This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 221 : Collection and recovery-Penalty-Tax in default-Return filed in wrong form-Writ petition dismissed-Granted liberty to file application for rectification with direction to Department to consider permitting assessee to file return of income in appropriate form. [S. 139(4A), 154, 221(1), Art. 226]
Cutler Hammer Provident Fund Trust v. ITO [2024] 166 taxmann.com 402(2025)478 ITR 231 (P&H)(HC). Editorial : SLP of assessee dismissed, Cutler Hammer Provident Fund Trust v.ITO (2025) 305 Taxman 167 / 478 ITR 235 (SC)
S.206AA: Requirement to furnish Permanent Account Number-Deduction of tax at source-Immoveable property-Where purchasers deducted tax at source at 1% under section 194-IA on sale consideration and vendor had furnished PAN which was accepted by the Department’s portal, subsequent demand treating PAN as invalid and alleging short deduction at 20% under section 206AA was unjustified-PAN had been linked with Aadhaar and late fee paid by vendor-No failure on part of deductors-Orders passed without considering relevant material and in violation of principles of natural justice were quashed. [S.194-IA, Income-tax Rules, 1962 r.30(2A), Art.226
Harsha Sunil Shah v. ACIT(2025) 478 ITR 413 (Mad)(HC). Sunil Navin Chandra Shah v. ACIT (2025) 478 ITR 413 (Mad)(HC).
S. 201 : Deduction at source-Failure to deduct or pay-Compensation for acquisition of land-Deduction of tax on payment of interest on compensation or enhanced compensation-Legal advice-Land Acquisition Officer acted upon directions of his superior, District Revenue Officer who in turn took legal advice which was based on High Court order-Land Acquisition Officer not at fault-Order levying penalty set aside.[S.45(5)(b), 56(2)(viii), 194A, 194LA, Land Acquisition Act, 1894.S. 28, Art. 226]
Land Acquisition Officer, Urban Estate v. ACIT [2024] 166 taxmann.com 325 / (2025) 478 ITR 648 (P & H) (HC)
S. 153D : Assessment-Search-Approval-Mechanical approval invalid.[S. 132, 153A, 260A]
PCIT v. Subash Dabas (2025) 478 ITR 217 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search- Assessment order passed many years after assessee had filed return-Order passed without giving assessee opportunity to be heard-Order to be treated as notice and assessment to be made after giving assessee opportunity of being heard-The Assessing Officer was directed to provide a reasonable opportunity to be heard, including a personal hearing, and thereafter issue a fresh assessment order within two months. [S. 132, 143(3)]
Jaihan Infrastructure v. Dy. CIT (2025) 478 ITR 561 (Mad)(HC)
S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Objection to jurisdiction-Delay in filing-Writ petition to quash the assessment order is dismissed. [S. 132, Art.226]
Ranjana Agarwal v. ACIT (2025) 478 ITR 463 (All)(HC)
S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Not typographical error-Sanction for issue of notice-Principal commissioner-Non application of mind-Approval under section 151 granted without proper application of mind-High Court quashed notices and orders-SLP delay of 181 days-SLP dismissed on grounds of delay and on merits. [S. 148 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 136]
Asst. CIT v. Teleperformance Global Service Pvt. Ltd. (2025) 478 ITR 78/170 taxmann.com 832 (SC) Editorial : Teleperformance Global Service Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 298 Taxman 79 / (2025) 478 ITR 74 (Bom)(HC)
S. 149 : Reassessment-Time limit for notice-Non-resident-Assets located outside India-Rule against retrospectivity-Intent and language to be considered-Whether new time limit would apply where assessments concluded prior to date of amendment-Matter referred to larger Bench-Finance Act 2012) (2012) 345 ITR 1 (St). [S. 147, 148, 149(1(c), Art. 226]
U. K. Paints (Overseas) Ltd v. ACIT (2025) 478 ITR 326 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Amalgamation-Notice issued to non-existent transferor assessee after court-approved amalgamation-Assessment order passed against dissolved company-Notice and consequential proceedings invalid.[S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
Pon Pure Chem Pvt. Ltd.v. NFAC (2025) 478 ITR 723 (Mad)(HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Conversion of firm into private limited company-Notice in name of non-existent dissolved firm-Reassessment proceedings initiated against dissolved firm-All transactions actually conducted by successor company using its permanent account number-Department’s failure to consider conversion despite intimation Notice issued under section 148 and reassessment proceedings and reassessment order passed in name of non-existent firm set aside.[S. 142(1) 144, 144B, 147, 148, Art. 226]
NRP Projects Pvt. Ltd. (successor to the erstwhile firm N.R. Patel and Co.) v.NFAC (2025) 478 ITR 690 (Mad)(HC)