This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 147 : Reassessment-Accommodation entry-Cash credits-Same material-Second notice-No fresh material-Reassessment notice and order disposing of the objection was quashed. [S. 68, 143(3), 148, Art. 226]

PMC Fincorp Ltd. v. ACIT [2024] 158 taxmann.com 533 / (2025) 482 ITR 444 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147: Reassessment-Order passed without considering objections of assessee-Not valid-Order and notice quashed and set aside. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Browntape Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 482 ITR 789 (Bom) (Gao)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Reasons for notice not given to assessee-GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. ITO(2003) 259 ITR 19 (SC)-Draft Order of assessment order passed without giving assessee sufficient time to raise objection; assessment not valid.[S. 148, Art. 226]

Rajesh Poddar v.ITO [2023] 152 taxmann.com 98 / (2025) 482 ITR 770 (Bom)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment–Return filed in response to notice of reassessment. Inadvertent error in stating that the return was under Error should be ignored-Reassessment order passed without considering the submission-Order and consequential notices were quashed and set aside.[S. 139, 148, 292B, Art.226]

Shahana Nayak v. ITO [2023] 151 taxmann.com 482 / (2025) 482 ITR 767 (Bom)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Bad debts-Change of opinion-No new facts-Notice and order disposing of the objection is quashed. [S. 36(1)(vii), 148, Art.226]

Axis Bank Ltd. v.ACIT [2023] 149 taxmann.com 395 / (2025) 482 ITR 746 (Guj)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice is held to be valid.[S. 148, Art. 226]

BDR Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd v. ACIT [2024] 162 taxmann.com 64 /(2025) 482 ITR 477 (Delhi)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Second round of notice-Change of opinion-No failure to disclose material facts-Notice and order disposing of the objection are quashed. [S. 148, Art. 226]

S.B. Packagings Ltd v. ACIT (2025) 482 ITR 456 (Delhi)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Stamp value-Information regarding enhanced stamp value of property purchased by assessee, was before the Assessing Officer at the time of making assessment-Reopening of assessment to assess amount enhanced beyond was not justified.[S. 56, 148, Art. 226]

Chinnathambi Rajeswari v.ACIT (2025) 482 ITR 606 (Mad)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Non application of mind-Change of opinion-Notice and order rejecting objections quashed and set aside [S. 68,143(3), 148,Art. 226]

Hemanshu Ramniklal Shah v ITO (2025) 482 ITR 138/171 taxmann.com 19 (Guj)(HC) Editorial : SLP dismissed, ITO v. Hemanshu Ramniklal Shah (2025) 304 Taxman 610 / 482 ITR 147 (SC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Change of opinion-Failure to disclose material facts-Notice not valid.[S. 148, Art. 226]

Kapstone Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT [2023] 153 taxmann.com 305 / (2025) 482 ITR 940 (Bom)(HC)