This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 54 : Capital gains – Profit on sale of property used for residence- Consideration that arose in hands of HUF on sale of capital asset had been invested for purchase of new residential house in name of some of its members instead of assessee (HUF)-Entitle to exemption. [S. 45]
PCIT v. Vaidya Panalalmanilal (HUF) (2018) 259 Taxman 19 (Guj.)(HC)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure–Business of developing, maintaining and operating of Bus-Q-Shelters (BQS), metro stations, highways etc.–Encashment of bank guarantee–Allowable as business expenditure.
PCIT v. Green Delhi BQS Ltd. (2018) 259 Taxman 153 / 175 DTR 131/ 307 CTR 797/2019) 417 ITR 162 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure–Pendency of constitutional validity of proviso to Rule 9A- Matter remanded to CIT(A) to decide on merits. [R. 9A]
Satish Yashwant Kulkarni v. UOI (2018) 259 Taxman 489 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-loan was used for acquiring or construction of assets that were used for earning taxable income- Interest expenditure is held to be allowable.
PCIT v. International Biotech Park Ltd. (2018) 259 Taxman 14 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 32 : Depreciation–Public roads treated as building and allowed depreciation-Optical fibres used exclusively for computer configuration were part of computer system and thus eligible for higher rate of depreciation.
PCIT v. GVK Jaipur Expressway Ltd. (2018) 100 taxmann.com 95 / 259 Taxman 430 (Raj.)(HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed; PCIT v. GVK Jaipur Expressway Ltd. (2018) 259 Taxman 429 (SC)
S. 28(i) : Business income-Income from house property- Construction of shopping malls-Commercially exploit property by way of complex commercial activities and, it was not a case of letting out property simplicitor-Rental income is assessable as business income. [S. 22]
PCIT v. E City Real Estate (P.) Ltd. (2018) 100 taxman 93 / 259 Taxman 410 (Bom.)(HC) Editorial : SLP is granted to the revenue ;PCIT v. E City Real Estate (P.) Ltd. (2018) 259 Taxman 409 (SC)
S. 28(i) : Business income–Sub lease of property–Assessable as business income and not as income for other sources. [S. 56]
PCIT v. International Biotech Park Ltd. (2018) 259 Taxman 14 (Bom.)(HC)