This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 115JB: Company-Book Profit-Sick Industrial Company-Exemption under Explanation 1(vii)-Net worth becoming positive-BIFR Scheme-The BIFR directions merely required the Department to consider continuation of the exemption and did not override the statutory provisions of section 115JB-Exemption not available. [Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985,(SICA), S. 32]
Supertex Industries Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 887 / 179 taxmann.com 677 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 115BAA: Tax on income of certain domestic companies-Determination of tax in certain cases-Concessional tax regime-Revised return-Option under section 115BAA can validly be exercised through a revised return filed within the due date. [S. 139(5)]
ACIT v. Lahari Holiday Homes (P.) Ltd. (2025) 238 TTJ 708 / 179 taxmann.com 217 (Hyd.)(Trib.)
S. 92C: Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-No TP adjustment where consistent benchmarking was accepted in an earlier year. [S.92CA]
SP Armada Oil Exploration (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 209 / 179 taxmann.com 196 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 80G: Donation-Composite charitable and religious trust-Approval cannot be denied if religious expenditure does not exceed 5%.-Matter was remanded. [S. 80G(5), 80G(5B)]
Shree Sthanak Vasi Jain Sanghji Vrajpark v. CIT (E) (2025) 238 TTJ 327 (Ahd.)(Trib.).
S. 69C: Unexplained expenditure-Recorded expenditure cannot be taxed under section 69C [S. 143(3)]
Sree Vishwabharathi Charitable Trust v. ITO (2025) 238 TTJ 828 / 178 taxmann.com 544 (Bang.)(Trib.)
S. 69C: Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-Unverifiable Purchases-Only the profit element embedded in unverifiable purchases can be taxed and not the entire purchase amount-Estimation of 5% GP upheld. [S. 145(3)]
DCIT v. Tirupati Matsup (P.) Ltd. (2025) 238 TTJ 465 / 125 ITR 715 / 177 taxmann.com 836 (Delhi)(Trib.).
S. 69C: Unexplained expenditure-bogus purchases-Addition unsustainable where purchases, movement of goods and consumption are fully evidenced. [S. 145]
Rosha Alloys (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 357 / 127 ITR 76 / 175 taxmann.com 622 (Chd.)(Trib.)
S. 69A: Unexplained money-Search & seizure-Addition based solely on employee’s diary and retracted statements-Not sustainable. (S. 132, 132(4A) 153A)
Estate Investment Company (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 585 (Mum)(Trib).
S. 69A: Unexplained money-Seized Papers-Where seized rough sheets substantially tally with the regular books of account, only unexplained differences can be sustained and not the entire addition. [S.132, 145(3)]
Jamna Dass Nikkamal Jain Saraf (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 473 (Chd.)(Trib.).
S. 69A: Unexplained money-Cash deposits during demonetisation-Addition was deleted where source stood explained from regular books [S. 115BBE]
DCIT v. Santosh Trust (2025) 238 TTJ 237 / 178 taxmann.com 31 (Delhi)(Trib.)