This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident–Independent personal services outside India-Not chargeable to tax in India –Not liable to deduct tax at source-DTAA–India–Canada. [S.9(1)(i), Art. 12, 14 ]

DCIT v. Hydrosult Inc. (2019) 175 ITD 525 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure – Corporate social responsibilities- Held to be allowable – Explanation 2 inserted in section 37(1) with effect from 1-4-2015 is prospective in nature. [S. 35AC, 80G, Companies Act, 2013, S. 135]

National Small Industries Corp. Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 175 ITD 601 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income–Stock in trade–Dividend received incidentally–No disallowance can be made. [R. 8D]

Nice Bombay Transport (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (OSD) (2019) 175 ITD 684 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes–kalyanamandapams, school, health centre and library-Donation to Trust–Predominant activity of assessee society is charity- Eligible for exemption. [S. 11(1), 11(4), 12A]

AVM Charities. v. ITO (2019) 175 ITD 654 / 174 DTR 1 / 197 TTJ 513(Chenni)(Trib.)

S. 10(23C) : Educational institution-Skill training programme– Placement activities-Entitle to exemption. [S. 2(15), 10(23C)(iiiab), 12AA]

Process-Cum-Product Development Centre v. ACIT (2019) 175 ITD 517/ 178 DTR 433 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)–Additional evidence-Ex parte order- Duty of the CIT(A) to admit additional evidence in the interest of justice-Matter remanded to AO. [S.10AA, 80IC, 144, R. 46A(4)]

Shree Ganesh Concast Group of Industries v. Dy.CIT (2018) 195 TTJ 1 (UO) (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 143(3) : Assessment—Difference in form 26AS-Matter remanded. [26AS]

Jaipur Pensioners Hitkari Sahakari Samiti Ltd. v. ITO (2018) 195 TTJ 112 (UO) (Jaipur ) (Trib.)

S. 9C : Transfer pricing—Functionally Different-Cannot be considered for comparable.

Dy.CIT v. Philips Electronics India Limited. (2018) 196 TTJ 1031 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-TNMM- Once a comparable was found functionally similar and further authentic and reliable financial data were available relevant to accounting period of assessee then merely comparable had different FY, it could not be excluded- TP adjustment made on outstanding receivable beyond 30 days credit period applying interest rate of 14.88% p.a. and computing interest receivable is held to be justified.

BT E-Serv (India) P. Ltd. v. ITO (2018) 195 TTJ 137 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arms length price-Items like spares, accessories, batteries are used by assessee in discharge its obligation of warranty or replacement of damaged items in transportation then no transfer pricing adjustment required to be made in respect of Purchase of finished goods and spares.

Dy.CIT v. Eaton Power Quality Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 195 TTJ 367 (Pune)(Trib.)