This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Provision for depreciation on AFS securities-Debited to profit and loss account-Allowable as deduction.

ACIT v. Karad Urban Co. Op. Bank Ltd. (2025) 211 ITD 717 (Pune) (Trib.)

S. 36(1)(viia) :Bad debt-Provision for bad and doubtful debts-Schedule bank-Provisions are made as per direction of RBI-Allowable as deduction.

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 211 ITD 608 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 36(1)(va): Any sum received from employees-Delayed payment of employee’s contribution towards PF and ESIC-Not allowable as deduction. [S. 37(1)]

Diebold Nixdorf India (P.) Ltd. v. CIT (2025) 211 ITD 377 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) :Interest on borrowed capital-Interest on customer advances-Advances received from customers were utilized for business purposes as per MOU-Addition is deleted.

Ujwala Developers (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 211 ITD 738 (Hyd) (Trib.)

S. 35 : Expenditure on scientific research-Capital expenditure-Outside India-Not eligible for weighted deduction under section 35(2AB)-Eligible for deduction under section 35(1)(iv) of the Act.[S. 35(1)(iv), 35(2AB)]

Mahle Behr India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 211 ITD 485 (Pune) (Trib.)

S. 32 : Depreciation-Not claimed-Commercial manner-As per Explanation 5 to section 32(1), depreciation was to be allowed while computing its income in a commercial manner. [S.11, 12, 12A, 32 (1)]

Vidya Kunj School. v. ITO (2025) 211 ITD 11(SMC) (Raipur) (Trib.)

S. 28(i) : Business income-Power generation-Interest income-Loans and advances to employees-interest income earned from loans and advances provided to employees is incidental to business of power generation and qualified as business income and not as income from other sources.[S. 56]

DCIT v. Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Ltd. (2025) 211 ITD 405 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 26 : Income from house property-Co-owners-Association of persons-Maximum marginal rate-Tax rate applicable to individual Co-owners-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer.[S. 22, 167B]

Nam Group Aslali. v. Assessing Officer, CPC (2025) 211 ITD 369 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S.14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-No exempt income during year-No disallowance can be made.[R.8D]

JIL Information Technology Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 211 ITD 277 (Lucknow) (Trib.)

S.14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Merely because the AO did not expressly record his dissatisfaction about assessee’s calculation-The conclusion of the AO cannot be rejected-Only those investments are to be considered for computing disallowance under section 14A which yielded exempt income during year.[R.8D]

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 211 ITD 608 (Mum.) (Trib.)