S. 115BBDA : Dividend received from domestic companies, tax on- Constitutionally valid and not arbitrary – Petition was dismissed. [S.10(34), 115BA, 115-0, Art. 14]
Rajan Bhatia v CBDT (2019) 306 CTR 561 / 261 Taxman 255/ 174 DTR 145 (Delhi)(HC)S. 115BBDA : Dividend received from domestic companies, tax on- Constitutionally valid and not arbitrary – Petition was dismissed. [S.10(34), 115BA, 115-0, Art. 14]
Rajan Bhatia v CBDT (2019) 306 CTR 561 / 261 Taxman 255/ 174 DTR 145 (Delhi)(HC)S. 56 : Income from other sources-Fair market value of shares- Direct Cash Flow (DCF) method-Valuation done by Chartered Accountant is rejected–Failure to prove projection / estimation was done on scientific method-Matter was to be restored to AO who would scrutinize valuation report and, adopt own valuation if not satisfied with explanation of assessee; however, basis of valuation would be DCF method and he could not change method of valuation which was opted by assessee. [S.56(2)(viib), 11UA(b)]
Innoviti Payment Solutions (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 175 ITD 10/ 178 DTR 332/199 TTJ 626 (Bang.)(Trib.)S. 56 : Income from other sources-Compulsory cumulative convertible Preference Shares (CCCPS) at huge premium-Voting right on various resolutions–Matter restored to CIT(A) to consider all terms of issue of preference shares and decide a fresh in terms of rule 11UA. [S. 56(2)(viib), R.11UA(2)(a)]
2M Power Health Management Services (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 175 ITD 64 (Bang.)(Trib.)S. 54F : Capital gains-Investment in a residential house- purchasing land before period of one year prior to sale of another capital asset- Not entitle to exemption. [S. 45]
Parswanath Padmarajaiah Jain. v. ACIT (2019) 175 ITD 55 (Bang.) (Trib.)S. 41(1) : Profits chargeable to tax-Remission or cessation of trading liability–Difference between creditors recorded in his books vis-a-vis balance in books of creditors-Sales and purchases not doubted–Addition is held to be not justified.
Tum Nath Shaw. v. ACIT (2019) 175 ITD 45 (Kol.)(Trib.)S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits -Purchase of jaggery from farmers- Disallowance is held to be not justified. [R. 6DD]
Tum Nath Shaw. v. ACIT (2019) 175 ITD 45 (Kol.)(Trib.)S. 40(b)(v) : Amounts not deductible–Partner–Remuneration– Book profit-Despite quantum not specified in partnership deed remuneration paid to partners is held to be allowable.
Unitec Marketing Services. v. ACIT (2019) 175 ITD 90 (Mum.) (Trib.)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure–Business commenced-Expansion of existing business-Preoperative expenses such as salaries and wages, PF and ESI contribution, travelling expenses, and like other general administrative expenses etc is held to be allowable. [S. 35D(1)(ii)]
Olive Bar & Kitchen (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 175 ITD 72 (Mum.) (Trib.)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure–Capital or revenue-ROC fees paid for increase in authorised capital for issuance of bonus shares was revenue expenditure-Matter remanded for verification.
Olive Bar & Kitchen (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 175 ITD 72 (Mum.) (Trib.)S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-suo moto disallowance–Further disallowances made by the AO is held to be not justified. [R. 8D(2)(iii)]
Olive Bar & Kitchen (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 175 ITD 72 (Mum.)(Trib.)