S. 147: Reassessment — Failure to issue notice u/s 143(2) , reassessment was held to be in valid [ S. 143(2) , 148 , 292BB]
Ramesh Salecha HUF v. ITO (2018) 61 ITR 632 (Mum) (Trib)S. 147: Reassessment — Failure to issue notice u/s 143(2) , reassessment was held to be in valid [ S. 143(2) , 148 , 292BB]
Ramesh Salecha HUF v. ITO (2018) 61 ITR 632 (Mum) (Trib)S. 147 : Reassessment –With in four years-Derived from- Export benefits – Decision of the Supreme Court was operative when the return was filed – Reassessment was held to be valid [ S. 80IC, 148 ]
DCIT v. Century Textiles And Industries Ltd. (2018) 61 ITR 647/ 162 DTR 247 /191 TTJ 483 (Mum) (Trib)S. 147: Reassessment – Bogus accommodation entries – Order was passed before expiry of four weeks of passing the orders of objection – Non application of mind while recording reasons – Order was held to be bad in law [ S. 148 ]
Meta Plast Engineering P. Ltd. v. ITO ( Delhi)(Trib) , www.itatonline.orgS. 147: Reassessment —Deemed dividend – Notice based on information received from another assessee’s assessing authority was held to be valid [ S. 2(22)( e ), 143(1), 148 ]
Sunrise Broking Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2018) 400 ITR 337 (Guj) (HC)S. 147:Reassessment —Assessment of subsequent year showing that claims allowed in original assessments were based on erroneous statement by assessee — Reassessment notice was held to be valid [ S.148 ]
S.C. Johnson Products P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 400 ITR 426/ 253 Taxman 108 / 161 DTR 209 (Delhi) (HC)S. 147: Reassessment —Cash credits –No specific direction- Finding of the CIT(A) in assessment year , 2012-13 stating that the amount assessable in the years 2009-10 and 2010 -2011- Reassessment was held to be valid [ S. 68, 148 ]
Alfa Investments. v. ITO (2018) 400 ITR 445/ 161 DTR 155 / 300 CTR 85 (Mad) (HC)Editorial: Affirmed by division Bench , Alfa Investments. v. ITO (2018) ( 2018) 304 CTR 425 ( Mad) (HC) Editorial: Affirmed by division Bench , Alfa Investments. v. ITO (2018) ( 2018) 304 CTR 425 ( Mad) (HC)S. 147: Reassessment — With in four years -Change of opinion- Reassessment was held to be not valid [ S. 148 ]
Vijay Harishchandra Patel. v. ITO (2018) 400 ITR 167/ 167 DTR 475 (Guj) (HC)S. 147 : Reassessment –With in four years-Original assessment reassessment was held to be invalid for non service of notice u/s 143(2)- Notice reassessment on same ground was held to be valid .[ S.143(2), 148 ].
Krishna Developers and Co. v. DCIT (2018) 400 ITR 260 (Guj) (HC)Editorial: SLP of assessee is dismissed, Krishna Developers and Co. v. DCIT ( 2018) 254 Taxman 125 ( SC)S.147:Reassesment –With in four years-Audit objection- Reply of Assessing Officer to audit objection opposing the reassessment- , Apex court Judgement was not available- Reassessment was held to be bad in law . [ S. 80IB, 148 ]
CIT v. Rajan N. Aswani ( 2018) 403 ITR 30 / 165 DTR 371 (Bom)(HC) , www.itatonline.orgS.147: Reassessment- Failure in computing income from outside India at a low rate – Reassessment was held to be valid [ S. 44BB, 148 ]
Invensys Process Systems (S) v. ADIT (2018) 252 Taxman 199 (Uttarakhand) (HC)