This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Notice to dead person-Notice under section 148A issued to a deceased assessee is a nullity and vitiates entire proceedings. [S. 119,148, 148A(b) 148A(d), Art. 226]]
Geeta v. PCIT [2024] 166 taxmann.com 369 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Capital gains –Penny stock-Report passed by SEBI with respect to investigation of penny stock being allotted on preferential allotment basis by company-Kamalakshi Finance Corporation Ltd. (“KFCL”).-Notional gain on appreciation of share value, without any transfer, cannot form basis for reopening assessment. [S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art.226]
Aditya Vijay Mirchandani v. ITO [2024] 164 taxmann.com 161 (Bom.) (HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Application of mind-An order passed under section 148A(d) without considering the assessee’s reply and by raising new allegations for the first time in the order itself is invalid due to non‑application of mind and is liable to be set aside. [S. 148,148A(b) 148A(d), 151, Art. 226]
Classic Stripes (P.) Ltd v. DCIT (2024) 162 taxmann.com 467 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Opportunity of hearing-Order under section 148A(d)-Must be a speaking order-Failure to deal with assessee’s submissions renders order invalid. [S. 45, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
Middle Income Group Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. ITO [2024] 161 taxmann.com 455 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Unsigned notice –Failure to file return-Writ petition held not maintainable for failure to follow procedure laid down in GKN Driveshafts case-Directed to file the return of income along with all objections, including the validity of the notice, before the Assessing Officer for disposal via a speaking order. [S. 139, Art. 226]
ZF Steering Gear (India) Ltd v. ACIT [2024] 167 taxmann.com 663 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 148: Reassessment-Notice to non-existent entity-Amalgamation-Notice issued to an amalgamating company is invalid where the basis for reopening collapses. [S. 2(1B),147 292B, Art. 226]
Vertiv Energy (P.) Ltd v. ACIT (2024) 160 taxmann.com 696 (Bom.) (HC)
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Amalgamation-Non existing company-Notice to non-existent amalgamating company is fundamentally invalid-Error is not a mere procedural or clerical mistake that can be rectified under section 292B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. [S. 147, 292B, Art. 226]
PMP Auto Components (P.) Ltd v. DCIT [2024] 159 taxmann.com 307 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 147: Reassessment-Within four years-Reason to believe-Intimation under S. 143(1)-Reopening notice based on a system-generated alert from the Non-Filer Management System (NMS) without independent application of mind is invalid. [S. 68,139, 143(1), 148, Art. 226]
Modern Living Solutions (P.) Ltd. v. ITO [2024] 164 taxmann.com 763 (Bom)(HC)
S. 147: Reassessment-Change of opinion-Enquiry during original assessment-Where Assessing Officer has raised a specific query during original assessment proceedings to which the assessee has replied, the issue is deemed to have been examined-Reopening assessment on the very same issue, even if not discussed in the assessment order, constitutes an impermissible change of opinion. [S. 37(1), 142(1), 148, Art. 226]
PIEM Hotels Ltd. v. ACIT [2024] 162 taxmann.com 703 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-Within four years-Change of opinion-Prior period expenditure-Order of tribunal quashing the reassessment is affirmed. [S. 37(1), 260A]
PCIT v. HDFC Bank Ltd. [2024] 162 taxmann.com 390 (Bom.)(HC)