This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 244A: Refund-Interest on refund-Technical glitch causing TDS credit not reflected in e-filed revised return though appearing in Form 26AS-Assessee promptly informed Assessing Officer and lodged complaint with CPC-Denial of interest by Assessing Officer on ground of lapse by assessee-Not justified-Under section 244A (2), power to exclude any period attributable to assessee vests only in Principal Chief Commissioner or Commissioner, not Assessing Officer. [S. 154]
Pr. CIT v. HCL Infotech (P) Ltd. (2026) 349 CTR 609 / 184 taxmann.com 38 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 201 : Deduction at source-Failure to deduct or pay-Limitation-Filing of TDS statement-Limitation operates quarter-wise and not on an annual basis. [S. 201(1), 201(IA), 201(3), 260A, Rule 31A]
CIT v. Vodafone Cellular Ltd. (2026) 349 CTR 783 (Bom)(HC).
S. 197: Deduction at source-Certificate for lower rate-Foreign company-Earlier High Court orders granting nil rate-Certificate cannot be denied without recording a change in facts. [S. 6(3), Rule 28AA, Art. 226]
SFDC Ireland Ltd. v. CIT (2026) 349 CTR 729 / 182 taxmann.com 533 (Delhi)(HC).
S. 195 : Deduction at source-Non-resident-Other sums-Remittances to a company of Singapore under a service agreement and was treated as assessee in default for non-deduction of TDS on grounds of inadequate invoice descriptions-Assessing Officer failed to examine whether services ‘made available’ technical knowledge as per Article 12(4) of India-Singapore DTAA, such order was legally unsustainable-Order was quashed-DTAA-India-Singapore [S.9(1)(vi),201, Art. 12(4), Art. 226]
Sulvay Specialities India (P) Ltd. v. ACIT(IT). (2026) 349 CTR 1/ 183 taxmann.com 570 (Guj)(HC)
S. 158BA: Block assessment-Undisclosed income-Search under section 132 was conducted during pendency of assessment proceedings-Abatement under section 158BA(2), relief was denied as no material showed that the search concerned assessee in his individual status or revealed undisclosed income for the block period; consequently, writ challenging assessment and penalty proceedings was to be dismissed. [S. 132, 153A, Art. 226]
Saroj Kumar Sahoo v. NFAC (2026) 349 CTR 249/ 184 taxmann.com 90 (Orissa)(HC)
S. 153B: Assessment-Search-Limitation-Extension of limitation period due to a reference made to foreign authorities under a tax treaty-Reference must be valid under the specific provisions of the relevant protocol-Following search in AMQ group, Assessing Officer made FT&TR reference seeking Hong Kong information for assessment year 2017-18, since India-Hong Kong DTAA effective 30-11-2018 permitted exchange only for subsequent fiscal years, such reference was impermissible and no limitation extension under Explanation (ix) to section 153B was available-DTAA-India-Hong Kong. [S. 147, 148,260A Art. 26]
Pr. CIT v. Sanjay Jain (2026) 349 CTR 699 / 183 taxmann.com 129 (Delhi)(HC)
S.153A: Assessment-Search-No actual search conducted-Survey converted to search without due process-Notices lacking reasons and unsupported by incriminating material-Notices quashed.[S. 132, 133A, 153B, Art. 226]
B and B Mercantile (P.) Ltd. v. DIT (INV) (2026) 310 Taxman 345 /349 CTR 745 (Raj.)(HC)
S. 151A: Faceless assessment of income escaping assessment-Reassessment-Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) as well as Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) possess concurrent jurisdiction to initiate reassessment proceedings under section 148-Notice issued by JAO is valid and not in contravention of the statutory scheme under section 151A. [S. 147, 148 Art. 226]
Inder Dev Gupta v. ACIT [2025] 180 taxmann.com 805/ (2026) 349 CTR 688 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 151: Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Cash credits-Share capital and share premium received-Accommodation entries-Reopening of assessment-Approval under section 151-Single line approval recording satisfaction held valid-Competent Authority used language ‘Yes, I am convinced it is a fit case for reopening of assessment under section 147 by issuing notice under section 148’, same would satisfy the mandate of section 151-ITAT order quashing reassessment set aside low tax effect-Exception. [S. 68, 147, 148, 268A]
Pr. CIT v. Agroha Fincap Ltd. [2025] 179 taxmann.com 185 / (2026) 349 CTR 450 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial: SLP of assessee dismissed, Agroha Fincap Ltd v. PCIT [2026] 186 taxmann.com 281 (SC)
S. 149: Reassessment-Time limit for notice-Notice issued under section 148, pursuant to an order passed under section 148A(d), beyond the prescribed statutory period of 30 days was bad in law. [S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), TOLA S. 3, Art. 226]
Jasbir Singh Oberoi v. UOI [2026] 184 taxmann.com 726 / 349 CTR 585 (J&K) (HC)