This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 36(1)(viii) : Eligible business-Special reserve-Providing long-term finance for Infrastructure Projects and facilities—Provision for bad and doubtful debts – held to be allowable. [S. 36(1)(viia)(c)]

Infrastructure Development Finance Co. Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 412 ITR 115/ 262 Taxman 483 /(2020) 190 DTR 137(Mad.)(HC)

S. 10B : Export oriented undertakings-New undertaking using building and machinery on lease from sister concern—”Transfer” Includes Lease—Not entitled to exemption.

Stabilix Solutions (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 412 ITR 82 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 10B : Export oriented undertakings-Setting off of carried forward losses-Matter remanded to Assessing Officer to decide afresh in light of decisions. [S. 10A]

Intimate Fashions (India) P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 412 ITR 615 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 10A : Free trade zone -Expenses incurred in foreign currency to be excluded from export turnover and total turnover— Compensation received on termination of export agreement constituted profits of business—Supply of software to another exporter—Entitled to Exemption-Loss Carried Forward From earlier years can be set off against income of current Year— Amendment by Finance Act, 2000.

CIT v. Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd. (2019) 412 ITR 468 (Karn)(HC)

S. 10(23G) : Infrastructure undertaking-Long term finance-Interest-Liquidated damages fall within the purview of word interest-Entitle to exemption. [S. 2 (28A)]

Infrastructure Development Finance Co. Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 412 ITR 115/ 262 Taxman 483 /(2020) 190 DTR 137 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 10(22) : Educational institution-Institution Should exist solely for educational purposes—Income from educational institution utilised to purchase immovable property in names of members of society—Not entitled to exemption.

Sree Chithra Educational, Cultural And Film Society v. DIT (2019) 412 ITR 76 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India–Royalty-The insertions of Explanations 5 & 6 to s. 9(1)(vi) by the Finance Act 2015 w.r.e.f. 01.04.1976, even if declaratory and clarificatory of the law, will not apply to the DTAAs. The DTAAs are a bilateral agreement between two Countries and cannot be overridden by a unilateral legislative amendment by one Country–Not liable to deduct tax at source -DTAA- India –Nether lands. [S. 195, Art.]

CIT v. Reliance Infocomm Ltd (2019) 179 DTR 112/ (2020) 314 CTR 551 (Bom.)(HC), www.itatonlin.org

S. 271AAB : Penalty-Search initiated on or after 1st July, 2012–Levy of penalty is not mandatory – Merely on the basis of surrender the levy of penalty is not justified. As regards cash found in the Couse of search which was not disclosed in the books of account, levy of penalty was confirmed.

Rambhajo’s v. ACIT (2019) 198 TTJ 142 / 175 DTR 161 (Jaipur) (Trib.)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal Powers-Stay-Penalty–Concealment– Quantum appeal pending before Tribunal–AO directed not to pass final penalty order – However, penalty proceedings not stayed. [S. 271(1)(c)]

Punjab Institute of Medical Science v. Dy. CIT (2019) 176 DTR 391/ 199 TTJ 271 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal–Powers-Remand with Directions– Consequential enhancement is held to be valid. [R. 8D]

Punjab State Co-Operative Milk Produce Federation Ltd. v ACIT (2019) 197 TTJ 642/ 174 DTR 155 (Chd.)(Trib.)