This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes – Surplus earned from organizing exhibition- As separate books of account is not maintained denial of exemption was held to be justified .[ S.11(4A) ]
Indian Machine Tools & Manufacturers Association v. DIT(E) (2018) 254 Taxman 243/ 165 DTR 1 / 302 CTR 289 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 10(46) Authority: Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority which is engaged in undertaking works relating to housing schemes and land development schemes including acquisition, distribution, sale and letting of properties is entitle to exemption .
Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority v. UOI (2018) 406 ITR 418/ 254 Taxman 289/ 303 CTR 512/ 167 DTR 153 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 10(38) : Long term capital gains from equities -Insurance business- Sale of investments is exempt from tax .[S.45 ]
PCIT v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (2018) 254 Taxman 238 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 10(23C) : Educational institution – Merely on the ground that surplus of society was utilized for expansion of school building, exemption cannot be denied .[ S.10(23C)(vi) ]
Mallikarjun School Society v. CCIT (2018) 254 Taxman 170/ 166 DTR 338/ 304 CTR 887 (Uttarakhand )(HC)
S. 2(42C) : Slump sale – There was neither any plant, machinery, furniture and fixtures, nor was there any building in existence at time when land was sold therefore it was not a slump sale.
PCIT v. Linde India Ltd. (2018) 254 Taxman 204 / 302 CTR 262(Cal.)(HC)
S. 237 : Refunds – Tax deducted at source- It is an obligation cast on revenue to effect refund, without calling upon assessees to apply for refund claim. Revenue was directed to grant refund with interest .
Gopalan Thygarajan v. CIT (2018) 253 Taxman 189 (Mad)(HC)
S. 153B : Assessment – Search – Time limit – On a remand under S. 263, such assessment would have to be completed only within a reasonable period of time. [ S.153A, 263 ]
K. V. Abdul Azeez v. CIT (2018)404 ITR 288/ 253 Taxman 210/ 168 DTR 74 / 304 CTR 801(Ker)(HC)
S.147: Reassessment -Share capital- Bogus accommodation entries – Reassessment was held to be valid [ S. 68 ,143(1),148 ]
Ankit Agrochem (P.) Ltd. v. JCIT (2018) 253 Taxman 141/172 DTR 46/( 2019) 306 CTR 657 (Raj)(HC)
S. 145 : Method of accounting – Mere fact that books of account were not supported by vouchers of payments received from patients, same could not be a ground to reject assessee’s books of account and to make addition on estimate basis
Dr. Prabhu Dayal Yadav. v. CIT (2018) 253 Taxman 191 /162 DTR 12 (All) (HC)