This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Appeal-Delay of 1797 days-Reasonable cause-Affidavit-Liberal approach in condonation-Tribunal not justified in dismissing appeal without considering explanation-Delay condoned and matter remanded. [S. 254(1), 260A]
Neel Kumar Ajmera Alias Nilesh Ajmera v. PCIT (2025) 344 CTR 797 / 344 CTR 797 / 174 taxmann.com 242 (MP)(HC)
S. 245: Refunds-Set off of refunds against tax remaining payable-Recovery-Revenue has not issued any prior notice or intimation for making adjustment-Order set aside and refund directed to be paid with interest. [S. 220, 222, 237, Art. 226]
Huawei Telecommunications India Company (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 344 CTR 433 249 DTR 134 / 173 taxmann.com 396 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 222: Collection and recovery-Certificate to Tax Recovery Officer-Priority of secured creditor over Government dues-Prohibitory order-Prior hypothecation-Revenue’s inaction-Attachment cannot impede auction sale.[Art. 226]
Fasttrack Tieup (P) Ltd. v. UOI (2025) 344 CTR 78 / 248 DTR 113 /172 taxmann.com 541 (Delhi)(HC).
S. 195 : Deduction at source-Non-resident-Payment towards reimbursement of salary of seconded employees-Not liable for TDS –DTAA-India–USA. [S. 9(1)(vii), 90, 195(2), 197(2), Art. 12, Art. 226]
DCIT (IT). v. Flipkart Internet (P) Ltd. (2025) 344 CTR 414 / 249 DTR 287 / 171 taxmann.com 693 (Karn)(HC)
S. 153 : Assessment-Reassessment-Limitation-Finding or direction in appeal etc.-Stay of proceedings-Dismissal of writ petition-AO required to complete reassessment within sixty days from vacation of stay-Reassessment quashed as time barred. [S. 148, 153(6), Expln. 1 proviso, 245C, Art. 226]
Ameeta Goyal v. AUIT (2025) 344 CTR 681 / 248 DTR 362 / 173 taxmann.com 975 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Territorial jurisdiction of High Court-Place of assessing authority-Cause of action-Forum conveniens-Notice issued by income-tax officials in Kolkata-Writ jurisdiction depends on the authority passing the order within the territory, and not on the assessee’s residence or registered office-Assessee relegated to remedies at Kolkata. [Art. 226]
Trustcap (P) Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 344 CTR 801 / 249 DTR 473 / 173 taxmann.com 635 (Bom)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-Within four years-Issues already examined in original assessment-Change of opinion-Reasons recorded without application of mind-Objections not properly dealt with-Reassessment notice and order disposing objections quashed. [S. 36(1)(vii), 36(1)(viia), 80-IA, 143(3), 148, Art. 226, Companies Act, 2013, S. 129]
IDBI Bank Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 344 CTR 807 / 248 DTR 449 / 173 taxmann.com 881 (Bom)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-Information-Computer generated DIN-AO examined the information and transaction documents received from the complainant after giving opportunity of hearing to the assessee-Writ to quash proceedings dismissed. [S. 143(3), 143(3A), 148, Art. 226]
Shree Shakambhari Udyog v. CIT (2025) 344 CTR 612 / 249 DTR 297 / 173 taxmann.com 955 (Pat)(HC) Editorial: SLP rejected-Shree Shakambhari Udyog Partnership Firm v. CIT (2025) 306 Taxman 339 / 479 ITR 238 (SC)
S. 147: Reassessment-Validity-High-pitched assessment on non-existing entity-Addition made on basis of Multi Year MNS Data without application of mind-Merger of assessee-bank and surrender of PAN ignored-Sanction under S. 151 mechanical-Reassessment was quashed-Exemplary costs of Rs 1 crore was proposed for passing high pitched assessment order contrary to the facts available on record. [S. 144, 148, 151, Art. 226]
Punjab National Bank v. ITO (2025) 344 CTR 35 / 248 DTR 185 / 9 (Guj)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Failure to issue notice u/s 143(2)-Error in Form 10CCB regarding date of commencement of production-Date of grant of licence cannot normally be date of commencement of business –Mistake of Chartered Accountant in the Form No 10CCB-No failure to make true and full disclosure-Extended limitation of 6 years not available-Reassessment notice quashed. [S. 80IB, 143(2), 143(3),148, Form 10CCB, Art. 226]
ACIT v. Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. (2025) 344 CTR 567 / 249 DTR 329 / 305 Taxman 151 (Mad)(HC)