This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 199: Deduction at source-Credit for tax deducted-Return held non est-Assessment-Assessing Officer bound to grant credit of taxes and consequential refund.[S.139(9),143(3), 237]

Star India Pvt. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2025) 129 ITR 94 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 195: Deduction at source-Non-resident-Other sums-Fees for Included Services-Pre-clinical laboratory services-No “make available” of technical knowledge-Receipts not taxable in India-No obligation to deduct tax at source-DTAA-India-USA.[S.9(1)(vii), 90(2) Art. 12]

Charles River Laboratories Inc. v. Asst. CIT [2023] 152 taxmann.com 568 / (2025) 129 ITR 754 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 194C: Deduction of tax at source-Contractors-Common Area Maintenance (CAM) charges-Charges paid to independent service providers-Not part of rent-Tax deductible under section 194C at 2 per cent and not under section 194-I. [S. 194-I, 201(1), 201(1A)]

Chadha Sugars and Industries P. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2025) 129 ITR 535 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 153A: Assessment-Search and seizure-No incriminating material-Difference between physical stock and book stock by itself cannot constitute incriminating material-Addition based only on sworn statement without corroborative evidence-Assessment quashed-Delay of three days was condoned.[S. 37, 132, 143(3), 253]

Dy. CIT v. WD and Sons P. Ltd. (2025) 129 ITR 278 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 147: Reassessment-Educational institution-Fresh claim for exemption under section 10(23C) cannot be raised in reassessment proceedings-Order of CIT(A) was restored to decide on merits. [S 10(23C), 139(4C), 143(3), 148, 250]

Dy. CIT v. Navodaya Education Trust (2025) 129 ITR 109 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 144C: Dispute Resolution Panel-Fresh claim-Valid claim raised for first time before Panel-Maintainable-Matter remanded for adjudication on merits.[S. 254(1)]

Edenred SE (formerly known as Edenred SA) v. Dy. CIT [2023] 153 taxmann.com 161 / (2025) 129 ITR 603 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 144C: Reference to dispute resolution panel-Directions issued without Document Identification Number (DIN)-CBDT Circular No. 19/2019 violated-Order null and void. [S. 92CA]

Practo Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 129 ITR 229 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Return filed in name of the amalgamating company after amalgamation-Return non est-Assessment in the name of a non-existent entity also invalid. [S. 139(9)]

Star India Pvt. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2025) 129 ITR 94 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Income-Alleged suppression of purchases-Comparison of eleven months’ purchases with twelve months’ purchases-Wrong methodology-Addition deleted.[S.5]

Dy. CIT v. WD and Sons P. Ltd. (2025) 129 ITR 278 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S.143 (3): Assessment-Revised claim during assessment proceedings-Re-computation of deduction-Fresh revised return not necessary-Tribunal can entertain claim.[S. 10AA, 139, 254(1)]

Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2023] 154 taxmann.com 372 / (2025) 129 ITR 667 (Mum.)(Trib.)