This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 2(22)(e) : Deemed dividend-Loan to a share holder–Not in the business of lending of money–Holding more than 10 percent voting power – Assessable as deemed dividend.

Rajesh Kumar v. ACIT (2019) 175 ITD 734 / 181 DTR 79 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 2(15) : Charitable purpose–School-Expenditure incurred on catering services for maintenance of its boarding school- Held to be educational purposes –Entitle to exemption. [S. 11, 13, 12AA]

DCIT v. Wood Stock School. (2019) 175 ITD 722 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty – Concealment –Disallowance of expenses –Full details are disclosed – Levy of penalty is held to be not justified.

Granite Gate Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2019) 414 ITR 130/175 DTR 415 / 307 CTR 599 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 245D : Settlement Commission – Power- Settlement Commission does not have power to reduce or waive interest statutorily payable under S. 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Act – Matter remanded to settlement Commission .[ S. 154, 234A, 234B, 234C,245D(4),245D(6), 245F]

Kakadia Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 412 ITR 128 / 175 DTR 305 / 307 CTR 369 / / 262 Taxman 268 (SC) Editorial: Refer, Kakadia Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO ( 2014) 362 ITR 342 ( Guj) (HC)

S.139AA:Quoting of Aadhaar number-From assessment years 2019-20 ,linkage of PAN with Aadhaar card is mandatory .

UOI v. Shreya Sen (2019) 262 Taxman 370 /174 DTR 265/ 306 CTR 609 (SC) Editorial : Shreya Sen v. UOI ( 2018) 257 taxman 95/ 407 ITR 37 (Delhi) (HC), partly reversed .

S.54F : Capital gains- Investment in a residential house – Construction activities of the new house started before the date of sale of original asset – Beneficial provision and should be liberally interpreted- Entitle to exemption . [ S.45 ]

Kapil Kumar Agarwal v. DCIT (Delhi)(Trib),www.itatonline.org

S. 115JB : Book profit – Banking – Insurance – Electricity company- Are not company bound by provisions of Companies Act – (Pre amendment by Finance Act, 2012)-Provision is not applicable to a banking company , insurance & electricity cos- The mechanism provided for computing book profit in terms of S. 115JB(2) is wholly unworkable for a banking company- When the machinery provision fails, the charging section also fails-Provision is not applicable -The anomaly was removed by the Finance Act, 2012-However, the amendments are neither declaratory nor clarificatory but make substantive and significant legislative changes which are applicable prospectively.

CIT v. Union Bank of India ( 2019) 177 DTR 305/ 308 CTR 797/ 263 Taxman 685 (Bom)(HC).www.itatonline.orgEditorial: SLP is granted to the revenue PCIT v. Union Bank of India ( 2019) 418 ITR 9 (St) (SC)/ ( 2020) 269 Taxman 487 (SC)

S. 56 : Income from other sources – Fair Market Value-DCF method –Closely held company – The fact that the company is loss-making does not mean that shares cannot be allotted at premium. The DCF method is a recognised method though it is not an exact science & can never be done with arithmetic precision. The fact that future projections of various factors made by applying hindsight view cannot be matched with actual performance does not mean that the DCF method is not correct. [ S. 56(2)(viib), Rule 11UA. ]

India Today Online Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 176 ITD 459/ 178 DTR 17/ 199 TTJ 681(Delhi)(Trib),www.itatonline.org

S. 50C : Capital gains-Full value of consideration- Stamp valuation- AO is obliged to compute the capital gains by taking the valuation arrived at by the DVO in place of the actual consideration received by the assessee -The assessee is entitled to challenge the correctness of the DVO’s valuation before the CIT(A) and the Tribunal- The DVO has to be given an opportunity of hearing. [ S.45 ]

Lovy Ranka v. DCIT ( 2019) 177 DTR 273/199 TTJ 670(Ahd)(Trib), www.itatonline.org

S. 251 : Appeal – Commissioner (Appeals) – Powers – CIT(A) is not empowered to dismiss appeal for non-prosecution and is obliged to dispose of appeal on merits by passing a speaking order. [S. 250]

Swati Pawa (Ms.) v. DCIT (2019) 175 ITD 622 (Delhi)(Trib.)