This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

Expenditure Tax Act, 1987.
S. 11:Reassessment- Expenditure-tax-Reassessment -No limitation was prescribed – Not barred by limitation- Appeal-High Court- Court cannot reappreciate evidence to record a different finding of fact even if another view possible on basis of material on record- SLP dismissed.[S. 8, 9, 11(1)(a), 11(1)b), Art. 136]

Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. v CIT (2025) 477 ITR 355 (SC) Editorial : Himachal Pradesh Tourism Dev. Corp. Ltd v. CIT (2025) 477 ITR 349 (HP)(HC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty – Concealment-Settlement commission- Burden of proof- Burden on revenue to prove concealment of income-Order of Settlement Commission set aside.[S. 50C, 245D, 271(1) explanation (c), Art. 226]

Rajendra Prasad Agarwal v. ITSC [2024] 161 taxmann.com 638 /(2025) 477 ITR 104 (All)(HC)

S. 269UC : Purchase by Central Government of immoveable properties – Restrictions on transfer-Failure by Government to deposit apparent consideration within stipulated time pursuant to order of Appropriate Authority for compulsory purchase-Parties terminating agreement and vendors selling property to new purchaser Suit filed by new purchaser for declaration that order for compulsory purchase stood abrogated and all rights in property vested in its favour-Abrogation of order taking place by operation of law consequent upon failure to deposit consideration within time frame as stipulated in section 269UG-No question of giving a further declaration that order cancelled or set aside-Not a case where order for compulsory purchase being “called in question” by filing suit if decreed will not have effect of setting aside or modifying order of Appropriate Authority-Suit neither barred under provisions of section 269UN or section 293- Order of single judge holding suit barred set aside and suit restored-Called in question”-“Abrogate” [S. 269UD, 269UE(1), 269UF, 269UG, 269UH, 269UN, 293, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, S. 9.]

Sasmita Investments Ltd. v Appropriate Authority & Ors. (2025) 477 ITR 534 /174 taxmann.com 656 (Bom)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Amalgamation- Depreciation-Demerger-Goodwill-Difference between net assets and shares to be issued credited as goodwill and depreciation allowed – Scrutiny assessment- Order of Tribunal setting aside revision order was affirmed.[S. 32(1), 43(6), Expln. 3(b), 143(3), 260A]

PCIT v. Aculife Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (2023) 155 taxmann.com 283 / (2025) 477 ITR 392 (Guj)(HC) Editorial : SLP rejected, PCIT v. Aculife Healthcare Pvt. Ltd [2025] 477 ITR 398 / 177 taxmann.com 79 (SC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Amalgamation-Depreciation-Demerger-Goodwill-Difference between net assets and shares to be issued credited as goodwill and depreciation allowed – Scrutiny assessment- Order of Tribunal setting aside revision order was affirmed by High Court – SLP of revenue was dismissed, [S. 32(1), 43(6), Expln. 3(b), 143(3) Art, 136.]

PCIT. v. Aculife Healthcare Pvt. Ltd.( 2025) 477 ITR 398/ 177 taxmann.com 79 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Aculife Healthcare Pvt. Ltd( 2023) 155 taxmann.com 283 / (2025) 477 ITR 392 (Guj)(HC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Delay in filing appeal-Discretion to condone delay-Sufficient cause for delay-Delay to be condoned.

PCIT v. North Eastern Electric Power Corporation Ltd.( 2025) 477 ITR 376 (Maghalaya)(HC)

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals) – Procedure-Additional grounds -Death of assessee-Pendency of application- Order dismissing the appeal – Order set aside and matter remanded to appellate authority for disposal of appeal afresh in light of application for additional grounds and orders passed by Assessing Officer for other years.[S. 246A, Art. 226]

Estate of the late Nagarathna Rajappa v. ITO (2025) 477 ITR 372 (Kar)(HC)

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Procedure – Application-Single judge allowing writ petition filed by Commissioner of Wealth-tax and Commissioner of Income-tax against order under section 245D(4) passed by Settlement Commission No allegation that decision of Settlement Commission not in accordance with provisions of Act or based on bias, fraud and malice-Order of single judge in writ petition set aside-Blackstonian theory- Precedent Retrospective application of later judicial decision theory-Decision rendered later would have retrospective effect clarifying legal position which was earlier not correctly understood.[S. 245B(3), 245D(4) Art. 226]

Sri Krishna Tiles and Potteries (Madras) Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2025) 477 ITR 595 /175 taxmann.com 883 (Mad)(HC) Sri Krishna Tiles and Potteries (Madras) Pvt. Ltd. v. CWT (2025) 477 ITR 595 /175 taxmann.com 883 (Mad)(HC) Editorial : Decision of single judge in CWT v. ITSC ( 2021) 435 ITR 583 ( Mad)( HC)), reversed.

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Return of income-Delay in filing of return – waiver of interest-Delayed filing of return as of copies of documents seized by Department not supplied in time to assessee-Cause for delay accepted by Settlement Commission-Settlement Commission reducing interest to 50 per cent.-No reasons assigned for partial reduction of interest-Complete waiver warranted when circumstances beyond assessee’s control Income- Advance tax- Seizure of cash not related to payment of advance tax-Settlement Commission right in refusing to waive interest for default in payment of advance tax. [S.220(2), 234B, 234C, 245D(4), Art. 226]

Sant Lal and others. v. ITSC (2025) 477 ITR 422 (P&H)(HC) Editorial : SLP of assessee dismissed, Hari Chand an. v. ITSC (2025) 477 ITR 429 (SC)

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Advance tax-Interest-Search and seizure-Seizure of cash not related to payment of advance tax High Court holding Settlement Commission right in refusing to waive interest for default in payment of advance tax – SLP of assesseee dismissed. [S. 234B. 234C, 245D(4), Art. 136]

Hari Chand and Ors v. ITSC (2025) 477 ITR 429 (SC) Editorial : Refer, Sanat Lal v.ITSC (2025) 477 ITR 422 ( P& H)( HC)