This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax -VAT subsidy -Refund of value added tax was held to be capital receipt and not chargeable to tax . [ S. 2(24)(xviii) , 43(1) ]

CIT v. Deepak Vegpro Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 401 ITR 89 /164 DTR 226/ 302 CTR 269 (Raj) (HC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax -Accrual – Interest on project advance –Development agreement has not taken place as the interest has not accrued, income cannot be assessed on hypothetical basis [ S.145 ]

CIT v. Godrej Reality ( P) Ltd ( 2018) 161 DTR 417 / 300 CTR 257( Bom) (HC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax – Capital or revenue- Notional sales tax – Question of law [ S. 260A ]

CIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd ( 2018) 161 DTR 420 /( 2019) 410 ITR 468 ( Bom) (HC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax –Capital or revenue – Causal and non –recurring- Capital gains- Compensation paid for breach of contract was held to be capital in nature [ S. 2(24), 10(33) 45. 55(2)(a) ]

CIT v. Parle Soft Drinks (Bangalore Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 400 ITR 108/ 161 DTR 86/ 252 Taxman 147 / 300 CTR 415 (Bom) (HC) CIT v. Parle Bottling Pvt Ltd (2018) 400 ITR 108/ 161 DTR 86 / 252 Taxman 147 / 300 CTR 415 /(2017) 88 Taxmann.com 24 (Bom) (HC) Editorial ; Order in Parle Soft Drinks P. Ltd. v. JCIT ( 2013) 27 ITR 663 ( Mum) (Trib) is affirmed. Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed CIT v. Parle Soft Drinks (Bangalore Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 258 Taxman 6 (SC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax -Mutual concerns –Surplus earned was spent for common benefit of members of for carrying on objects of the Club – Principle of mutuality is applicable and surplus cannot be brought to tax .

ITO v. Gymkhana Club. (2018) 168 ITD 64/ 167 DTR 113/ 192 TTJ 571 (Chd) (Trib.)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax – Interest on amount of sundry debtors outstanding cannot be charged on accrual basis [ S. 145 ]

DCIT v. Narayani Ispat Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 61 ITR 371 (Kolk) (Trib)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax – Mutuality- Receipts by Co -operative society form its members ie. Non-occupancy charges , transfer charges common amenity fund charges and other charges , are exempt from income -tax Act based on the principle of mutuality [S. 2(24), Maharashtra Co -operative Societies Act , 1960 , S. 79A ]

ITO v. Venkatesh Premises Co -operative Society Ltd ( 2018) 402 ITR 670/ 163 DTR 465/301 CTR 514/ 254 Taxman 313 ( SC) Editorial: From the judgement of Bombay High Court in ITO v. Venkatesh Premises Co -operative Society Ltd (ITA No 680 of 2009 dt 11-1-2010) Mittal Court Premises Co -operative Society Ltd v. ITO ( 2010) 320 ITR 414 ( Bom) (HC) , and CIT v. Shree Parleshwar Co -op- Housing Society Ltd ( 2017) 10 ITR-OL 202 ( Bom) (HC) is affirmed

S.2(14)(iii) : Capital asset – Agricultural land -Capital gains- Business income- Sale of agricultural land purchased on good price and purchasing the land of higher volumes at different places cannot be regarded as trader- Entitle to exemption. [ S. 2(14) , 28(i)]

Shailesh Gangaram Ramani. v. ITO (2018) 168 ITD 446 (Rajkot) (Trib.)

S. 2(22)(e) Deemed dividend-Beneficial owner – Prima facie, CIT v. Ankitech pvt Ltd ( 2012) 340 ITR 14 ( Delhi)( HC) and CIT v. Madhur Housing and development company ( 2018) 401 ITR 152 (SC) , is wrongly decided and should be reconsidered by larger bench.

National Travel Service v. CIT ( 2018) 401 ITR 154 / 162 DTR 201 / 300 CTR 582 / 253 Taxman 243 (SC) CIT v. Mahavir Inductomelt ( P) Ltd ( 2018) 401 ITR 154/ 162 DTR 201/ 300 CTR 582 (SC)

S. 2(22)(e):Deemed dividend -loans from two companies addition cannot be made as deemed dividend [ S. 260A ]

CIT v. Gladder Ceramics Ltd. (2018) 401 ITR 205 (Guj) (HC)