This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 40(a)(ii) : Amounts not deductible-Rates or tax-Business expenditure-Education cess-Not allowable as deduction.[S. 37(1)]

Yokogawa India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 122 ITR 499 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Bogus purchases-Statement of supplier retracted-Sales accepted-Purchases cannot be treated as bogus-Addition deleted.[S.69C]

Asst. CIT v. Krishnaavtar J. Kabra (HUF) (2025) 122 ITR 337 / 170 taxmann.com 502 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Corporate Social Responsibility expenditure-Explanation 2 prospective-Expenditure incurred prior to assessment year 2015-16 allowable. [Expln. 2 to S. 37(1)]

Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages (P.) Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2025) 122 ITR 290 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Inventory loss and leakage-Consistent view in earlier years-Deduction allowable.

Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages (P.) Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2025) 122 ITR 290 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Construction of building on leasehold land-No ownership of capital asset-Expenditure allowable as revenue expenditure-Delay of 59 days and 206 days was condoned. [S. 32(1), 254(1)]

Asst. CIT v. Eastman Exports Global Clothing (P.) Ltd. [2024] 167 taxmann.com 434 / (2025) 122 ITR 243 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Penalty for violation of law-Seizure of truck with wrong waybill-Not allowable.[Expln. 1 to S. 37(1), GST, VAT]

Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages (P.) Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2025) 122 ITR 290 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(va): Any sum received from employees-Employees’ contribution to Provident Fund and ESI-Delayed payment-Disallowance upheld.[S.43B]

Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages (P.) Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2025) 122 ITR 290 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S.14A: Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Rule 8D not applicable in absence of requisite data-Disallowance restricted to 10 per cent. of dividend income. [R. 8D]

Yokogawa India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 122 ITR 499 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 9(1)(vii) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Fees for technical services-Non-resident-Composite contract-Supply of drawings and designs-Inextricably linked with offshore supply of plant and equipment-Not Fees for Technical Services-Supervisory services-Permanent Establishment-Receipts connected with supervisory PE-Taxable as business profits on net basis-Matter remanded–Supervisory services-Technical services-Supervisory fee taxable as Fees for Technical Services notwithstanding existence of Permanent Establishment-Reimbursement of expenses-Cost contribution arrangement without mark-up-No profit element-Not Fees for Technical Services-DTAA-India-Austria [S.9(1)(i), 195, Art.5, 7(4), 12]

Andritz AG v. Dy. CIT (IT) [2024] 165 taxmann.com 76 / (2025) 122 ITR 479 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 9(1)(vii): Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Fees for technical services-Non-resident-India-Singapore DTAA-Management services-“Make available” test not satisfied-Receipts not taxable as Fees for Technical Services-Sale of software licences – Licence agreement transferring only right to use software-No services rendered-Receipts not taxable as Fees for Technical Services. DTAA [-India-Singapore [Art. 12(4)(b)]

Tagit Pte. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2024] 159 taxmann.com 93 / (2025) 122 ITR 717 (Delhi)(Trib.)