalty deleted.[S. 147, 148, 274]
Pradeep Garg v. ITO (2025) 126 ITR 91 / 175 taxmann.com 44 (Jaipur)(Trib.)
S. 270A: Penalty-Under-reporting or misreporting of income-Notice not specifying exact charge-Penalty invalid-Employees’ contribution to Provident Fund and ESI-Issue debatable at relevant time-Penalty not leviable-Ad hoc disallowance of expenditure-Estimated addition-Penalty not leviable.[S.270A(2)(a), 270A(9)]
Mideast Integrated Steels Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2025) 126 ITR 653 (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Weighted deduction for scientific research-Assessee furnished all requisite particulars-Revision not justified.
[S. 35(2AB), 143(3), R. 6]
Genus Power Infrastructures Ltd. v. Pr. CIT (2025) 126 ITR 397 (Lucknow)(Trib.)
S. 254 (1): Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Delay of 1,566 days-Wrong legal advice-Delay condoned.[S. 253]
Ajay Parasmal Kothari v. ITO [2024] 159 taxmann.com 570 / (2025) 126 ITR 511 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 154: Rectification of mistake-Mistake apparent from the record-Employees’ contribution to Provident Fund and ESI-Deposit beyond due date under respective Acts-Disallowance upheld.
[S.36(1)(va) 43B, 139(1), 154]
Zephyrsun Electro Mech (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 126 ITR 493 (Jodhpur)(Trib.)
S. 153D: Assessment-Search-Approval-Mechanical and omnibus approval for seven assessment years-Assessment quashed.[S.153A]
Inder Chand Bajaj v. Dy. CIT (2025) 126 ITR 500 (Delhi)(Trib.)