This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 226 : Collection and recovery-Stay of demand-Pendency of appeal before CIT(A)-CBDT Circular-No statutory requirement of pre-deposit under the Act-Direction to deposit 20% of disputed demand based solely on CBDT Office Memorandum dated 31-7-2017-Executive instructions cannot override or impose conditions contrary to statute-Where serious prejudice likely and case treated as non-priority by Department, exemption from pre-deposit ought to be granted-Order rejecting stay set aside and recovery and penalty proceedings stayed [S. 119, 246A, 250, 271F, 274; Art. 226]

Dumka Catholic Diocese v. PCIT (2025) 478 ITR 209 / 178 taxmann.com 97 (Jharkhand) (HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue, dismissed, PCIT v. Dumka Catholic Diocese (2025) 478 ITR 215 / 178 taxmann.com 165 (SC)

S. 226 : Collection and recovery-Stay of demand-Pendency of appeal before CIT(A)-CBDT Circular-No statutory requirement of pre-deposit under the Act-Direction to deposit 20% of disputed demand based solely on CBDT Office Memorandum dated 31-7-2017-Executive instructions cannot override or impose conditions contrary to statute-Where serious prejudice likely and case treated as non-priority by Department, exemption from pre-deposit ought to be granted-Order rejecting stay set aside and recovery and penalty proceedings stayed by High Court-SLP of revenue dismissed.[S. 119, 246A, 250, 271F, 274; Art.136]

PCIT v. Dumka Catholoic Diocese (2025) 478 ITR 215/178 taxmann.com 165 (SC) Editorial : Dumka Catholoic Diocese. v.PCIT (2025) 478 ITR 209 /178 taxmann.com 97 (Jharkhand)(HC)

S. 221 : Collection and recovery-Penalty-Tax in default-Return filed in wrong form-Writ petition dismissed-Granted liberty to file application for rectification with direction to Department to consider permitting assessee to file return of income in appropriate form-SLP of assessee dismissed. [S. 139(4A), 154, 221(1), Art. 136]

Cutler Hammer Provident Fund Trust v ITO (2025) 478 ITR 235/305 Taxman 167 (SC) Editorial : Cutler Hammer Provident Fund Trust v. ITO [2024] 166 taxmann.com 402 (2025) 478 ITR 231 (P & H) (HC)

S. 221 : Collection and recovery-Penalty-Tax in default-Return filed in wrong form-Writ petition dismissed-Granted liberty to file application for rectification with direction to Department to consider permitting assessee to file return of income in appropriate form. [S. 139(4A), 154, 221(1), Art. 226]

Cutler Hammer Provident Fund Trust v. ITO [2024] 166 taxmann.com 402(2025)478 ITR 231 (P&H)(HC). Editorial : SLP of assessee dismissed, Cutler Hammer Provident Fund Trust v.ITO (2025) 305 Taxman 167 / 478 ITR 235 (SC)

S.206AA: Requirement to furnish Permanent Account Number-Deduction of tax at source-Immoveable property-Where purchasers deducted tax at source at 1% under section 194-IA on sale consideration and vendor had furnished PAN which was accepted by the Department’s portal, subsequent demand treating PAN as invalid and alleging short deduction at 20% under section 206AA was unjustified-PAN had been linked with Aadhaar and late fee paid by vendor-No failure on part of deductors-Orders passed without considering relevant material and in violation of principles of natural justice were quashed. [S.194-IA, Income-tax Rules, 1962 r.30(2A), Art.226

Harsha Sunil Shah v. ACIT(2025) 478 ITR 413 (Mad)(HC). Sunil Navin Chandra Shah v. ACIT (2025) 478 ITR 413 (Mad)(HC).

S. 201 : Deduction at source-Failure to deduct or pay-Compensation for acquisition of land-Deduction of tax on payment of interest on compensation or enhanced compensation-Legal advice-Land Acquisition Officer acted upon directions of his superior, District Revenue Officer who in turn took legal advice which was based on High Court order-Land Acquisition Officer not at fault-Order levying penalty set aside.[S.45(5)(b), 56(2)(viii), 194A, 194LA, Land Acquisition Act, 1894.S. 28, Art. 226]

Land Acquisition Officer, Urban Estate v. ACIT [2024] 166 taxmann.com 325 / (2025) 478 ITR 648 (P & H) (HC)

S. 153D : Assessment-Search-Approval-Mechanical approval invalid.[S. 132, 153A, 260A]

PCIT v. Subash Dabas (2025) 478 ITR 217 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search- Assessment order passed many years after assessee had filed return-Order passed without giving assessee opportunity to be heard-Order to be treated as notice and assessment to be made after giving assessee opportunity of being heard-The Assessing Officer was directed to provide a reasonable opportunity to be heard, including a personal hearing, and thereafter issue a fresh assessment order within two months. [S. 132, 143(3)]

Jaihan Infrastructure v. Dy. CIT (2025) 478 ITR 561 (Mad)(HC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Objection to jurisdiction-Delay in filing-Writ petition to quash the assessment order is dismissed. [S. 132, Art.226]

Ranjana Agarwal v. ACIT (2025) 478 ITR 463 (All)(HC)

S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Not typographical error-Sanction for issue of notice-Principal commissioner-Non application of mind-Approval under section 151 granted without proper application of mind-High Court quashed notices and orders-SLP delay of 181 days-SLP dismissed on grounds of delay and on merits. [S. 148 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 136]

Asst. CIT v. Teleperformance Global Service Pvt. Ltd. (2025) 478 ITR 78/170 taxmann.com 832 (SC) Editorial : Teleperformance Global Service Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 298 Taxman 79 / (2025) 478 ITR 74 (Bom)(HC)