This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 194H : Deduction at source-Commission or brokerage-Telecom services-Discount to distributors-Agreement is not considered-Matter remanded [S. 201]

Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. ITO (TDS) (2023) 201 ITD 695 (Indore) (Trib.)

S. 194A : Deduction at source-Interest other than interest on securities-Compensation /damage for delayed allotment of plot of land-Not interest not liable to deduct tax at source-Deduction of tax at source by mistake the assessee cannot be treated as assessee is default-Interest cannot be levied. [S. 2(28A), 133A, 201(1)]

Sawhney Builders (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (TDS) (2023) 201 ITD 259 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Mistake apparent from the record-Delay in deposit of employees’ contribution-Order of rectification is not valid.[S. 36(1)(va). 143(1)]

Sanjay Kumar. v. ITO (2023) 201 ITD 837 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Mercantile system of accounting-Payment of interest-Related parties-No modification in loan agreement-Terms cannot be modified by Board Resolution.[S.40A(2), Accounting Standard-9 (AS-9)]

Bangalore Beverages Ltd. v. ITO (2023) 201 ITD 380 (Bang) (Trib.)

S. 80 : Return for losses-Capital loss-Revised return filed beyond time limit prescribed under section 139(1)-Capital loss claimed beyond time limit under section 139(1) could not be carried forward under section 74. [S.74, 139(1), 139(5)]

RRPR Holding (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2023) 201 ITD 781/226 TTJ 5599 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Consultancy fees-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer. [S. 37(1)]

Bangalore Beverages Ltd. v. ITO (2023) 201 ITD 380 (Bang) (Trib.)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Advocate-Cash fee received from client-Produced cash book, bank statement, professional fees etc-Addition is deleted.

Ramchandra Kanu Mendadkar. v. CIT(A) (2023) 201 ITD 492/104 ITR 21 (SN) (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Foreign bank account-Bank details for period 1-4-1995 to 31-3-2012-Information called for by revenue could not have been received for period prior to 1-4-2011-Period of limitation cannot be extended-Order is barred by limitation-DTAA-India-Switzerland [S. 90, 132, 143(3), 153A]

Praveen Sawhney. v. ACIT (2023) 201 ITD 539 / 224 TTJ 46(Delhi) (Trib.)/Sangeeta Sawhney v. ACIT (2023) 201 ITD 539/ 224 TTJ 46 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Investment in acquisition of immoveable property-Additional evidence is filed-Matter remanded to Assessing Officer. [S.254(1)]

Narasimha Rao Venkata Lakshmi Nandury. v. ITO (IT) (2023) 201 ITD 534 (Hyd) (Trib.)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Long term capital gains-Penny stock-Paper company-Accommodation entries-Undisclosed income-Assessable under section 115BBE of the Act. [S.45, 68, 69D, 115BBE]

Rahul Gupta (HUF) v. ACIT (2023) 201 ITD 302 (Raipur) (Trib.)