This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 92C: Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Most appropriate method-Royalty-Department adopting comparable uncontrolled price method-Tribunal in assessee’s own case for earlier year holding transactional net margin method most appropriate-Assessee’s use of same method justified-Payment of management fees to associated enterprise-Identical payment accepted by Transfer Pricing Officer in earlier years-Facts similar in current year-Payment held to be at arm’s length.[S.92CA]

Schaeffler India Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2025) 131 ITR 237 (Ahd)(Trib)

S. 92C: Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction Management support services-Fresh evidence filed before Tribunal-Matter remanded for examination by Transfer Pricing Officer.[S.92CA]

Asst. CIT v. Kerry Indev Logistics P. Ltd (2025) 131 ITR 100 (Chennai) (Trib)

S. 92C: Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-While benchmarking specified domestic transactions, the TPO cannot cherry-pick only low-priced products from a basket of products for determining ALP-Where TNMM is accepted as the Most Appropriate Method in the subsequent year, the supplementary TP study adopting TNMM ought to be considered. [S. 92BA]

Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2025) 131 ITR 15(Hyd)(Trib.)

S. 90: Double taxation relief-Foreign Tax Credit-FTC cannot be denied merely because Form No. 67 was filed after the due date under section 139(1), where it was furnished before completion of assessment-Requirement under Rule 128(9) is directory and not mandatory. [S., 91, 143(1), R. 128(9)]

Ashish Sood v. Dy. CIT (2025) 131 ITR 436 (Chd)(Trib.)

S. 80IA: Industrial undertaking-Special deduction-Container freight station approved and notified as infrastructure facility-Deduction allowable.[S.80IA(4)]

Asst. CIT v. Kerry Indev Logistics P. Ltd (2025) 131 ITR 100 (Chennai) (Trib)

S. 69B: Unexplained investment-Survey-Excess stock found during survey of business premises-Surrendered in return as business income-No independent source of investment shown-Business being sole source of income-Survey at business premises, no books impounded, no reasons recorded-Deeming provision not attracted-Excess stock taxable as business income. [S. 28, 115BBE, 133A]

Nikhaar Fashions v. Asst. CIT (2025) 131 ITR 1 (Jaipur)(Trib)

S. 68: Cash credits-Search and seizure-Undisclosed income-Advances received through banking channels for land sale-Suppression means receipt of excess as own money outside banking channel-No correlation with specific sale-Not unaccounted sale-Addition deleted.-Advances from buyers-Addition based on book entries, not incriminating material-Confirmation, ledger, bank statements furnished-Identity/creditworthiness beyond dispute once sale deed registered-Non-filing of confirmation from few persons irrelevant-Addition deleted-Unaccounted sale consideration-Managing partner’s admission vs registered sale deed-Latter to prevail-Only profit element assessable, cost subsumed in closing stock-Commissioner (Appeals)’s findings upheld-Advances not linked to identifiable plot-Confirmation, ledger, PAN furnished-Addition based on book entries not incriminating material-Identical treatment required for similarly placed parties-Addition deleted-Addition based solely on partner’s statement admitting unaccounted income-Statement pertaining to partners, not assessee-No corroborating material-Addition not sustainable. [S. 132, 132(4)]

S. A. Builders and Developers v. Asst. CIT (2025) 131 ITR 685 (Hyd.)(Trib)

S. 68: Cash credits-Share capital and premium-Newly incorporated company, no business model-500-fold premium charged only on second lot issued 27 days after first lot at nil premium-Investors unverifiable, no source of funds, director not produced-Source of funds not established-Identity, creditworthiness and genuineness not substantiated-Addition as unexplained cash credit justified.

Toplink Commerce Ltd v. ITO (2025) 131 ITR 503(Kol) (Trib)

S. 45: Capital gains-Transfer of bundle of rights/obligations as investment to a partner-The compensation received for not initiating assured insurance business is a capital receipt and not chargeable to tax as capital gains.[S.4, 55(2)(a)]

CIT (Asst.) v. U. K. Paints (India) P. Ltd. (2025) 131 ITR 74 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 44B: Shipping business-Non-residents-Computation-Taxability in India-Presumptive tax-Business of operation of ships for international carriage-Goods and services tax collected as statutory levy and shown separately in invoice-Not part of gross receipts-Tribunal, in assessee’s own case for earlier years, consistently holding service tax excludable from gross receipts-GST not includible in computing income under section 44B-Addition deleted-Income offered to tax under section 44B read with section 90(2)-Section 115JB not applicable-Book profit computation deleted-DTAA-India-Hong Kong. [S. 90(2), 115JB(1), Expln. 4A,145A], Art.8]

Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2025) 131 ITR 589(Mum) (Trib)