This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Bad debts-Change of opinion-No new facts-Notice and order disposing of the objection is quashed. [S. 36(1)(vii), 148, Art.226]

Axis Bank Ltd. v.ACIT [2023] 149 taxmann.com 395 / (2025) 482 ITR 746 (Guj)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice is held to be valid.[S. 148, Art. 226]

BDR Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd v. ACIT [2024] 162 taxmann.com 64 /(2025) 482 ITR 477 (Delhi)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Second round of notice-Change of opinion-No failure to disclose material facts-Notice and order disposing of the objection are quashed. [S. 148, Art. 226]

S.B. Packagings Ltd v. ACIT (2025) 482 ITR 456 (Delhi)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Stamp value-Information regarding enhanced stamp value of property purchased by assessee, was before the Assessing Officer at the time of making assessment-Reopening of assessment to assess amount enhanced beyond was not justified.[S. 56, 148, Art. 226]

Chinnathambi Rajeswari v.ACIT (2025) 482 ITR 606 (Mad)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Non application of mind-Change of opinion-Notice and order rejecting objections quashed and set aside [S. 68,143(3), 148,Art. 226]

Hemanshu Ramniklal Shah v ITO (2025) 482 ITR 138/171 taxmann.com 19 (Guj)(HC) Editorial : SLP dismissed, ITO v. Hemanshu Ramniklal Shah (2025) 304 Taxman 610 / 482 ITR 147 (SC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Change of opinion-Failure to disclose material facts-Notice not valid.[S. 148, Art. 226]

Kapstone Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT [2023] 153 taxmann.com 305 / (2025) 482 ITR 940 (Bom)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Change of opinion-Failure to disclose material facts-Notice not valid.[S. 148, Art. 226]

Welcome Plywood Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO [2023] 153 taxmann.com 285 / (2025) 482 ITR 936 (Bom)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Change of opinion-Reassessment notice and order disposing of the objection are quashed. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Wellgroomed Venture v. ACIT (2025) 482 ITR 813 (Bom)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Scrutiny assessment-No evidence of failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing of objection was quashed. [S. 143(3) 148, Art. 226]

Aashish Niranjan Shah v. UOI [2024] 167 taxmann.com 561 / (2025) 482 ITR 492 (Bom)(HC)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-No rejection of books of account-Deletion of addition by the Tribunal based on three years’ gross profit is affirmed.[S.260A]

PCIT v. Mahabir Jute Mills Ltd [2024] 162 taxmann.com 601 / (2025) 482 ITR 345 (All)(HC)