This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 201 : Deduction at source-Failure to deduct or pay-Local Authority-Leave encashment-liable to deduct tax considering the exemption limit up to 3 lakhs-Revenue authorities are directed to recompute the quantum of tax deductible. [S.10(10AA), 201(1), 201(IA)]

Vadodara Urban Development Authority. v. ITO (TDS) (2025) 210 ITD 185 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 194A : Deduction at source-Interest other than interest on securities-Intermediary between clients-Not required to deduct TDS under section 194A in respect of payment made to its clients.[S. 2(28A)]

DCIT v. Anand Rathi Commodities Ltd. (2025) 210 ITD 239 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 153A: Assessment-Search-Unabated assessments-No incriminating material was found during search-Addition is deleted. [S. 14A, 132, 132A, 147, 148]

S.R. Ingots (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 210 ITD 254 (Raipur) (Trib.)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-DRP order was uploaded on ITBA portal on 26-5-2022-Assessment was to be completed on or before 30-6-2022-Assessment order passed on 1-7-2022 was null and void is barred by limitation.[S.92CA, 144C(13)]

Hyundai Rotem Company Indian Project Offices v. ACIT IT, (2025) 210 ITD 326 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 115J : Company-Book profit-Adjustment-Exempt income-Matter remanded.[S. 14A, R.8D]

S.R. Ingots (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 210 ITD 254 (Raipur) (Trib.)

S. 69C: Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-Deletion of addition by CIT(A) is affirmed. [S. 147]

ITO v. Sumit Agrawal. (2025) 210 ITD 177 (Raipur) (Trib.)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Cash deposit in bank-Non-Resident-Withdrawal from bank-Addition is deleted.

Rekha Sanjeev Bhatt v. ITO (2025)210 ITD 690 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 69 :Unexplained investments-Investment in an immovable property in India-Explained the source-Addition is deleted-Registration and stamp charges-Source explained-Addition is deleted.

Rekha Sanjeev Bhatt v. ITO (2025)210 ITD 690 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Produced,identity, genuineness of transaction and creditworthiness, along with confirmation and proof of regular banking channel-Lender’s failure to respond to summons alone did cannot be the ground to treat the loan as cash credits. [S. 131]

Golden Moment (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 210 ITD 484 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 54F : Capital gains-Investment in a residential house-Residential property was purchased in his wife’s name-Entitle to deduction. [S. 45]

Vidjayane Durairaj-Vidjayane Velradjou. v. ITO (2025) 210 ITD 579 (Chennai) (Trib.)