This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Capital gains-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed by High Court-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 48,143(3) 148, Art. 136]
ITO v. Jagdish Kumar Vitthalbhai Patel (2024) 300 Taxman 96 (SC) Editorial: SLP of Revenue is dismissed, Jagdish Kumar Vitthalbhai Patel v. ITO (2023) 151 taxmann.com 121 (Guj)(HC)
S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Development agreement-Capital gain tax-Granted a licence to developer-Issue was consideration before the Assessing Officer-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed by High Court-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 2(47)(v), 45, 148, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, S.53A, Art. 136]
Dy. CIT v. Darshana Anand Damle (2024) 300 Taxman 108 (SC) Editorial : Darshana Anand Damle v.Dy.CIT (2023) 295 Taxman 240/ 459 ITR 60(Bom)(HC)
S. 144C: Reference to dispute resolution panel-Draft assessment order-Passing of final order-Contrary to law-Mistake could not be cured-Delay of 424 days-SLP of Revenue is dismissed as the delay is not explained properly. [S. 156, 292B, Art. 136]
CIT(IT) v. Cisco Systems Services B.V. India Branch(2024) 300 Taxman 359 (SC) Editorial : CIT(IT) v. Cisco Systems Services B.V.(2023) 293 Taxman 85/ 456 ITR 50/334 CTR 52 (Karn)(HC)
S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Personal hearing-Mere creation of video conferencing meeting ID/Link does not absolve Faceless Assessment Unit from discharging its responsibility of offering personal hearing and meeting ID/Link is required to be disclosed/shared, for assessee to log in to said ID/Link, for ensuring compliance of statutory provision of personal hearing as provided for in section 144B(6)(viii)-Assessment order is set aside and matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer. [S. 144B(6)(viii), Art. 226]
Phari Projects (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2024) 300 Taxman 268 (Cal.)(HC)
S. 144 : Best judgment assessment-Shift of business premises-Notices were served on old address-Matter remanded to the file of the Assessing Officer, who shall pass final assessment orders on merits after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing.[S. 143(3), Art. 226]
Senthil Trading and Co. v. Assessing Officer (2024) 300 Taxman 511 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 143 (3): Assessment-Cash credits-Principle of natural justice-Personal hearing is not granted though video conference-In view of Circular dated 6-9-2019 where personal hearing was not technically possible through video conference, then personal hearing ought to be conducted in a designated area in Income-tax office-Matter remanded back to Assessing Officer to give opportunity of hearing to assessee.[S. 68, 263, Art. 226]
Fusion Granito (P.) Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2024) 300 Taxman 1 (Guj.)(HC)
S. 143 (3): Assessment-Merger-Assessment order in the name of transferor company is quashed and set aside. [S. 148, Art. 226]
SPB Papers Ltd. v. ITO, NFAC (2024) 300 Taxman 554 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 132(3) : Search and seizure-Prohibitory order-Article-Liquor-Contention of Revenue that liquor cannot be included in the expression of valuable article is rejected-Order issued under section 132(3) is quashed on the ground that Revenue could have invoked section 132(1) of the Act-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 132, Art. 136]
ITD v. Dilip Mehta (2024) 300 Taxman 584 (SC) Editorial: SLP of Revenue is dismissed, Dilip Mehta v. ITD (2024)) 337 CTR 342/ 300 Taxman 584 (MP)(HC)
S. 127 : Power to transfer cases-Search-From ITO Delhi to DCIT, Karnal Haryana-Incriminating material-Transfer of case on grounds of administrative convenience and meaningful assessment-Writ petition is dismissed. [S. 124,131(IA), 132, Art, 136]
Dollar Gulati v.PCIT(2024) 162 taxmann.com 348 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial : SLP is dismissed, Mark Gulati v. Pr. CIT (2024) 300 Taxman 92 (SC)
S. 127 : Power to transfer cases-Opportunity of hearing-No reasonable opportunity had been provided before transferring case and officer of Bangalore to Delhi-Order of single Judge is affirmed.[S. 124, Art. 226]
Dy.CIT v. Sunil Kumar Sharma (2024) 159 taxmann.com 179 (Karn)(HC) Editorial : CIT (Appeals) v. Sunil Kumar Sharma (2024) 300 Taxman 601 (SC)