S. 80HHC : Export business-Total turnover-Entire turnover of business – Donation for scientific research cannot be excluded. [S.35(1)(ii), 80GGA]
Sri Aurobindo Ashram Harpagaon Workshop Trust v. DCIT (2019) 415 ITR 247 (Mad.)( HC)S. 80HHC : Export business-Total turnover-Entire turnover of business – Donation for scientific research cannot be excluded. [S.35(1)(ii), 80GGA]
Sri Aurobindo Ashram Harpagaon Workshop Trust v. DCIT (2019) 415 ITR 247 (Mad.)( HC)S. 69B : Amounts of investments not fully disclosed in books of account –Addition is held to be not justified solely on the basis of photocopy of agreement between two other persons which was seized during search of third party. [S. 132, 513A]
CIT v. Kulwinder Singh (2019) 415 ITR 49/ 311 CTR 233 (P&H) (HC)S. 68 : Cash credits-Capital gains-Sale of property-Part of sale consideration credited in assessee’s account–Addition as income from undisclosed source is held to be justified. [S. 45]
CIT v. Harri Joseph (2019) 415 ITR 181 (Ker.)(HC)S. 68 : Cash Credits-Source of fund explained–Burden discharged -Deletion of addition is held to be justified.
CIT v. T. B. Kunhimahin Haji and others. (2019) 415 ITR 491 (Ker.)(HC)S. 55A : Capital gains-Reference to valuation officer-Cost of acquisition-Filing valuation report-Refusal to make reference to valuation officer is not proper-Matter remitted to Assessing Officer for reference to valuation officer. [S. 45]
C. V. Sunny. v. CIT (2019) 415 ITR 127/ 179 DTR 115/ 309 CTR 291/ 265 Taxman 19 (Mag.) (Ker.)(HC)S.28(i) Business income- : Capital Gains-Capital asset-Agricultural land-Purchase lands from land owners, convert them for non-agricultural use and sell them to companies-Property sold was not capital asset- Assessable as business income . [S. 2(14), 45 ]
Sunil Bansal v. ACIT (2019) 415 ITR 236/ 267 Taxman 87 (Raj.)(HC) Editorial: SLP of assessee dismissed , Sunil Bansal v. CIT (2022) 287 Taxman 175/113 CCH 172 (SC)/ Review petition dismissed, Sunil Bansal v. CIT (2022) 288 Taxman 650 (SC)S. 45 : Capital gains-Capital loss-Loss incurred on account of sale of shares to sister concern-Neither fraudulent nor colourable device-Allowable as capital loss. [S. 260A]
CIT v. Parry and Co. Ltd. (2019) 415 ITR 45 (Mad.)(HC)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Year of allowability of expenditure-Method of accounting-Rate of tax is same in both assessment years-Question academic-No question of law. [S. 145, 260A]
PCIT v. Rajesh Prakash Timblo (2019) 415 ITR 334/ (2020) 185 DTR 34/ 313 CTR 91 (Bom.)(HC) PCIT v. Vidya Rajesh Timlo (2019) 415 ITR 334/(2020) 185 DTR 34 / 313 CTR 91 (Bom.)(HC)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Manufacture of yarn-Replacement of old machinery by purchase and installation of new machinery-Not allowable as revenue expenditure.
CIT v. Kongarar Spinners Ltd. (2019) 415 ITR 103 (Mad.)(HC)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure—Commission paid to persons who have referred the students–Disallowance of 50% of commission is held to be justified.
Malti Gupta (Smt.) v. CIT (2019) 415 ITR 168 (P&H)(HC)