This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 143(2) : Assessment–Service of notice to manager is a valid service as the assessee has appeared before the Assessing Officer without taking any objection. [S. 292BB]

K.S. Cold Storage v. ACIT (2019) 174 ITD 485 /175 DTR 433/ 198 TTJ 905(Pune) (Trib.)

S. 73 : Losses in speculation business – Business of manufacturing and trading of soya premier nutrition and dairy products- Hedging of forward trading – No specific details shown by the assessee to demonstrate that to guard against loss through price fluctuation which might arise from contracts for delivery of goods- loss from alleged contracts did not fall under proviso (a) of section 43(5) of the Act. [ S.43(5)]

Premier Industries (India) Ltd. v. JCIT (2019) 174 ITD 415 (Indore)(Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources -Share holder -Close relatives -Transactions between close relatives provisions of S 56(2) (vii)(c) is not applicable-Revision on the basis of audit objection is held to be not valid [S. 56 (2) (vii)(c), 263]

Kumar Pappu Singh v. DCIT (2019) 174 ITD 465 / 175 DTR 198 (Visakha) (Trib.)

S. 54F : Capital gains – Investment in a residential house – Though new asset purchased within prescribed period had been let out would still be entitled to claim deduction. [S. 45]

ACIT v. Ishita Mohatta (Mrs.) (2019) 174 ITD 407 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 50C : Capital gains – Full value of consideration – Stamp valuation-Valuation of property submitted by the Assessee was rejected and referred the matter to DV0-Value adopted by the DVO is binding on the Assessing Officer. [S. 45]

Anil Murlidhar Deshmukh v. ITO (2019) 174 ITD 377 (SMC) (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 45 : Capital gains-Cold storage–Destruction by fire-Insurance claim-Insurance claim received was Rs.1.35 crores and reconstruction / renovation expenses incurred was Rs.3.55 crores-Amount received as claim cannot be assessed as short term capital gains. [S.45 (IA)]

K.S. Cold Storage v. ACIT (2019) 174 ITD 485/ 175 DTR 433/ 198 TTJ 905 (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 45 : Capital gains-Transfer-Capital asset-Deemed transfer-Amount received on assignment of by virtue of unregistered agreement of lease hold rights – After the amendment Act 2001 -Not liable to capital gains tax. [S. 2(14), 2(47(v), Transfer of Property Act, 1882 S.53A, Registration Act, 1908, S.17, 49]

Mallika Investment Co. (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 174 ITD 386 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible – Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits -Payments were made during public holidays -No disallowance could be made – Payments to agents- No disallowance can be made. [R.6DDJ, 6DDK ]

Surya Merchants Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 174 ITD 393 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Real estate developer–Advertising and business promotion-Corporate brand identity exercise, logo design etc is allowable as deduction as it is not attributable to any particular project -Amount spent on Liaisoning work in relation to a particular project has to be capitalised to concerned project -Method of accounting–AS-7 or AS 9 or ICAI guidance note on accounting for real estate transactions, 2006 cannot be said to be either cash system of accounting or mercantile system of accounting , only up to AY. 2012-13. [S. 145]

Indiabuild Villas Development (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2018) 196 TTJ 386 /(2019) 174 ITD 497/ 175 DTR 226 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital – Loan for reconstruction or renovation of its existing cold storage which was destroyed by fire, could not be considered as acquisition of an asset- Interest is held to be allowable .

K.S. Cold Storage v. ACIT (2019) 174 ITD 485 / 175 DTR 433/ 198 TTJ 905(Pune)(Trib.)