S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Procedure-Application-Search and seizure and Survey-Disclosing unaccounted income-Order of settlement Commission on basis of volumetric report of person not qualified and incompetent to evaluate mined ore submitted by department is unsustainable-Withdrawal of writ petition against survey proceedings with liberty to pursue issue of volumetric report before Settlement Commission-No presumption of estoppel against assessee by withdrawal of writ petition-Assessment of undisclosed income can be done only with reference to incriminating material recovered from search and not post search material-Report stating inaccuracies of report prepared by incompetent person and submitted by Department-Dismissal of statutory mining plan prepared under mines and minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 and approved by IBM-Order of Settlement Commission erroneous-Matter remanded to Settlement Commission.[S. 132, 132, 133A, 153A, 245C, 245D(4) Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957, Art. 226]
S. R. Ferro Alloys v. ITSC (2024)469 ITR 438 / 81 taxmann.com 481 (MP)(HC)