This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty – Concealment -Disallowance of claim -Rejection of revised return-Mere making claim which is unsustainable in law will not amount to furnishing inadequate particulars ; what the law contemplates is making of a false claim or claim which is not bona fide – Deletion of penalty is held to be justified. [ S.80IC ]

PCIT v. Mahima Udyog ( 2018( 2018) 303 CTR 633 /168 DTR 29( Uttarakhand) (HC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax -Power subsidy- Capital or revenue- Purpose test- Power subsidy which is available only to new units and units which have undergone an expansion , purpose being incentive as a capital subsidy has to be regarded as capital receipts .[ S.28(i) ]

PCIT v. Shyam Steel Industries Ltd ( 2018) 303 CTR 628/168 DTR 152 ( Cal) (HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal – Duties- It would always be ideal for the Tribunal to consider the entire issues in an appeal , so that the parties can have a quietus to the matter.

Nishant Export v. ACIT (2018) 401 ITR 401 / 168 DTR 157 / 303 CTR 624 (Ker) (HC)

S. 158BB : Block assessment – Undisclosed income – Gift-Statement during search proceedings- Retraction-Books of account-Oral statement -Evidentiary value -Found and evidence found- Divergence opinion among Courts-Referred to larger Bench (CIT v. DPA Harjeev ( 2016) 241 Taxman 199/ 6 ITR -OL 504 ( Delhi) (HC), CIT v. Hotel Meriya ( 2011) 332 ITR 537 ( Ker) (HC) [ S. 68, 131,132(4), 158BA, Evidence Act, 1872 , S.3, 57, 114 ]

CIT v. M.S. Aggarwal ( 2018) 406 ITR 609 /93 taxmann.com 247 / 303 CTR 560/ 166 DTR 121( Delhi) ( HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue -Dissolution of company-Taken over by limited liability partnership-Opportunity of hearing must be granted to successor before passing the order-Matter remanded to the Tribunal .

Brolly Dealcom LLP v. CIT (2018) 406 ITR 542 / 304 CTR 783 (Cal) (HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal – Duties- Consolidation of appeals on the request of the department without adequate notice to the assessee is quashed [ S.253]

BPTP LTD. v. CIT (2018) 406 ITR 475/257 Taxman 456 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel -Draft assessment order- Limitation- Quoting wrong provision in the assessment order in consequential-Alternative remedy – Writ is not maintainable .[S. 92CA, 246(1)(A), Art . 226 ]

Inno Estates Pvt. Ltd. v. DRP-2 (2018) 406 ITR 553/ 258 Taxman 160 / ( 2019) 179 CTR 228/ 309 CTR 372 (Mad) (HC)

S. 139AA: Return of income – Quoting of Aadhaar Number – Permanent Account number— Provision making it compulsory for all assessees to obtain Aadhaar Card and quote Aadhaar number to prescribed authority —Extension of time by Circular issued by CBDT -Directions issued stating that return filed by the assessee should be processed accordingly . [ Art .226 ]

Mukul Talwar. v. UOI (2018) 406 ITR 472/ 303 CTR 639 /168 DTR 111 (Delhi) (HC) Vrinda Grover v. UOI (2018) 406 ITR 472/ 303 CTR 639/168 DTR 111 (Delhi) (HC)/ Pradeep Kumar v. UOI ( 2018) 303 CTR 636 /168 DTR 108 ( P& H) (HC)

S. 43A : Rate of exchange – Actual cost- Depreciation- Notional fluctuation- Imported assets acquired in foreign currency — Fluctuation in rate of exchange — Adjustment can be made at each date of balance-sheet pending actual payment. [ S.32 ]

CIT v. Phonex Lamps India Ltd. (2018) 406 ITR 550 (All) (HC)

S. 35D : Amortisation of preliminary expenses -Expenses incurred on issue of public subscription of shares or of debentures of the company, any payment made against commission, brokerage and charges for drafting, typing, printing and advertisement of the prospectus would be eligible for benefit.

CIT v. Phonex Lamps India Ltd. (2018) 406 ITR 550 (All) (HC)