This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Depreciation-Computer software-Ticketing system for Airlines-Enduring nature-Capital expenditure-Entitled to depreciation at 60 Per Cent. [S. 32]

Spicejet Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2023)102 ITR 58 (Delhi)(Trib)

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Failure to deduct tax at source–Royalty-Matter remanded-DTAA-India-Netherlands-Cash credits-Share capital matter remanded-Office repairs and maintenance-Matter remanded-Disallowance of expenditure in relation to exempt income-Income from dividend-Matter remanded to verify assessee’s claim of income being exempt.[S.14A, 40(a)(i),68, 195]

Spicejet Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2023)102 ITR 58 (Delhi)(Trib)

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Interest paid on delayed remittance of tax-Not allowable as deduction.

Spicejet Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2023)102 ITR 58 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Depreciation-Computer software-Ticketing system for Airlines-Enduring nature-Capital expenditure-Entitled to depreciation at 60 Per Cent. [S. 32]

Spicejet Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2023)102 ITR 58 (Delhi)(Trib)

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Failure to deduct tax at source–Royalty-Matter remanded-DTAA-India-Netherlands-Cash credits-Share capital matter remanded-Office repairs and maintenance-Matter remanded-Disallowance of expenditure in relation to exempt income-Income from dividend-Matter remanded to verify assessee’s claim of income being exempt.[S.14A, 40(a)(i),68, 195]

Spicejet Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2023)102 ITR 58 (Delhi)(Trib)

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Interest paid on delayed remittance of tax-Not allowable as deduction.

Spicejet Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2023)102 ITR 58 (Delhi)(Trib)

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Wages is allowed in the year of final settlement and on actual payment only.[S. 145]

Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd v. DCIT (2023) 102 ITR 76 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Project abandoned-Joint venture project-Expenditure incurred relating to a joint venture project later abandoned is allowable in so far as the expenditure is incurred by the Assessee itself and not the joint venture entity.

Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd v. DCIT (2023) 102 ITR 76 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Administrative expenses-No business activity-Insurance premium-Allowable as deduction.

Oceanic Vehicles Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (2023) 102 ITR 70 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(xii) :Corporation or body corporate-Central or State or Provisional Act-Business expenditure–Absence of notification in the relevant year-Not allowable as deduction. [S.37(1)]

Dy. CIT v. National Bank for Agriculture & Rural Development [2023] 221 TTJ 25 /221 DTR 369 (Mum) (Trib)