This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 2(24) : Income – Concept of real income- Statutory levy under the VAT Act, 2005 is being collected by virtue of the powers entrusted by the State Government to the assessee- entire collection is deposited in the Government Treasury of the State after deducting the actual expenditure incurred by the assessee- No real income accrues to the society-Not necessary to get registration u/s 12AA of the Act. [S. 4, 5, 12AA]
PCIT v. H.P. Excise & Taxation Technical Service Agency (2019) 260 Taxman 302/173 DTR 13 (HP)(HC).Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. H.P. Excise & Taxation Technical Service Agency ( 2019) 266 Taxman 280 (SC)
S. 2(ea) : Assets-Urban land-Belonging—Ownership-Owner-Pendency of litigation regarding ownership of land is pending for adjudication—Possession with assessee-Includible in net wealth– Protective assessment is held to be valid.
CIT v. Meenakshi Devi Avaru ( Smt) (Decd.) Through Legal Heirs. (2019) 410 ITR 306/ 176 DTR 1 / 308 CTR 83(Karn.)(HC) CIT v. Kamakshi Devi (Smt.) (2019) 410 ITR 306 (Karn.)(HC)
S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Tax consultant was indisposed about 7 months due to serious back injury–Delay was condoned–Matter remanded back for disposal on merits. [S. 153A]
Karanjia Terminal & Logistics (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2019) 260 Taxman 320 / 306 CTR 597(Bom.)(HC)
S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Doctrine of merger—Relief granted by CIT (A)-Revision to consider eligibility of exemption is held to be not valid [ S.10A(2)(ii), 10A(2)(iii)]
CIT v. S. R. A. Systems Ltd. (2019) 410 ITR 392 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Transfer of income without transfer of asset—Finding that arrangement was with intention to avoid incidence of tax in hands of owner Assessee–Income was taxed in hands of owner— No Infirmity In Order of Tribunal. [S. 22, 60]
Ambience Developers And Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT(2018) 171 DTR 369/ (2019) 410 ITR 289/ 307 CTR 516 (Delhi) (HC) Ambience Hotels and Resorts P. Ltd v. CIT(2018) 171 DTR 369/ (2019) 410 ITR 289 307 CTR 516 (Delhi) (HC)
S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal–Duties–Failure of Appellate Tribunal to consider the question of jurisdiction is miscarriage of justice–Tribunal is required to reassess material and thereafter come to a logical conclusion- Order of Tribunal is set aside. [S. 147]
Prameela Krishna (Smt.) v. ITO (2019) 261 Taxman 37 (Karn.)(HC)
S. 194H : Deduction at source–Commission or brokerage–Bank guarantee commission is not in the nature of commission paid to agent, it is bank charges for providing one of banking services – Not liable to deduct tax at source.
CIT v. Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (2019) 260 Taxman 271/ 307 CTR 464/ 174 DTR 246 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 142(2A) : Inquiry before assessment–Special audit–Method of accounting—Difficulty in allocating expenses-No allegation of mala fides—Order directing Special Audit is justified. [S. 80 IC, 145]
Patanjali Ayurveda Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 410 ITR 356 / 260 Taxman 253/ 173 DTR 105 /306 CTR 251(Delhi) (HC)
S. 139 : Return of income -Extension of due date- flood at State of Kerala -General direction for extending due date for filing returns would be contrary to scheme of Act- Specific grievances of assessees in individual cases could be dealt with by CBDT on receipt of the application-Court also directed the CBDT to consider holding a camp sitting in Kerala for the purposes of considering the applications of the assesses. [S. 119(2)(a)(b)], [139A]
Alwaye Chartered Accountants Association v. UOI (2019) 261 Taxman 4 (Ker.)(HC)