S. 153 : Assessment-Reassessment-Limitation-Tribunal, by order dated 31-3-2015, remanded matter to Assessing Officer for de novo consideration-Fresh assessment, as directed by Tribunal, ought to have been completed on or before 31-3-2017 as per sub-section (7) of section 153, as amended by the Finance Act, 2016-Notice dated 6-11-2020 issued by Assessing Officer was barred by limitation. [S. 153(6), 153(7), 254(1), Art. 226]

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-A notice which was originally issued under section 148 by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer in terms of old regime and which had been deemed to be issued under section 148A(b) could be continued to be processed by same officer. [S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art.226]

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Limitation-Assessee was given extended time to respond to notice under section 148A(b)-Time was excludable for computing limitation under section 149(1)-Order passed under section 148A(d) was not time-barred. [S. 148A(b), 148A(d), 149(1), Art. 226]

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Alternative remedy-Writ is maintainable.[S. 148A(b), 148A(d),246A(1)(b), Art. 226]

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Limitation-Notices issued for asst. yr. 2015-16 are held to be invalid as same were issued during the extended period from 1st April, 2021 to 30th June, 2021 under TOLA. [S. 148,149(1),TOLA, S. 3(1), Art. 226]

S 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Notice under section 148 was issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO)-Notice was quashed-Reopening notice had been issued after more than three years from end of relevant assessment year and thus, reopening without sanction/approval of specified authority in accordance with section 151 was bad in law-Assessee and CBDT entered into a unilateral Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) and assessee filed a modified return as per agreement, since no adverse report was received from TPO which could lead to cancellation of agreement, Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction to make further ALP adjustments and was bound to accept modified return.[S. 92CD, 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(b) 151, 151A, Art. 226]

S 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Cash credits-Proceedings under sections 148A as also 148 ought to have been issued and proceeded in a faceless manner-Notice issued by jurisdictional Assessing Officer not in a faceless manner was bad in law and was t quashed and set aside. [S.68, 147, 148, 148A(b) 148A(d), 151A, Art. 226]

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Purchase of house in joint name-Cash credits-Entire consideration was paid by the husband-Reassessment notice in the name of wife was quashed and set aside.[S.68, 133(6), 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

S. 148: Reassessment-Notice-Merger-Tribunal quashed the order-No specific direction for reassessment-Section 150 could not be invoked-Notice was time-barred and invalid under section 149.[S. 149, 150]

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Limitation-DRP’s proceedings was issued on 10-6-2022, uploaded in ITBA portal on 22-6-2022 and communicated to Assessing Officer on 4-7-2022, last date for passing impugned assessment order would have expired on 31-8-2022 and, thus, assessment order passed on 19-8-2022 was within period of limitation. [S.144C(13), Art. 226]