S. 195 : Deduction at source-Non-resident payments-Royalty
Payments for online advertisements to FB, AWS, RSC not royalty-No TDS liability-DTAA-India-USA.[S. 9(1)(vi), 201(1), 201(1A), 260A, Art. 12(3)]
S. 195 : Deduction at source-Non-resident payments-Royalty
Payments for online advertisements to FB, AWS, RSC not royalty-No TDS liability-DTAA-India-USA.[S. 9(1)(vi), 201(1), 201(1A), 260A, Art. 12(3)]
S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Block assessment-Satisfaction note of searched person not indicating anything against third party assessee-CBDT circular binding on assessing authority-Assessment orders and notices invalid for absence of satisfaction. [S. 132, 158BD, 260A]
CIT v. SRM Systems and Software Pvt. Ltd., (2025) 475 ITR 387 / 171 taxmann.com 764 (Mad.)(HC).S. 153: : Assessment-Reassessment-Limitation –Order of assessment passed on 28-12-2006 but communicated to assessee only on 5-1-2007-Assessment orders dated 28-12-2006 and penalty order dt. 29-6-2007 were barred by limitation-Alternative remedy not absolute bar for issue of writ. [S. 148, 153(1), 153(2), Art. 226
Mema Paul and others v. ITO [2024] 164 taxmann.com 778 / (2025) 475 ITR 19 (Manipur)(HC)S. 153: Assessment-Limitation-Transfer pricing adjustments-Tribunal’s order remitting matter to Assessing Officer dated 21-10-2020 (after 01-04-2019)-Limitation period of twelve months expired on 21-10-2021-Assessment is barred by limitation. [S. 92CA, 153(3); Art. 226]
Consulting Engineering Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Assessment Unit, (2025) 475 ITR 375 / 173 taxmann.com 857 (Delhi HC).S. 153 : Assessment-Limitation-Limitation to be computed from date order is received from higher authority-Order received on 30-1-2021; order of assessment on 13-2-2023 barred by limitation. [S. 92CA, 153(3), Art. 226]
Readers Digest Book and Home Entertainment (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 475 ITR 260 (Delhi)(HC)S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Non application of mind-Notice and order disposing the objection was quashed. [S. 147, 148,148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
SBC Minerals Pvt. Ltd. v Asst. CIT [2024] 167 taxmann.com 113 /(2025) 475 ITR 360 (Delhi)(HC)S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Satisfied-The approval is a safeguard and has to be meaningful and not merely ritualistic or formal-General order of approval for all the 111 cases-Mechanical according of sanction-Not valid.[S. 147, 148, Art. 226]
Vinod Kumar Solanki v.Asst. CIT (2025) 475 ITR 208 (Delhi)(HC)S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice –Recording of satisfaction-Sanction was valid.[S. 148, Art. 136]
Venky Steels Pvt. Ltd v. CIT (2025) 475 ITR 148 / 304 Taxman 597 (SC) Editorial : Venky Steels (P.) Ltd. v. CIT(2024) 301 Taxman 344 /(2025) 475 ITR 111 (Pat)(HC)S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Original notice under section 148 issued before 1-4-2021 culminated in reassessment order attaining finality-Fresh notice under section 148A(b) impermissible-Supreme Court directions in UOI v. Ashish Agarwal limited to pending reassessment proceedings-Notice and order quashed. [S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
Merton v. Dy. CIT (2025) 475 ITR 734 / 171 taxmann.com 544 (Mad)(HC)S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry; providing opportunity before issue of notice-Faceless assessment-Initial notice and order-Pending appeal before Commissioner (Appeals) and revision application before Principal Chief Commissioner-Stay of assessment order until outcome of appellate proceedings and revisional application-All contentions of assessee kept open for raising before statutory authorities. [S. 144, 144B, 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 250, 253; Art. 226]
Rajan Pradeepkumar Dubey v. ITO, (2025) 475 ITR 413 (Bom. HC)