S. 133A: Survey-Unexplained investments-No addition can be made solely on the basis of a survey statement without corroborative evidence.[S. 133A]
ACIT v. Ramasubbu Minnalkodi (2025) 238 TTJ 337 (Chennai)(Trib.).S. 133A: Survey-Unexplained investments-No addition can be made solely on the basis of a survey statement without corroborative evidence.[S. 133A]
ACIT v. Ramasubbu Minnalkodi (2025) 238 TTJ 337 (Chennai)(Trib.).S. 132B: Application of seized or requisitioned assets-Search and Seizure-Adjustment of seized cash against self-assessment tax was allowed. [S. 132, 140A]
Kapoor Industries Ltd. v. CPC (2025) 238 TTJ 798 (Delhi)(Trib.)S.115BAC: Tax on income of individuals and Hindu undivided family-New tax regime-Delay in filing Form No. 10-IE-Option cannot be denied.[S. 115BAC(5), 139(2)]
Sanju Soni v. ITO (2025) 238 TTJ 578 (Jodhpur)(Trib).S. 115JB: Company-Book Profit-Sick Industrial Company-Exemption under Explanation 1(vii)-Net worth becoming positive-BIFR Scheme-The BIFR directions merely required the Department to consider continuation of the exemption and did not override the statutory provisions of section 115JB-Exemption not available. [Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985,(SICA), S. 32]
Supertex Industries Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 887 / 179 taxmann.com 677 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 115BAA: Tax on income of certain domestic companies-Determination of tax in certain cases-Concessional tax regime-Revised return-Option under section 115BAA can validly be exercised through a revised return filed within the due date. [S. 139(5)]
ACIT v. Lahari Holiday Homes (P.) Ltd. (2025) 238 TTJ 708 / 179 taxmann.com 217 (Hyd.)(Trib.)S. 92C: Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-No TP adjustment where consistent benchmarking was accepted in an earlier year. [S.92CA]
SP Armada Oil Exploration (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 209 / 179 taxmann.com 196 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 80G: Donation-Composite charitable and religious trust-Approval cannot be denied if religious expenditure does not exceed 5%.-Matter was remanded. [S. 80G(5), 80G(5B)]
Shree Sthanak Vasi Jain Sanghji Vrajpark v. CIT (E) (2025) 238 TTJ 327 (Ahd.)(Trib.).S. 69C: Unexplained expenditure-Recorded expenditure cannot be taxed under section 69C [S. 143(3)]
Sree Vishwabharathi Charitable Trust v. ITO (2025) 238 TTJ 828 / 178 taxmann.com 544 (Bang.)(Trib.)S. 69C: Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-Unverifiable Purchases-Only the profit element embedded in unverifiable purchases can be taxed and not the entire purchase amount-Estimation of 5% GP upheld. [S. 145(3)]
DCIT v. Tirupati Matsup (P.) Ltd. (2025) 238 TTJ 465 / 125 ITR 715 / 177 taxmann.com 836 (Delhi)(Trib.).S. 69C: Unexplained expenditure-bogus purchases-Addition unsustainable where purchases, movement of goods and consumption are fully evidenced. [S. 145]
Rosha Alloys (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 238 TTJ 357 / 127 ITR 76 / 175 taxmann.com 622 (Chd.)(Trib.)